Emmett Till / Trayvon Martin - An Awakening to Racist Evil in America

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's all good Onceler, they'll try to silence you, ironically by saying you are somehow trying to silence them. The thing of it is, the "agree damn you!" mentality doesn't help the conversation at all. If we are ever to get to a point where Dr. King has a shot of seeing his dream we have to be able to actually talk about it.

Yes, and not dismiss it or tell a black man that his response is over the top or words to that effect.

Your post was so helpful in bringing about a discussion, lol
 
So, anybody want to talk about Qin Shi Huang?

l68fZRe.jpg
 
Last edited:
Yes, and not dismiss it or tell a black man that his response is over the top or words to that effect.

Your post was so helpful in bringing about a discussion, lol

Have I said that? I'd appreciate you showing where that happened. Being able to say, "I think you are wrong in this case, and that the comparison case you use has these differences, and this is why." must be part of the conversation if we are ever to hold a conversation on the issue.

If one side isn't allowed to speak at all per the rules of "agree or we'll call you racist regardless of past and current agreements" it becomes a net loss to the conversation. In such a case the conversation can't even be contemplated because if one doesn't agree with you they are monstrous hideous beasts who "believe" something they've never shown a proclivity to believe.

The attempts to shut him up in one form or another is directly antithetical to the conversation taking place.
 




Rune




Rune is offline Mjölner


Join Date:Jan 2011Location:VinlandPosts:15,030Thanks:10,341Thanked 3,607 Times in 2,802 Posts Groans:2,310 Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,711 Posts Blog Entries:4


Default








Quote Originally Posted by Thing1 View Post

I'm not trying to "silence" anyone. Comparing this to Emmett Till is patently absurb. Does intent mean nothing to you?
Are you on fucking drugs?
I really want to know, because whatever you have is a hell of a lot better than what I am smoking.




do you really think this is completely unlike the till case?


really?
 
Some people (Lorax, myself) think the evidence in the case and the ineptness of the prosecution led to the acquittal of Zimmerman. Others (BAC, Desh) proclaim that we are racists for thinking that.

No it isn't, don't listen to his take, it is incorrect, sheesh, he doesn't even realize, STILL, why BAC is upset, could he please buy a clue.
 
Have I said that? I'd appreciate you showing where that happened. Being able to say, "I think you are wrong in this case, and that the comparison case you use has these differences, and this is why." must be part of the conversation if we are ever to hold a conversation on the issue.

If one side isn't allowed to speak at all per the rules of "agree or we'll call you racist regardless of past and current agreements" it becomes a net loss. A conversation can't even be contemplated because if one doesn't agree with you the are monstrous hideous beasts who believe something they've never shown a proclivity to believe.

You are as clueless as SF.
 
Rune




Rune is offline Mjölner


Join Date:Jan 2011Location:VinlandPosts:15,030Thanks:10,341Thanked 3,607 Times in 2,802 Posts Groans:2,310 Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,711 Posts Blog Entries:4


Default








Quote Originally Posted by Thing1 View Post

I'm not trying to "silence" anyone. Comparing this to Emmett Till is patently absurb. Does intent mean nothing to you?
Are you on fucking drugs?
I really want to know, because whatever you have is a hell of a lot better than what I am smoking.




do you really think this is completely unlike the till case?


really?

The Till case was worse because Till was younger, it was totally premeditated, and there were basically no overly broad laws that can be said to have forced the juries hand, the jury just totally ignored the law because it was a black kid.
 
The Till case was worse because Till was younger, it was totally premeditated, and there were basically no overly broad laws that can be said to have forced the juries hand, the jury just totally ignored the law because it was a black kid.

You have just outed yourself as a racist and a true right winger... no seriously, that is what you are about to hear from Desh.
 
um dude its the right who is wittleing away at their own ability to win elections here with all this racism.


Pointing out traitors to our side is healthy

One is a traitor because they simply disagree with you once? When did you become the all-encompassing judge of the Democratic Party? And what authority were you given when they voted you in?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top