G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
LOL, the Stoner Groaner can't even spell 'you're', 'effect' or 'masturbator' and claims to have a degree..
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
economy doing better than expected
- Thread starter Don Quixote
- Start date
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
You can weld a fence and spell, u deserve a cookie!
Keep groaning, Stoner Groaner. It's fucking hilarious.
P.S.; can you tell the forum how rich you are and how many degrees you have again? Thanks.
dixon76710
New member
Your the dumbest masters in anything. Did u go to school in Alabama.
How do you not get that if people are feeling more wealthy due to the stock market the vote the encumbent.
I got that part. How do you not get that this is not the "wealth effect", which has a specific meaning in economics. As well, Obama supporters are more concerned with unemployment compenstation and other governmental entitlements. Not so much stock market returns. Might win back some of his big corporate cronies who benefit from his government policies, but not so much voters.
dixon76710
New member
Your a fucking liar! Masters my ass! You don't know that economics affects politics. Masterbater maybe
I never claimed it did not. Its simply not the "wealth effect" in economics. Why dont you just put the term in google and stop making a fool of yourself.
The wealth effect is an economic term, referring to an increase (decrease) in spending that accompanies an increase (decrease) in perceived wealth
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_effect
AS OPPOSED to an increase in Obama supporters.
Are you still in school junior, your implying only poor people vote for Obama. Was that masters in economics at klan u?I got that part. How do you not get that this is not the "wealth effect", which has a specific meaning in economics. As well, Obama supporters are more concerned with unemployment compenstation and other governmental entitlements. Not so much stock market returns. Might win back some of his big corporate cronies who benefit from his government policies, but not so much voters.
dixon76710
New member
Are you still in school junior, your implying only poor people vote for Obama. Was that masters in economics at klan u?
At this point, the only implication is that you are a fool, who doesnt know a thing about economics, but is fond of using economic terms, that you have no clue as to their meaning.
The wealth effect is an economic term, referring to an increase (decrease) in spending that accompanies an increase (decrease) in perceived wealth
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_effect
Not an increase in support for a political candidate.
You are as dumb as a brick junior. So the economic reference are you better off than 4 years ago in politics is new to you?At this point, the only implication is that you are a fool, who doesnt know a thing about economics, but is fond of using economic terms, that you have no clue as to their meaning.
Not an increase in support for a political candidate.
dixon76710
New member
You are as dumb as a brick junior. So the economic reference are you better off than 4 years ago in politics is new to you?
No, Im saying that is not what is referred to as the "wealth effect". Revealing how you want to debate, anything other than the only thing I have disputed. Grasping for refuge in a strawman.