Due to partisanship, Democrats can't stop Trump's cabinet nominees,

archives

Verified User
but what they have been very successful at is exposing the questionable integrity and competence of a lot of Trump's choices and thereby lowering the already weak ethical reputation of the Trump Administration

Heard of any Grizzle Bear attacks on schools lately?
 
but what they have been very successful at is exposing the questionable integrity and competence of a lot of Trump's choices and thereby lowering the already weak ethical reputation of the Trump Administration

Heard of any Grizzle Bear attacks on schools lately?
you mean due to Harry Reid's partisanship?
 
you mean due to Harry Reid's partisanship?


Harry Reid is gone, you people got to get away from the "Obama's fault," "Clinton's fault,"" Ried and Pelosi's fault," deflections, it's all about the Don now, no more scapegoats, GOP is in charge
 
Harry Reid is gone, you people got to get away from the "Obama's fault," "Clinton's fault,"" Ried and Pelosi's fault," deflections, it's all about the Don now, no more scapegoats, GOP is in charge

Leaving aside the total and complete irony of your statement the reason Republicans can push through Trump's appointees is because of Harry Reid.
 
Leaving aside the total and complete irony of your statement the reason Republicans can push through Trump's appointees is because of Harry Reid.


Still don't get it, Reid or no Reid, the nominees will be pushed thru in 2017 because of partisanship, 52/48, fact, got nothing to do with Harry Reid, this is today, 2017, everything isn't Obama's, Clinton's, Reid nor Pelosi's fault
 
Still don't get it, Reid or no Reid, the nominees will be pushed thru in 2017 because of partisanship, 52/48, fact, got nothing to do with Harry Reid, this is today, 2017, everything isn't Obama's, Clinton's, Reid nor Pelosi's fault

How old are you? Have you never seen a President's appointees go through this process before?
 
Still don't get it, Reid or no Reid, the nominees will be pushed thru in 2017 because of partisanship, 52/48, fact, got nothing to do with Harry Reid, this is today, 2017, everything isn't Obama's, Clinton's, Reid nor Pelosi's fault

You are dumb, without the nuclear option as passed by Reid a three fifths majority would be needed, which means 60 votes would be needed. Your complete ignorance is massive, do you wear a colostomy bag like Clinton?
 
Still don't get it, Reid or no Reid, the nominees will be pushed thru in 2017 because of partisanship, 52/48, fact, got nothing to do with Harry Reid, this is today, 2017, everything isn't Obama's, Clinton's, Reid nor Pelosi's fault

You aren't doing well. You should drop it.
 
but what they have been very successful at is exposing the questionable integrity and competence of a lot of Trump's choices and thereby lowering the already weak ethical reputation of the Trump Administration

Heard of any Grizzle Bear attacks on schools lately?

That's fine with me. Let's see how these people perform. Probably a lot like Bush's "Brownie".
 
Still don't get it, Reid or no Reid, the nominees will be pushed thru in 2017 because of partisanship, 52/48, fact, got nothing to do with Harry Reid, this is today, 2017, everything isn't Obama's, Clinton's, Reid nor Pelosi's fault

Harry's rules......


“Elections have consequences”
 
Harry Reid is gone, you people got to get away from the "Obama's fault," "Clinton's fault,"" Ried and Pelosi's fault," deflections, it's all about the Don now, no more scapegoats, GOP is in charge
can we still blame Bush? It worked the last 8 years.
 
Harry Reid is gone, you people got to get away from the "Obama's fault," "Clinton's fault,"" Ried and Pelosi's fault," deflections, it's all about the Don now, no more scapegoats, GOP is in charge
So Obama and dems blaming Bush for nearly 8 years is acceptable, but 4 days into Trumps presidency, he and the pubs own it.

Typical liberal hypocrisy.
 
Back
Top