Drone Strikes Kill 'AQ Core' Leadership

anatta

100% recycled karma
The Pentagon says a U.S. strike has killed a core al-Qaida leader with ties to Ayman al-Zawahiri and deceased al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden.

Abu Hani al-Masri was killed in a drone strike on February 4 while riding in a vehicle near Idlib, Syria, a defense official told VOA Wednesday. He is the fourth al-Qaida leader killed in Syria this year, according to the official.

Al-Masri, who also went by the name Hani Jasarevic, was a founding member of Egyptian Islamic Jihadist (EIJ), the first Sunni group to use suicide bombers in their terror attacks.

The Pentagon says EIJ has attempted multiple attacks against American and allied facilities, including a 1998 attempt to blow up the U.S. embassy in Albania.

Al-Masri also oversaw the creation and operation of al-Qaida training camps in Afghanistan in the 1980s and '90s, where the Pentagon said he “recruited, indoctrinated, trained and equipped thousands of terrorists.”

An earlier U.S. strike on February 3 killed 10 al-Qaida terrorists in a building that was being used as an al-Qaida meeting place, according to the Pentagon.

“These strikes disrupt al-Qaida's ability to plot and direct external attacks targeting the U.S. and our interests worldwide,” Pentagon spokesman Navy Captain Jeff Davis said.
http://www.voanews.com/a/pentagon-s...-al-masri-killed-in-drone-strike/3715613.html
 
not really. Kill one roach and a couple of more come out the woodwork :)
sometimes. sometimes killing really bad guys ( and this one was AQ Core of you know the meaning)
results in real disruption of networks - like killing a queen of a colony ..

It's this "all drone strikes are bad mentality" that lead to doing no effective counterterrorism -
that is in itself counter productive.

Basic criteria;
1. go after those who are part of real threat matrix
2.not locals engaged in civil wars with no intention beyond
3. absolutely no signature strikes
 
Why didn't you start threads like this during the Obama admin?
I did. not here. I posted mostly on DCJ. I came up with my own criteria which I think is sound based on reading counter-terrorism strategies (RAND/US Army War College - various foreign affairs & Long War Journal to start) and taking into account the "creating terrorists" critique which is valid.

The drone strikes must be accurate, with emphasis on reduction of collateral damage , and no signature strikes which are basically shots in the dark,and the target has to have great enough value to justify things going bad - if they do so...IOW's "high value" targets only where the strike meets that criteria
 
I did. not here. I posted mostly on DCJ. I came up with my own criteria which I think is sound based on reading counter-terrorism strategies (RAND/US Army War College - various foreign affairs & Long War Journal to start) and taking into account the "creating terrorists" critique which is valid.

The drone strikes must be accurate, with emphasis on reduction of collateral damage , and no signature strikes which are basically shots in the dark,and the target has to have great enough value to justify things going bad - if they do so...IOW's "high value" targets only where the strike meets that criteria
Brilliant.
Base your behaviour on a neo-con propaganda site.
 
Brilliant.
Base your behaviour on a neo-con propaganda site.
counter-terrorism is not nation building, is not counter insurgency..
you would do well to do a little homework before burping up nonsensical responses
 
sometimes. sometimes killing really bad guys ( and this one was AQ Core of you know the meaning)
results in real disruption of networks - like killing a queen of a colony ..

It's this "all drone strikes are bad mentality" that lead to doing no effective counterterrorism -
that is in itself counter productive.

Basic criteria;
1. go after those who are part of real threat matrix
2.not locals engaged in civil wars with no intention beyond
3. absolutely no signature strikes

Look who's suddenly become a convert to drone strikes when he used to rant and rail about how awful they are.

And your bogus criteria would be impossible to adhere to.

You're just another pro-Shlump hypocrite.
 
Back
Top