Driving While Black, Flying While Arab, Walking While Latino

signalmankenneth

Verified User
By Marcia Alesan Dawkins, Ph.D.

Driving while Black. Flying while Arab. Walking while Latino (in Arizona). Not everyone has to worry about raising “reasonable suspicion” in all these settings. As someone who does, I’ve come to appreciate the complex natures of race, identity and a sense of belonging in the U.S. From “random” security checks, to unnecessary delays, to getting escorted off planes, to general harassment, I’ve seen it all. No matter how American I might feel inside, these experiences coupled with the questions “Where are you from?” or “What are you?” remind me that I’m not “really American” and that I will always be viewed as a stranger.

As a child I remember being in the car with my father and getting stopped several times for speeding tickets. Though my Dad undeniably had a lead foot, I always wondered why we got stopped so much. It wasn’t until I was older and learned about racial profiling as a technology of modern policing that I figured it out. According to Professor Oscar Gandy, “racial profiling is characterized as a troubled technology because of the way in which the use of racial identification as an index of criminality contributes to the cumulative disadvantage that shapes the life chances of African Americans.”

In other words, there is physical, psychological and economic danger present when law enforcement agencies use racial classification to identify people as members of a suspect class that is subject to special attention by the police. There is also the danger of differing perceptions. According to a 2004 Gallup poll, “perceptions about the prevalence of racial profiling differ by racial and ethnic group — Hispanics and blacks generally believe it is more common than whites. For example, a majority of black Americans (67%) feel racial profiling is widespread in traffic stops, a sentiment shared by nearly the same percentage of Hispanic Americans (63%). By contrast, only half (50%) of non-Hispanic whites feel the practice is widespread.”

Because of my physical features I could always pass as white and, as a result, didn’t experience discrimination behind the wheel. That’s part of why I always perceived myself to be an unhyphenated American. Of course, that was until—allow me to use a trite cliché—September 11th changed everything. It used to be the case that after I told people about my origins, I would invariably hear a “bucket list” of wishes to visit the pyramids and east desserts such as basbousa. The reaction has changed. Now, like Moustafa Bayoumi, upon telling people I’m of Arab descent, “I can usually see the news headlines and maps of the Middle East overlapping in their minds.” This in unsurprising considering that the latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that “59% of adults say factors such as race, ethnicity and overall appearance should be used to determine which boarding passengers to search at airports.” I guess that seems just when it’s not your race, ethnicity or overall appearance that consistently qualifies you for a “random” search.

Then there’s the experience of traveling in Arizona in the wake of Senate Bill 1070 as I did recently. As context, the law states that it is meant to “work together to discourage and deter the unlawful entry and presence of aliens and economic activity by persons unlawfully present in the U.S.” This law has raised many questions. Some seem straightforward, like who is considered an “alien” and how “unlawful presence” is determined. Some questions are more complex, like what counts as “reasonable suspicion,” a “practicable” situation and “reasonable attempts … to determine immigration status.” Though I don’t have a Latino-sounding name or accent, I wondered what might happen if I was unable to produce my passport and/or birth certificate for the first time while traveling domestically. Given that “more than three-quarters of Americans have heard about the state of Arizona’s new immigration law, and of these, 51% say they favor it,” I can say that for the first time I felt truly illegitimate in the eyes of my fellow citizens.

So, what do these uniquely American experiences with racial and ethnic profiling have to do with the Middle East right now? Upon first glance, not so much. Upon reflection, a lot. The increasing rates of interracial relationships and the impact of globalization are impacting us because of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, much like our society was affected by the wars in Vietnam and South East Asia. After those wars were over, a population of multiracial children was rejected by both of their parents’ countries for many reasons. One main reason is because their racial and ethnic profiles reminded us of injustices committed in the U.S. and abroad. I am afraid that the interracial families that emerge from our current wars will be similarly rejected. How will they be incorporated into an Arab and/or Muslim society or assimilated into the United States? Most likely, with difficulty and with plenty of profiling. Without awareness about the dangers of racial and ethnic profiling, there will be a new generation of people like me…searched randomly as they’re driving while black, flying while Arab, and walking while Latino. A generation of people who are multiracial, multicultural, multilingual, multiethnic and multinational—“real” Americans, all too often deterred and discouraged as “aliens.”

az-this-white.jpg
 
Driving While Black, Flying While Arab, Walking While Latino, and posting while being an ignorant Liberal asswipe, who's biggest contribution is posting asinine pictures.
 
