E-Mails Show Rove's Role in U.S. Attorney Firings

uscitizen

Villified User
EXCLUSIVE: E-Mails Show Rove's Role in U.S. Attorney Firings
White House Asserts E-Mails Are Consistent With Its Original Statements on the Controversy

By JAN CRAWFORD GREENBURG

March 15, 2007 — New unreleased emails from top administration officials show the idea of firing all 93 U.S. attorneys was raised by Karl Rove in early January 2005, indicating Rove was more involved in the plan than previously acknowledged by the White House. The e-mails also show Alberto Gonzales discussed the idea of firing the attorneys en masse while he was still White House counsel—weeks before he was confirmed as attorney general.

The e-mails directly contradict White House assertions that the notion originated with recently departed White House counsel Harriet Miers and was her idea alone.

However, according to a senior White House official who has seen the e-mail exchange the Justice Department is preparing to release, "It does not contradict what we have said and it's not inconsistent with what we have said."

Two independent sources in a position to know have described the contents of the email exchange, which could be released as early as tomorrow. They put Rove at the epicenter of the imbroglio and raise questions about Gonzales' explanations of the matter.

The e-mail exchange, the official says, is one dated Jan.y 6, 2005 and is between then-deputy White House Counsel David Leitch and Kyle Sampson at the Justice Department.New unreleased e-mails from top administration officials show that the idea of firing all 93 U.S. attorneys was raised by White House adviser Karl Rove in early January 2005, indicating Rove was more involved in the plan than the White House previously acknowledged.

According to a senior White House official who has seen the e-mail exchange the Justice Department is preparing to release, "It does not contradict what we have said and it's not inconsistent with what we have said."

The e-mails also show that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales discussed the idea of firing the attorneys en masse weeks before he was confirmed as attorney general.

The e-mails directly contradict White House assertions that the notion originated with recently departed White House counsel Harriet Miers, and was her idea alone.

Two independent sources in a position to know have described the contents of the e-mail exchange, which could be released as early as Friday. They put Rove at the epicenter of the imbroglio and raise questions about Gonzales' explanations of the matter.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2954988&page=1

YES! I would love to see the pudgy slimeball bite the dust.
 
I don't know how this could be, because the White House let it be known that Rove had nothing to do with it and it was all that incompetent Harriet Mier's fault.

You remember her...not that long ago she was so competent that she was the best choice to be on the Supreme Court of the United States of America.
 
more meaningless rantings about nothing from the left.
I hope the piling on doesn't backfire because the left looks right now invinsible in 08.
I hope they are, but the pendulum will have to swing to substantive from the current sublimely irrelavant
 
more meaningless rantings about nothing from the left.

White House Backs Off on Miers Scenario

Mar 16, 12:14 PM (ET)

By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS

WASHINGTON (AP) - The White House on Friday backed off its earlier contention that then-White House Counsel Harriet Miers first raised the idea of firing U.S. attorneys - an act that led to a firestorm of criticism of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

"It has been described as her idea but ... I don't want to try to vouch for origination," said White House press secretary Tony Snow, who previously had asserted Miers was the person who came up with the idea. "At this juncture, people have hazy memories."

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070316/D8NTC5F00.html
 
Of course you are right Spin we have come to expect nothing but lies form this administration of personal responsibility.
 
Back
Top