EPA can no longer dictate CO2 emissions

[Into the Night]

The Supreme Court handed down another blow to Democrats, ruling that alphabet agencies like the EPA cannot just arbitrarily make law, such as regulating the emission of a gas.

Rolling Stone Magazine described it as "The Supreme Court rules 6-3 that the planet should burn."

Democrat reaction was predictable. Run around in circles screaming, "Fire! Fire!", in a perfectly hilarious clown show.

 

[Lionfish]

The Supreme Court handed down another blow to Democrats, ruling that alphabet agencies like the EPA cannot just arbitrarily make law, such as regulating the emission of a gas.

Rolling Stone Magazine described it as "The Supreme Court rules 6-3 that the planet should burn."

Democrat reaction was predictable. Run around in circles screaming, "Fire! Fire!", in a perfectly hilarious clown show.

Wouldn't it be easier to cut CO2 emissions by shoving a tennis ball into Al Gore's mouth?

 

[Celticguy]

Greta will pout most terribly now.

Not sure if I am happier that agencies can no longer write laws of this particular one is going away.

Congress really MUST resume its job of being the one that writes legislation.

 

[archives]

Oh boy, now we’re going to get the arguments and “proof” from obscure weathermen and contrarian professors, usually secretly funded by the fossil fuel industries, that supposedly prove that climate change is a hoax, a fabrication, all in the hopes of selling a false paradigm, which obviously the above posters have swallowed

Very similar to the Big Lie, unless God Himself descends from above and tells them they are wrong their obstinateness will never allow them to accept the facts

 

[NiftyNiblick]

The six Republican appointed justices should be dragged through the streets in chains so that decent people could stone them to death.
Add the McConnell's and the DeSantis' and the Abbotts and the Cruzes etc. to the chain gang. Not to mention the orangutan.


And unless we actually do it, they'll be nothing left of this republic that's worthwhile to save.
Is there even anything now?

 

[Lionfish]

The six Republican appointed justices should be dragged through the streets in chains so that decent people could stone them to death.
Add the McConnell's and the DeSantis' and the Abbotts and the Cruzes etc. to the chain gang. Not to mention the orangutan.


And unless we actually do it, they'll be nothing left of this republic that's worthwhile to save.
Is there even anything now?

You continue to prove you are an idiot. Irrational, unhinged, and violent is no way to go through life.
You threatening SC justices is not a good idea.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

You continue to prove you are an idiot. Irrational, unhinged, and violent is no way to go through life.
You threatening SC justices is not a good idea.

I'm not threatening anybody, pigfucker. I'm saying what I'd like the coward Biden to do. Bernie or Liz would have done it already, bless them.

 

[Grokmaster]

UNELECTED BUREAUCRATS CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO WEILD WIDE-RANGING POWERS OVER THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.


BRAVO.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

 

[BartenderElite]

I'm sure that's gonna end well....

 

[zymurgy]

The six Republican appointed justices should be dragged through the streets in chains so that decent people could stone them to death.
Add the McConnell's and the DeSantis' and the Abbotts and the Cruzes etc. to the chain gang. Not to mention the orangutan.


And unless we actually do it, they'll be nothing left of this republic that's worthwhile to save.
Is there even anything now?

the crybaby is crying some more

"decent people" should drag the justices through the street waaah. waaah

 

[cawacko]

I’m trying to understand the argument, not misrepresent it. As I understand it, if we don’t act and make significant changes within a decade or so the damage we will have done will be irreversible for the planet.

This blue check mark Nasa scientist is talking about thousands of years from now. I take it that’s good news he thinks people will still be around that long? (He tweeted this prior to the official ruling)

https://twitter.com/x/status/1540471511433105408

 

[BartenderElite]

I’m trying to understand the argument, not misrepresent it. As I understand it, if we don’t act and make significant changes within a decade or so the damage we will have done will be irreversible for the planet.

This blue check mark Nasa scientist is talking about thousands of years from now. I take it that’s good news he thinks people will still be around that long?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1540471511433105408

The earth will be just fine. It will recover in the long run - we're kind of a blip.

Humanity, maybe not so much.

 

[anonymoose]

The earth will be just fine. It will recover in the long run - we're kind of a blip.

Humanity, maybe not so much.

Or maybe so. Or maybe I don't know.

Doesn't matter:
" In about a billion years, most life on Earth will eventually die anyway due to a lack of oxygen. That’s according to a different study published in March in the journal Nature Geoscience.

The researchers suggest that our oxygen-rich atmosphere is not a permanent feature of the planet. Instead, in about a billion years, solar activity will cause atmospheric oxygen to plummet back down to the level it was at before the Great Oxidation Event."
https://astronomy.com/news/2021/05/how-will-life-on-earth-end

 

[Monad Portal]

The Supreme Court handed down another blow to Democrats, ruling that alphabet agencies like the EPA cannot just arbitrarily make law, such as regulating the emission of a gas.

Rolling Stone Magazine described it as "The Supreme Court rules 6-3 that the planet should burn."

Democrat reaction was predictable. Run around in circles screaming, "Fire! Fire!", in a perfectly hilarious clown show.

SUch a win!


fuck co2 hysteria.

 

[BartenderElite]

Or maybe so. Or maybe I don't know.

Doesn't matter:
" In about a billion years, most life on Earth will eventually die anyway due to a lack of oxygen. That’s according to a different study published in March in the journal Nature Geoscience.

The researchers suggest that our oxygen-rich atmosphere is not a permanent feature of the planet. Instead, in about a billion years, solar activity will cause atmospheric oxygen to plummet back down to the level it was at before the Great Oxidation Event."
https://astronomy.com/news/2021/05/how-will-life-on-earth-end

That's very true. But a billion years is quite a long time.

We're accelerating the pace of making the planet uninhabitable for humans. But something else will adapt to the new conditions and take our place.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

The way humans are devolving into diseased trumpanzee mutants, we're probably well overdue to be replaced by the next dominant species.
And it won't be trumpanzees--they're way too stupid to save themselves.

 

[Monad Portal]

That's very true. But a billion years is quite a long time.

We're accelerating the pace of making the planet uninhabitable for humans. But something else will adapt to the new conditions and take our place.

lie.

 

[BartenderElite]

lie.

Nah. Not at all.

 

[Bigdog]

Oh boy, now we’re going to get the arguments and “proof” from obscure weathermen and contrarian professors, usually secretly funded by the fossil fuel industries, that supposedly prove that climate change is a hoax, a fabrication, all in the hopes of selling a false paradigm, which obviously the above posters have swallowed

Very similar to the Big Lie, unless God Himself descends from above and tells them they are wrong their obstinateness will never allow them to accept the facts

CO2 Death cultists

Climate Audit showing the logarithmic heating effect of carbon dioxide relative to atmospheric concentration:

Science shows the decreasing effect of CO2. Each molecule of CO2 has less effect than the previous one.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/03/08/the-logarithmic-effect-of-carbon-dioxide/