Eat meat and save the environment

Of course, only an uninformed dumbshit would buy the premise of the OP.

Agricultural is the number one source of methane, which is somewhere around 30x more powerful greenhouse gas than CO2. So, creating more demand only increases those emissions.

But, no surprises there, coming from the typical rightie.

30 times zero is still zero.

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.
You cannot create energy out of nothing. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.
You cannot trap heat, light, or thermal energy. You are still ignoring the 2nd law of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
 
I saw it as the feeble attempt at humor, but that’s what it was. Fucking feeble.
More proof the Leftist radical has no sense of humor.
Ag emissions are substsntial.
Yup. Love that natural manure smell...the smell of that piece of shit truck rolling coal at some city twit like you...
And, as K said, only an uniformed dumbshit would buy the premise. Did you miss that part?
YOU bought the premise! That's why you are posting your hate and anger! :laugh:
As for the methane facts I provided, you can look that up in a few seconds.
Not facts. Chants. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You are still ignoring the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
But you won’t. Why?
No need. I already know your stupid chants.
Because righties prefer to remain willfully ignorant of things that don’t fit in with their myopic worldview.
You just described the Church of Global Warming and yourself, being a member of it.
 
This is why, shit for brains!!

attachment.php

Absorption of infrared light emitted by Earth's surface does not warm the Earth.
 
Lol. You have no clue what you’re looking at, do you, Jethro.

I’ll repeat. Methane is 30x stronger as a greenhouse gas than CO2.

https://www.ces.fau.edu/nasa/module-2/how-greenhouse-effect-works.php

30 times zero is still zero.

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. Not even NASA can make it so.

You cannot create energy out of nothing.
You cannot trap heat.
You cannot trap light.
You cannot trap thermal energy. There is always heat.
You cannot heat the surface using a colder gas.

You are still ignoring the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law. So is NASA, by the way!
 
Contrails are manmade, and reasonable climate scientists who don't have a political agenda are saying that as much as 20% of anthropogenic change is due to them. Interestingly, contrails have only been around since the mid 1930's as that was the point where aircraft could fly high enough to create them.

Climate Effects of Contrails Confirmed
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-effects-of-contra/

Plane Contrails Have a Surprising Effect on Global Warming
https://www.wired.com/story/plane-contrails-surprising-effect-global-warming/

Airlines are finally admitting contrails are an environmental problem
https://phys.org/news/2022-12-airlines-contrails-environmental-problem.html

The fix to this is relatively simple to implement. Just route aircraft around, above, or below altitudes and areas where contrails are forming. This has been suggested by serious climate people.

On the other hand, those with a political agenda with regard to climate change ignore this problem entirely because there is no money or power to be gained from fixing it. That should tell you something about who to believe when it comes to Gorebal Warming.

Aircraft can create contrails at the surface just as well as at altitude.
Clouds are not capable of warming the Earth.

Nothing to 'fix'.
 
Interesting articles. Looks like easy fixes. Fly earlier rather than later. Fly higher. The contribution is then minimal.

People want to travel all during the day by air (and at night too!).
Planes can only fly so high. It costs more fuel the higher you fly.

There is nothing to fix. Clouds have no capability to warm the Earth.
 
Yep, but there's no money, control, or power in it. Easily done. Cheap to do. If it also fixes the problem, we could pull back bigtime on CO2 reduction allowing many more decades to do it at lower cost and without turning control of our lives over to government.

There is no 'problem'. It is NOT cheap to fly way out of the way. It is not possible to even reach many destinations without creating contrails. CO2 does not need to be reduced.
No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.
 
Junkscience is a pseudoscience, high quackery, right wing conspiracy site.

Predictable that you would cite it.

The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law which you ignore is NOT quackery or a 'right wing conspiracy'.

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.
 
Predictable that you are unable to refute the science. It's pretty basic stuff but obviously above your paygrade.

You are told that the methane Global Warming Potential (GWP) is around 20 times that of carbon dioxide and has a retention time in the atmosphere of around 10 years before hydroxy ions remove it. What you are not told, because it's used as a weapon by lowlife politicians and the scumbag media, is that it is essentially harmless due to the IR photons from the Earth's surface being already absorbed by water vapour. Pretty obvious why, you have the likes of Bernie Sanders et al wanting to ban fracking and fossil fuels, and various vegan groups wanting to ban meat production.This is a the perfect weapon for them, even though it's ocean gong bullshit!!

It really doesn't matter what photons emitted by the Earth are absorbed by whatever gas in the atmosphere. That does not warm the Earth. It takes energy to emit light. It takes thermal energy to emit light by conversion according to the Stefan-Boltzmann law. That acts to try to cool the surface. It does not warm it.
 
Does cloud cover effect or change the albedo of the planet?

No.
The emissivity of Earth is unknown. The presence of clouds do not affect it.

Albedo is the inverse of emissivity. Emissivity is also the same as absorbtivity. It is simply a measured constant of how well a surface emits or absorbs light as light is converted to thermal energy or as thermal energy is converted to light.

