Yeah, sure. And I am also sure that the check is in the mail...right?As a Trump supporter if Obama sent some Choppers to pick up Maduro and turn Venezuela into an ally overnight I would have supported that.
Yeah, sure. And I am also sure that the check is in the mail...right?As a Trump supporter if Obama sent some Choppers to pick up Maduro and turn Venezuela into an ally overnight I would have supported that.
Agreed. Not just to save American lives and American tax dollars, but to reduce prices at home. $6/gallon gasoline is not what American voters voted for.Im rooting for the American people who do not want this very unnecessary war.
Closing off the entrances is a temporary solution, but not a permanent one. It depends on Trump's end game....if he has one. LOLI read the Iranian drone factory is way under the ground and safe from our attacks. They are working hard to keep the supply going. A general said they would need ground troops to take out the factory.
Derpity Damper Dumperyou read something that fits your desired outcome, so it is obviously true
The US is a net energy exporter. It's our allies who will quickly suffer losing 25% of the world's oil, but we'll suffer in the long run from higher prices.We have all the oil we need if we redirect local production.
Japan is probably the worst hit by this and they have enough oil to last 9 months. China is the next but they have 1 billion barrels of oil in their SPR.The US is a net energy exporter. It's our allies who will quickly suffer losing 25% of the world's oil, but we'll suffer in the long run from higher prices.
EXACTLY. How sick is that!when you take into account that these people are actively rooting against us in the war so they can win elections, these threads make more sense
Do we REALLY have to explain the objective to you? Are you honestly THAT dumb? A child would know what are objectives are.We are so screwed! Notice how the trumptards here aren't even admitting we're at war! "We're just bombing people" I guess - I guess we could call it a "boom boom party"? I don't know - @IBDaMann - what do you want to call it, since we're "not at war'?
Yeah, right. You don't have a clue.Do we REALLY have to explain the objective to you? Are you honestly THAT dumb? A child would know what are objectives are.
GW predicted a quick end to the Iraq War and he was correct; it was over five weeks, but winning the peace never happened.Japan is probably the worst hit by this and they have enough oil to last 9 months. China is the next but they have 1 billion barrels of oil in their SPR.
I doubt this thing will last 1 month. Maybe not even 2 weeks. By this weekend or early next week Pakistani forces will be invading southeast Iran to absorb the baluchs and the Azerbaijani will be moving in from the Northwest to absrorb the Azeri and possibly the kurds.
I am very curious what the Kurds will do.Japan is probably the worst hit by this and they have enough oil to last 9 months. China is the next but they have 1 billion barrels of oil in their SPR.
I doubt this thing will last 1 month. Maybe not even 2 weeks. By this weekend or early next week Pakistani forces will be invading southeast Iran to absorb the baluchs and the Azerbaijani will be moving in from the Northwest to absrorb the Azeri and possibly the kurds.
I thought we already did that. Back in June trump told us he'd "totally eradicated" the threat?O.k dumb fucks,....here goes.
Objectives....
1...To neutralize the Iranian military response with the goal of less death and destruction Vrs a protracted boots on the ground war,
There are 90 million people in Iran. They are not a monolith. Millions of them are actually mourning the death of the evil Ayatolla.2...To instill enuff confidence in the Iranian citizenship so that they rise up and take charge of their own country as around 80% of the population was against the now defunct "and dead" old regime.
Has that offer been made, or did you just pull it out of your fat ass?3...To offer amnesty to all Iranian military, police, govt officials, and even Republican guard who jump the fence and join they're fellow countrymen in a free Iran.
Pie in the sky.4....Once this is accomplished there will be not only a free Iran but also a pro west/pro American Iran.
If any of this happens, I'll come congratulate you. But none of it will. Just like Republicans got us into two other quagmires in the mideast, they figured, "it's been awhile - let's fuck the world again!".5....By not having Iranian oil money to support terror anymore the terror networks and groups like Hezbollah will shrink in numbers very quickly. Terror NEEDS funding,...a Free Iran will turn off the money pipelines.
It is the hope of the administration that these goals can be achieved thru the air campaign,....I think it can. And quickly too. But, we are going to have to give them an Iranian figure to rally around,....someone who is KNOWN and has existing support. My bet is as soon as the bombing slows to nothing,...maybe another week or so,...we will trot out Prince Reza Palavi who is already quite popular there. This will be the beginnings of a free Iran.........
O.K Lurch,...you dumb bastard you,,....are you satisfied now. THOSE are the objectives. And NO,...I am not guessing,....I KNOW those are the objectives.
The closest thing to a blackhawk I've been in is a hip and I can't imagine trying to shoot down multiple small targets (I think the drones are less than 3 meters) with an unstablized door gun. I mean both platforms would be moving in 3 dimensions and you wouldn't be looking at short range shots either. I suppose if you put enough bullets in the air you're bound to get lucky occasionally but it doesn't seem like a viable solution to me.The drones fly at about 100 kts. A UH-60 Blackhawk helicopter cruises at about 150 kts. A door gunner could shoot it down.
There are a few problems such as having radar able to spot the inbound drones and being able to intercept over unpopulated areas.
First rule of flying "What goes up, must come down". Shooting bullets over populated areas is a bad idea and very unpopular with the locals.
Another problem is numbers. There's only so many helicopters and Iran could launch a swarm to overwhelm defenses. All they need is one or two to get through and take out a high value target.
It helps that the drones are flying in a straight line. They do not autonomously engage in dogfighting like a WWI. It's being able to intercept, get up alongside and put a few rounds through it....and not shoot down other helicopters doing the same.The closest thing to a blackhawk I've been in is a hip and I can't imagine trying to shoot down multiple small targets (I think the drones are less than 3 meters) with an unstablized door gun. I mean both platforms would be moving in 3 dimensions and you wouldn't be looking at short range shots either. I suppose if you put enough bullets in the air you're bound to get lucky occasionally but it doesn't seem like a viable solution to me.
That was the nuclear sites Dummy. I said military threat,...meaning air, sea, land.I thought we already did that. Back in June trump told us he'd "totally eradicated" the threat?
I'm sorry - you claim to think to know what trump's talking about? You can't. No one does, moron.That was the nuclear sites Dummy. I said military threat,...meaning air, sea, land.
Many MANY millions more are cheering his death.There are 90 million people in Iran. They are not a monolith. Millions of them are actually mourning the death of the evil Ayatolla.