Actually you are once again incorrect. They were your words.
See post 26.
I used "turn around" Never did I use your words, "Turned around". A different meaning is conveyed. Your words convey the past tense.
Actually you are once again incorrect. They were your words.
See post 26.
dude we know your not a finance junkie like me and freaktard.
It's a guy thing, hose other guys at ever chance to razz them.
good going on the house.
Mine dumped about 50G's in value in 2 yrs from purchase price, hopefully your catching it near the bottom.
I used "turn around" Never did I use your words, "Turned around". A different meaning is conveyed. Your words convey the past tense.
You stated the 'turn around has begun'.... which signifies a change in direction you twit.... also note the 'has begun' portion twit... that also indicates the start point in the change in direction is in the past...
good god it hurts my brain trying to read jarods posts.
No, you are wrong... A ship going 7 knots begins its turn around by slowing down...... It is still heading the wrong direction but has begun its turn around. It has not "turned around"!
Same with the economy!!!
LMAO.... so if jobs over the next twelve months go...
down 300k
down 290k
down 280k
down 270k
down 260k
down 250k
down 240k
down 230k
down 220k
down 210k
down 200k
down 190k
That would indicate it has 'begun to turn around' ???
LMAO.... so if jobs over the next twelve months go...
down 300k
down 290k
down 280k
down 270k
down 260k
down 250k
down 240k
down 230k
down 220k
down 210k
down 200k
down 190k
That would indicate it has 'begun to turn around' ???
Yes, but unacceptably slow!
so if after that the next twelve months all saw the same pattern of losing jobs at a 10k per month reduction each month, that would still be a turn around?
Just admit that a turn around is a change in direction because by your standards I can make that last about 90 years if I want. For a turn around to begin, you have to STOP going in the same direction you are currently heading. Which by jobs numbers means you have to at a minimum see it flatten out.... with ZERO jobs lost.
so if after that the next twelve months all saw the same pattern of losing jobs at a 10k per month reduction each month, that would still be a turn around?
Just admit that a turn around is a change in direction because by your standards I can make that last about 90 years if I want. For a turn around to begin, you have to STOP going in the same direction you are currently heading. Which by jobs numbers means you have to at a minimum see it flatten out.... with ZERO jobs lost.
A turn around can last 1000000 years, its still a turn around!
Glad I can challange you, intellectually!
ROFLMAO.... great, so we could be waiting 1000000 years for the economy to start growing again?
Seriously, you are a friggin moron. Take an economics class and at least educated yourself a little on what is going on. That might prevent you from making such a fool of yourself.
Supercandy, admit you have been owned!
LMAO... poor Jarod... I hope this is not your approach in the courtroom.
To go in the same direction for whatever time frame would most certainly NOT be a turnaround. It would be going in the same direction. Otherwise there would never be a time that we weren't in a 'turn around'.