EPISCOPAL CHURCH VOTES TO DIVEST FROM ISRAELI HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES

You are charged with being honest.

Thank you

Your claim is that Lord Balfour was a "Christian Zionist," a term invented by the JOOOOOOOO hating left in the last decade.

It's spelled ' Jew ' actually- and there 's nothing remiss in applying an accurate description retrospectively.

Balfour supported the return of the Jews (whom the left bitterly hates) to Israel after the Muslim whores (better?) drove them from their homeland in the mid-eighth century.

I don't believe for an instant that you can define ' the Left '- let alone know the thoughts of an entire political division. Still- have a go.

YOU made the absurd claim of "Christian Zionist," which is your's alone to support. I have no need to prove your Islamist bullshit to be false, support your own claims.

Nothing absurd about it- ' yours ' doesn't take a possessive apostrophe and I am not an Islamist. You ain't doin' so good for a self-styled neoZionism pumper.
 
Thank you



It's spelled ' Jew ' actually- and there 's nothing remiss in applying an accurate description retrospectively.



I don't believe for an instant that you can define ' the Left '- let alone know the thoughts of an entire political division. Still- have a go.



Nothing absurd about it- ' yours ' doesn't take a possessive apostrophe and I am not an Islamist. You ain't doin' so good for a self-styled neoZionism pumper.



Clearly you are an Islamist, perhaps a Muslim supremacist?
 
ROFL

Are you a Jehovah's Witness?

Jesus returned, but no one noticed?

LOL

That's what that cult believes. They claim that Jesus did return in 1914 but, conveniently, it was invisible as it occurred in heaven.

Ever wonder why they aren't allowed to speak to listen to what others have to say about what the Bible teaches?

I found a good way to get rid of them when they come to my door. Several years ago, they showed up but didn't identify themselves as being from the local Kingdom Hall. They said they'd like to talk to me. When they pulled out the Watchtower publication, I knew who they were. I told them I'd gladly listen to what they had to say for 5 minutes under the condition that I get 5 minutes when they were done. They left.
 
Nope. I'm a Kiwi buddhist this week. I think maybe you've got Palestinian blood all over your crystal ball.

You should enrol with the Maggot & Sailor travel agency.



Is lying for Allah a precept of the Kiwi sect of Buddhism?

Seems a rather strange one...
 
Is lying for Allah a precept of the Kiwi sect of Buddhism?

Seems a rather strange one...

Of course not. The goal of the buddhist adherent is non-engagement.
Was your foolish question the result of ignorance or were you prompted by some malevolent neoZionist entity ?
 
You sprinkle factoids into overall falsehood.

Islam supports a Caliphate. Both Sunni and Shia support a Caliphate. Every Muslim after the fall of the Ottomans desired another Caliph rise. The problem is that the Muslims were so fragmented that no one faction had enough power to pull it off. The house of Saud would not allow Hussein bin Ali (Emir of Mecca) to assume the role of Caliph, That would destroy their position as protectors of the Idol and Mecca. Had a Saudi had the support to declare himself Caliph, the house of Saud would have been all for it.

BTW, Trans-Jordan is every bit as much a construct of Balfour and the British as was the partition of Israel. Yet the JOOOOOOOO hating left never complains about Jordan, or Lebanon.

The Arabs didn't want another caliphate because the last one was such a dud.. and it set the Arab world back into illiteracy.

The Emir of Mecca had mental health problems and NO following on the Arabian peninsula.

Ibn Saud had the support of the tribes, but he didn't want to be Caliph.. The only countries that have any interest have no oil.. Nasser wanted a Caliphate with him in charge of everyone else's oil revenue..

But, Western nincompoops have been yapping about a new Caliphate since the 1940s.. saying Farouk or the Mufti of Ibn Saudi were likely candidates. LOLOL
 
Of course not. The goal of the buddhist adherent is non-engagement.
Was your foolish question the result of ignorance or were you prompted by some malevolent neoZionist entity ?


Nothing foolish about my question.

Since you blatantly lie to further the goals of Islam yet claim to be Buddhist (which you can't manage to spell correctly) one has to wonder if you belong to a sect that holds lying for Allah as a virtue?

The goal of Buddhism is to escape the cycle of rebirth and obtain Nirvana.

Rather odd that an adherent would not grasp the most fundamental precepts.... I've met a lot of Marxists who claim to be Buddhist because they think it sounds cool, though having no actual grasp of what the religion entails...
 
Nothing foolish about my question.

" I see no ships "

Since you blatantly lie to further the goals of Islam yet claim to be Buddhist (which you can't manage to spell correctly) one has to wonder if you belong to a sect that holds lying for Allah as a virtue?

Point out what you perceive to be a ' lie ', would you. It demands a repeat, I think.
If you want to give ' buddhist ' a cap go right ahead. It belongs with christian in my list of diminutive brain-rots.
" One has to wonder " does one ? Silly poseur.

The goal of Buddhism is to escape the cycle of rebirth and obtain Nirvana.

Geez ! I think I'll switch to zoroastrian. I've got a whole heap of vinyl already.


Rather odd that an adherent would not grasp the most fundamental precepts.... I've met a lot of Marxists who claim to be Buddhist because they think it sounds cool, though having no actual grasp of what the religion entails...

You've missed the practical point of buddhism, poseur- which is why you ain't one. Disengagement , the practical objective, precludes any competent buddhist from posing in a political forum.
Have a good wriggle then come back with another attempt at impression.
 
Now where were we....

SOCIALIST INTERNATIONAL OF 140 GLOBAL POLITICAL PARTIES ADOPTS BDS, CALLS FOR MILITARY EMBARGO

Association of 140 global political parties, including 35 parties in government, adopts BDS and calls for a military embargo on Israel until it ends its violations of Palestinian rights. This is the most significant call for sanctions against Israel to date.

https://bdsmovement.net/news/social...ties-adopts-bds-calls-military-embargo-israel

That's a biggie too.

It seems that there's a strong area of agreement between religious thinkers , socialists and anti-fascists.
With the forthcoming demographic shift in the USA, the Latino majority, white Evangelism is going to lose political power, I dare say. That's bad news for Izraeli fascists, good news for world peace.
 
Back
Top