ALL frequencies of light are considered. There is no frequency term in the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

Only infrared light converts to thermal energy upon absorption. The absorption of visible light converts to chemical energy or ionization, not thermal energy at all.

Like the simple photosensor on an elevator door, or like in a plant, absorption of visible light does not convert to thermal energy.

It is not possible to measure the emissivity of Earth, because it is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.

It can seem that clouds have a warming effect, because we tend to see them form when there is warm air at the surface (well, warmer than the upper atmosphere!), and moisture is available (water vapor, invisible). The cloud itself is not water vapor. It is liquid water or ice. They are formed by warm air containing moisture, cools as it rises. Cold air can hold less water vapor than warm air, so some is 'squeezed out' and becomes visible liquid water. This tends to happen at the same altitude, which is why clouds tend to be flat on the bottom. As the air continues to rise, it takes that liquid water with it, creating a 'piled up' look to the top of the cloud (cumulus cloud).

Lines of cumulus clouds indicate a cold front. Cold air is coming in and tossing warm air aloft. This is why after such a front passes, it feels cooler. This type of front can also produce the more violent storms. Such air is said to be 'unstable' by meteorologists. This means the air is cooling faster with altitude than the normal adiabatic rate. Warm air easily rises into this colder air, once given something to start it moving. Air flowing over a mountain range can get it moving this way, which is why storms and clouds tend to appear on the windward side of a mountain range and it tends to be clearer on the leeward side. Cold fronts tend to be fast moving, and often generate thunderstorms and/or heavy rain or hail.

Stratus clouds form a little differently. These types of clouds are common in the Pacific Northwest. Warm air arrives over colder air, carrying with it moisture from the nearby sea. As it descends into the colder air slowly, a 'sheet' is formed at the point where the air can no longer retain that much moisture. It isn't a fast moving event. This is essentially a warm front, where warm air comes in over the top of cold air and settles into it. The air is said to be 'stable'. This kind of front is often stationary, hanging around for days. In the Pacific Northwest, it is almost continuous during the winters around here. This type of front can create what is called freezing rain. It's rain, but it's so cold it turns to ice when it strikes the ground, covering everything in a thick sheet of ice and literally gluing cars to the ground. Portland, OR has a lot of this kind of weather, due to it's proximity to the sea and the Gorge to the east, where cold air is arriving from eastern Oregon.

On the 'dry' side (eastern Washington and Oregon), snow is less, but it tends to be fluffier, due to the colder temperatures there in the winter.
On the 'wet' side (western Washington and Oregon), snow is greater, but tends to be wet and heavy. Some locals refer to it as 'Cascade Concrete'. It takes a certain skill to ski well in it!

In other words, that 'warming effect' is the cause of clouds, not the reverse.
 
Last edited:
“Pure” chemistry. Hilarious!

You seem dead set on showing everybody just how ignorant and boneheaded you are.

What Is Pure Chemistry?

Pure chemistry is the theoretical study of chemistry. The definition of pure chemistry is to focus on research to advance one's knowledge and understanding of a chemistry principle or process. The basis for pure chemistry is a curiosity about why something happens and investigating that cause.

https://study.com/learn/lesson/pure...oretical,happens and investigating that cause.
 
Dumbfuck, you had no clue what you were looking at when you posted the absorption spectrums of the greenhouse gases.

No coincidence that you would cite a pseudoscience, conspiracy site.

Run off kid. You’re late for your astrology class.

Those absorption signatures are accurate, dude. They can be verified on any spectroscopic analyzer.
Bulverism fallacy.

Absorption of infrared light emitted from the surface by any gas in the atmosphere does not warm the Earth.
 
I've already told you enough times that I have a degree in pure chemistry. Here is something else for you to ignore!

Impact of methane exaggerated --- its effects are masked by H2O
This is incorrect. The effects of methane or water vapor on the temperature of the planet is ZERO. No gas or vapor can create energy out of nothing, or trap heat, light, or thermal energy.
Vice president of the Science and Environment Policy Project (SEPP) (4/11/2014, Dr.Tom Sheahan, “Methane: The Irrelevant Greenhouse Gas; Water vapor has already absorbed the very same infrared radiation that Methane might have absorbed,”
This is incorrect. There is no layering of the atmosphere here. Nothing blocks anything else. Absorption of infrared light emitted from the surface of the Earth cannot warm the Earth.
 
The Jews did not think gentiles were clean. This passage is an allegory meant to tell Peter that the gentiles were not unclean and to take the message to the gentiles and Peter did. That is something that the Jews would not do before. The passage's true meaning is not about Peter's diet it is about taking the message to gentiles. .


Act 10:22

¶And they said, Cornelius the centurion, a just man, and one that feareth God, and of good report among all the nation of the Jews, was warned from God by an holy angel to send for thee into his house, and to hear words of thee.

Act 10:23

Then called he them in, and lodged them. And on the morrow Peter went away with them, and certain brethren from Joppa accompanied him.


Cornelius (Greek: Κορνήλιος, romanized: Kornélios; Latin: Cornelius) was a Roman centurion who is considered by some Christians to be the first Gentile to convert to the faith

The Jews were not supposed to be cannibals either.
 
Back
Top