EPA chief admits climate change is real — but ‘the real issue is how much we contribu

domer76 said:
Right. Water vapor levels will not increase with increasing temperatures.

This is what tickles me. I haven't taken any position on AGW. Yet you have been here, publically trashing those that are. With your own posts, you admit you, in fact, ARE an AGW proponent.

Try to be more honest with your 1.5, pal. That represents the low estimate in every reference I have encountered. Scientific honesty requires you provide the range, which is about 1.5-3.8, 2.5
Click to expand...
They may well do so, but why would that be a positive feedback?

https://judithcurry.com/2011/09/24/water-vapor-feedback-evaporation/

Sent from my iPhone 10S
 
Milagro said:
So why you getting so agitated about AGW then? I am telling you what I believe, you are free to choose whatever floats your boat. Suffice to say this is what happens when you let green zealots control policy.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4380806/Man-dash-diesel-called-C02-worse-terror.html


Sent from my iPhone 10S
Click to expand...

I got into this thread mocking the morons claiming it was nothing more thsn a "trace plant food". None of them responded with anything until you stepped in with your equations. I looked into them only to discover it outs you as an AGW proponent. Damn funny!
 
domer76 said:
I got into this thread mocking the morons claiming it was nothing more thsn a "trace plant food". None of them responded with anything until you stepped in with your equations. I looked into them only to discover it outs you as an AGW proponent. Damn funny!
Click to expand...

I am a lukewarmer, if you paid more attention you'd know that without playing your convoluted mindgames. I still don't know what you hoped to achieve, apart from looking like a complete fool.

Sent from my iPhone 10S
 
Last edited:
Milagro said:
I am a lukewarmer, if you paid more attention you'd know that without playing your convoluted mindgames.

Sent from my iPhone 10S
Click to expand...

Oh, so you're "bi". lol

1.5 is significant
2.5 (or perhaps even 2) and above is catastrophic

You kinda let that little tidbit pass.
 
20170329edloc-a.jpg
 
domer76 said:
Oh, so you're "bi". lol

1.5 is significant
2.5 (or perhaps even 2) and above is catastrophic

You kinda let that little tidbit pass.
Click to expand...

I have made it abundantly clear many times, indeed just about every effing time that some clown calls me a denier yet again.

I have grave doubts that the retention time for CO2 is hundreds of years as recent research tends to indicate it may be only tens of years or less. So I cannot see any scenario where CO2 will get about 560ppmv or double the value at the start of the Industrial Age. I know many will be disappointed to hear that they won't be fried or burnt to a crisp, however I am sure there enough bogeymen out there to replace it.

Sent from my iPhone 10S
 
Last edited:
domer76 said:
I got into this thread mocking the morons claiming it was nothing more thsn a "trace plant food". None of them responded with anything until you stepped in with your equations. I looked into them only to discover it outs you as an AGW proponent. Damn funny!
Click to expand...
You got into this thread because you are thought that it would be easy to show everybody what a clever clogs you are, if you were being honest. The lesson here is don't bring a knife to a gun fight!

Sent from my iPhone 10S
 
Milagro said:
You got into this thread because you are thought that it would be easy to show everybody what a clever clogs you are, if you were being honest. The lesson here is don't bring a knife to a gun fight!

Sent from my iPhone 10S
Click to expand...

You came in here throwing your cut-and-paste bullshit around thinking everyone would be impressed. Well, pal, I'm not.

I called you on your scientific dishonesty. You made your claim of 1.5k as if it were gospel. It's not, boy blunder. In fact, review of the literature shows that your little 'etched in stone' gem is universally viewed as the very lowest of projections.

Your gun, moron, is a water pistol. And you're squirting us on the leg and telling us it's raining.

Poor closet AGW advocate. It must be difficult in the shadows.
 
domer76 said:
You came in here throwing your cut-and-paste bullshit around thinking everyone would be impressed. Well, pal, I'm not.

I called you on your scientific dishonesty. You made your claim of 1.5k as if it were gospel. It's not, boy blunder. In fact, review of the literature shows that your little 'etched in stone' gem is universally viewed as the very lowest of projections.

Your gun, moron, is a cap gun.
Click to expand...

Again there is absolutely no empirical evidence that positive feedbacks even exist, you can say what you like sonny but that's a fact. There is every good reason to think that extra water vapour may well be a negative feedback, I don't know, and what's more to the point nor do you.


http://clivebest.com/blog/?p=3659



domer76 said:
You came in here throwing your cut-and-paste bullshit around thinking everyone would be impressed. Well, pal, I'm not.

I called you on your scientific dishonesty. You made your claim of 1.5k as if it were gospel. It's not, boy blunder. In fact, review of the literature shows that your little 'etched in stone' gem is universally viewed as the very lowest of projections.

Your gun, moron, is a water pistol. And you're squirting us on the leg and telling us it's raining.

Poor closet AGW advocate. It must be difficult in the shadows.
Click to expand...


Sent from my iPhone 10S
 
Milagro said:
Again there is absolutely no empirical evidence that positive feedbacks even exist, you can say what you like sonny but that's a fact. There is every good reason to think that extra water vapour may well be a negative feedback, I don't know, and what's more to the point nor do you.


http://clivebest.com/blog/?p=3659






Sent from my iPhone 10S
Click to expand...

lol

Poor little closet AGW. Dishonest one at that.

I'm not going to get into a one-for-one exchange of articles about positive feedback. You'd lose major league on that one.

Methane
Water vapor
Ice-albedo

Take your pissant water pistol and go home, punk. You ran out of ammo.
 
domer76 said:
lol

Poor little closet AGW. Dishonest one at that.

I'm not going to get into a one-for-one exchange of articles about positive feedback. You'd lose major league on that one.

Methane
Water vapor
Ice-albedo

Take your pissant water pistol and go home, punk. You ran out of ammo.
Click to expand...
You seem more concerned in having a who can piss furthest up a wall competition, just put your todger away it's getting embarrassing.

Sent from my iPhone 10S
 
Milagro said:
You seem more concerned in having a who can piss furthest up a wall competition, just put your todger away it's getting embarrassing.

Sent from my iPhone 10S
Click to expand...

Read it and weep, pal. Argue with the proponents of the phenomena, not me. I'm merely pointing out that the literature says you're full of shit. I concur. The best you seem to do is a blog.
 
domer76 said:
You really are dense aren't you? Here's the obvious truth, dumbfuck.

THERE WERE NO PEOPLE

No cities to be submerged. No massive human migration. No disturbance to socio-economic institutions. No massive famine and disease. No wars as a result.

NO PEOPLE, you fucking moron.

I feel like I'm talking to a 4 year old.
Click to expand...

But where did all that CO2 come from and where did it go?
Since plant life was very abundant, why are you bringing up famine and disease?

But since it's apparent that you're basing all your complaints on SPECULATION, ASSUMPTIONS, ASSERTIONS, and CONJECTURE; it basically boils down that you have nothing definitive and are just scard.

As to you feeling like your talking to a 4 year old, then maybe you should stop talking to yourself. :D
 
domer76 said:
The obvious problem, you pathetic idiot, is that we now have a planet with 8 billion PEOPLE.

What a pitiful example of a "thinking" animal you are.
Click to expand...

From your previous post it is now very clear that All of your complaining, regarding global warming climate control; is all based on maybe's and could be's.

:good4u:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top