By Marcia Alesan Dawkins, Ph.D.

Driving while Black. Flying while Arab. Walking while Latino (in Arizona). Not everyone has to worry about raising “reasonable suspicion” in all these settings. As someone who does, I’ve come to appreciate the complex natures of race, identity and a sense of belonging in the U.S. From “random” security checks, to unnecessary delays, to getting escorted off planes, to general harassment, I’ve seen it all. No matter how American I might feel inside, these experiences coupled with the questions “Where are you from?” or “What are you?” remind me that I’m not “really American” and that I will always be viewed as a stranger.

As a child I remember being in the car with my father and getting stopped several times for speeding tickets. Though my Dad undeniably had a lead foot, I always wondered why we got stopped so much. It wasn’t until I was older and learned about racial profiling as a technology of modern policing that I figured it out. According to Professor Oscar Gandy, “racial profiling is characterized as a troubled technology because of the way in which the use of racial identification as an index of criminality contributes to the cumulative disadvantage that shapes the life chances of African Americans.”

In other words, there is physical, psychological and economic danger present when law enforcement agencies use racial classification to identify people as members of a suspect class that is subject to special attention by the police. There is also the danger of differing perceptions. According to a 2004 Gallup poll, “perceptions about the prevalence of racial profiling differ by racial and ethnic group — Hispanics and blacks generally believe it is more common than whites. For example, a majority of black Americans (67%) feel racial profiling is widespread in traffic stops, a sentiment shared by nearly the same percentage of Hispanic Americans (63%). By contrast, only half (50%) of non-Hispanic whites feel the practice is widespread.”

Because of my physical features I could always pass as white and, as a result, didn’t experience discrimination behind the wheel. That’s part of why I always perceived myself to be an unhyphenated American. Of course, that was until—allow me to use a trite cliché—September 11th changed everything. It used to be the case that after I told people about my origins, I would invariably hear a “bucket list” of wishes to visit the pyramids and east desserts such as basbousa. The reaction has changed. Now, like Moustafa Bayoumi, upon telling people I’m of Arab descent, “I can usually see the news headlines and maps of the Middle East overlapping in their minds.” This in unsurprising considering that the latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that “59% of adults say factors such as race, ethnicity and overall appearance should be used to determine which boarding passengers to search at airports.” I guess that seems just when it’s not your race, ethnicity or overall appearance that consistently qualifies you for a “random” search.

Then there’s the experience of traveling in Arizona in the wake of Senate Bill 1070 as I did recently. As context, the law states that it is meant to “work together to discourage and deter the unlawful entry and presence of aliens and economic activity by persons unlawfully present in the U.S.” This law has raised many questions. Some seem straightforward, like who is considered an “alien” and how “unlawful presence” is determined. Some questions are more complex, like what counts as “reasonable suspicion,” a “practicable” situation and “reasonable attempts … to determine immigration status.” Though I don’t have a Latino-sounding name or accent, I wondered what might happen if I was unable to produce my passport and/or birth certificate for the first time while traveling domestically. Given that “more than three-quarters of Americans have heard about the state of Arizona’s new immigration law, and of these, 51% say they favor it,” I can say that for the first time I felt truly illegitimate in the eyes of my fellow citizens.

So, what do these uniquely American experiences with racial and ethnic profiling have to do with the Middle East right now? Upon first glance, not so much. Upon reflection, a lot. The increasing rates of interracial relationships and the impact of globalization are impacting us because of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, much like our society was affected by the wars in Vietnam and South East Asia. After those wars were over, a population of multiracial children was rejected by both of their parents’ countries for many reasons. One main reason is because their racial and ethnic profiles reminded us of injustices committed in the U.S. and abroad. I am afraid that the interracial families that emerge from our current wars will be similarly rejected. How will they be incorporated into an Arab and/or Muslim society or assimilated into the United States? Most likely, with difficulty and with plenty of profiling. Without awareness about the dangers of racial and ethnic profiling, there will be a new generation of people like me…searched randomly as they’re driving while black, flying while Arab, and walking while Latino. A generation of people who are multiracial, multicultural, multilingual, multiethnic and multinational—“real” Americans, all too often deterred and discouraged as “aliens.”

az-this-white.jpg

Well, now that you're on a roll, why not actually THINK about what you're saying .... and WHY these things are happening.....

WHO the fuck are the terrorists by about a huge ratio ?
Arabs? Folks from the Middle East ? Muslims ? or Swedes, Polocks, or Jamaicans...

