Editor Is Fired, but Not Silenced, Over the NRA

Are you saying that a heavily-biased person of any party shouldn't be allowed to post their viewpoint?

She worked for that paper 31 years, obviously they knew her political bent.

Still no proof that the NRA got her canned like you claimed?

Like everything else you are leaping to conclusions without knowing the facts. When will you learn your lesson?
 
Nobody deserves blame more than an organization that tries to instill fear in people over "jack-booted government thugs."

Strictly a fallacious appeal to emotion.

Coming from the party that tells women they will have to resort to shoving hangers in their pussies to kill their baby if republicans are elected that is rich.

You have had almost 24 hours to back up the claim that the NRA had her fired.

My guess is that you say "while they didn't directly do it the fear of them did"
 
The NRA are a bunch of fascist cunts, 'nuff said.

Fascists? Maybe not in the traditional sense. They are profit motivated opportunists who take the gun industry's money in exchange for promoting fear and gun insanity ...
If they were real fascists they would do something crazy, like promoting the idea that international terrorists have every right to buy all the guns they want...


...oh wait!!...
 
You can't tell us apart? His name is Rune, mine is Rana, his name has a "u" and an "e", mine has two "a's". My name is also in red, and his isn't. I hope this clarifies things for you, I know it is difficult for you, sorry.

Swish, missed the obvious again
 
Are you saying that a heavily-biased person of any party shouldn't be allowed to post their viewpoint?

No, I never said that. I never said she shouldn't be allowed to say her view or anything remotely like that. Can I have a hit of what you're smoking? You have some great shit there.

She worked for that paper 31 years, obviously they knew her political bent.

What does that have to do with insubordination?

Do you have anything to say about the point I made? I'm not sure why you quoted me. I said the article was long on accusation and short on support for that accusation. For example, that the NRA had anything to do with her getting sacked
 
Untrue.
You just didn't find the thread.

You have never been able to point me to your fictitious post. You're a flat out liar, you never gave examples of anything right wing that is not libertarian I said. You can't even remember what you said in your fabricated post. you just compound lie with lie
 
You don't know that, the article gave no facts, just their opinion. It's sad that not only doesn't bother you but you repeat their opinion as fact

Exactly. The article was long on nasty gun lovers and all but non existant on who what where when why. That's a good indication that those Ws would spoil the passion play they were going for. Whatever the background is you can bet it's not favorable to the ex employee.
 
You have never been able to point me to your fictitious post. You're a flat out liar, you never gave examples of anything right wing that is not libertarian I said. You can't even remember what you said in your fabricated post. you just compound lie with lie

Bullshit.
Show where I ever lied.
 
Back
Top