EPA EMPLOYEES "openly celebrated" in the halls about PRUITTS 'firing'...

Try really hard, DEMOCRAT. I have faith in your imagination.

Loser.

:rofl2:

Nope, Stalker. Hard to imagine worse than a slimey, fundamentalist, flat-earther, Bible-thumping crook to run an agency like the EPA, where science has such importance. How many investigations on the slimeball in such a short period? 12? 13? More? That's a high bar, rube.

But, then again, illiterate dumbfucks struggle with simple words and their meaning, much less complicated issues involving real science.
 
EPA employees and protesters react to EPA chief Pruitt’s resignation

Good riddance to bad rubbish?!!

https://globalnews.ca/video/4315968...esters-react-to-epa-chief-pruitts-resignation

Toon-Bagley-Cagle-good-riddance-1.jpg
 
Nope, Stalker. Hard to imagine worse than a slimey, fundamentalist, flat-earther, Bible-thumping crook to run an agency like the EPA, where science has such importance. How many investigations on the slimeball in such a short period? 12? 13? More? That's a high bar, rube. But, then again, illiterate dumbfucks struggle with simple words and their meaning, much less complicated issues involving real science.

You'll find a way if a way can be found, DEMOCRAT. Yes, you can!

Loser.

:rofl2:
 
It won’t be stalking, it will just be reading your posts and making sure you are applying your own criteria.

Do you still think that multiple sources reporting the same thing is the same as "at least two unrelated confirmations"?
 
Scott Pruitt was the media target like no other because he has dared to actually reverse the green agenda in D.C. The Press put Pruitt under a microscope because his EPA reform agenda is their biggest threat.
 
Last edited:
Do you still think that multiple sources reporting the same thing is the same as "at least two unrelated confirmations"?
I’ll just be looking for two unrelated confirmations in everything you post. That is your criteria, and that’s what you will need to back up your posts on here from now on. It’s your rules :)
 
So you say. Don't you normally claim you're ignoring someone after they put a butt-whomping on you?
No, I usually ignore them if they are racists or have called me a cunt. Know any people like that?

oh, and Tom, just because
 
The EPA is mostly staffed by entrenched progressive liberals- where’s the news in their celebrating Pruitt’s resignation?
 
Back
Top