Economical Appropriation Of Genetic Procreated Results Occupying Space Ancestrally He

[serenity]

Intellectual maybes vs genetic ancestors in plain sight ignoring they only exist in plain sight.
what went wrong saving humanities since dawn of converting ancestors into social narrative characters on a world stage controlled cradle to grave of life cycles timed apart conceived to decomposed now?

Instinctive rhetorical question.^^^^ most intellectual minds will avoid discussing as they typecast me into something with subhuman intellect.

 

[Earl]

"...as they typecast me into something with subhuman intellect."

Um, indeed...and well deserved.

 

[serenity]

"...as they typecast me into something with subhuman intellect."

Um, indeed...and well deserved.

says a person that cannot navigate living as one of a kind without society telling him/her/heshe/shehe who it is cradle to grave.

 

[evince]

Beep bop op bop

Erick ding king op

Beep beep boing

Twit erk ding

 

[serenity]

Beep bop op bop

Erick ding king op

Beep beep boing

Twit erk ding

and it is said I don't make sense describing kinetic biological results evolving in plain sight without the advent of what if we debate what about they, them, and those people all 4 groups intellectually typecasting themselves beyond mutually evolving now as reproductive results naturally eternally separated here, not exceeding which, what, where, when, whom, how, and why alive geographically displaced living their social narrative by choice subjectively, objectively, relatively ignoring self contained to equally here, not equally talented, jut mutually timed apart since conceived.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

"...as they typecast me into something with subhuman intellect."

Um, indeed...and well deserved.

once they read one if it's posts they would never make the mistake of thinking it was something genetically procreated........more of a random computer generation using a program not given the option of verbs......