WHO the hell are dealing/selling/using drugs by a large margin in most big cities ?
Could that possibly be African Americans, street gangs. ?

WHO are by far the illegal aliens ?....
Well, holy shit, that might by be Latinos...Mexicans, Guatemalans, Hondurans,
Ecuadorians...etc....

I didn't say all terrorists are Arabs, or all drug dealers/users are AF, or all illegals are Latinos....but god damn dude, get a clue....

When the cops warn the public that a rapists is in your area and are afraid to say its a black rapist, or a white rapist, or a Hispanic rapist, that is pretty damn stupid....why the hell bother giving the warning at all....

What you consider 'profiling' many of us consider good ole common sense....there just ain't that many little old white ladies hijacking airplanes, dealing drugs or entering the US illegally....

Things are the way they are for damn good reasons in most cases....
 
Last edited:
Actually latest statistics show only about 20-25% of our illegal immigrants are Hispanic in origin.

Really? Well show us your link to these interesting statistics....

what far ultra left-wing website did you get your information from ?
 
Which is precisely why the AZ law is NOT racial profiling... Thank you!

You apparently ignored the or part of my comment.

The first version definitely would have lead to racial profiling. The amended version will still result in racial profiling. The police will see that a person is Hispanic then find some reason to stop them. Same thing that happens in "driving while black" stops.

What traits are the police to look for in a suspect of illegal immigration?
 
You apparently ignored the or part of my comment.

The first version definitely would have lead to racial profiling. The amended version will still result in racial profiling. The police will see that a person is Hispanic then find some reason to stop them. Same thing that happens in "driving while black" stops.

What traits are the police to look for in a suspect of illegal immigration?

Since you feel this will lead to abuse, I have thre questions:
1 - What law(s) do you know of, that don't have the ability to be abused
2 - Why do you automatically assume that this will be abused
3 - What is your solution to the illegal immigration situation
 
Since you feel this will lead to abuse, I have thre questions:
1 - What law(s) do you know of, that don't have the ability to be abused
2 - Why do you automatically assume that this will be abused
3 - What is your solution to the illegal immigration situation

1 - None, that I can think of. This law encourages racial profiling because race will, no doubt, be a primary factor in determining whether someone fits the bill as an illegal immigrant and the cops can be sued.
2 - Answered above.
3 - I have already stated this numerous times. Make it much easier to enter legally, remain legally and to become a citizen. Deport those who violate the law anyway. I am actually ONLY opposed to illegal immigration, while you folks pretend that that's all you oppose, while supporting high barriers to legal immigration. With the exception of nAHZi, you are all full of shit.
 
1 - None, that I can think of. This law encourages racial profiling because race will, no doubt, be a primary factor in determining whether someone fits the bill as an illegal immigrant and the cops can be sued.
2 - Answered above.
3 - I have already stated this numerous times. Make it much easier to enter legally, remain legally and to become a citizen. Deport those who violate the law anyway. I am actually ONLY opposed to illegal immigration, while you folks pretend that that's all you oppose, while supporting high barriers to legal immigration. With the exception of nAHZi, you are all full of shit.

1 - And of course you would feel the same, if this law had been passed in the State of Washington where illegal Canadians might be. I take it you feel that all Hispanics are brown.
2 - Well since you know it will be abused, then I guess it's a done deal.
3 - So how low do you wnat the barrier to be set, in order to make it "easier".
 
1 - And of course you would feel the same, if this law had been passed in the State of Washington where illegal Canadians might be.

Yes. There are many Canadians in our country illegally. I would guess there are probably some in Arizona. Do you think Arizona cops will be harassing people with hockey paraphernalia?

I take it you feel that all Hispanics are brown.

No. So what? They won't pull over the light skinned ones so that makes it okay?

2 - Well since you know it will be abused, then I guess it's a done deal.

Wasn't the point of question one, that all laws are abused or may be potentially abused? You know damn well that suspicion of illegal residence will fall mainly on Hispanics. What other trait would one look for?

3 - So how low do you wnat the barrier to be set, in order to make it "easier".

No quotas. The only thing that needs to be checked for is disease or a record of violent criminal activity. That will reduce the costs of compliance, which is a major barrier. There should be little reason to deny anyone, that was allowed entry and who has not violated the law while here, citizenship.
 
The police will see that a person is Hispanic then find some reason to stop them.


what kind of idiot just makes shit like this up in their premise while arguing a point. Are we really supposed to take this serious?
 
Back
Top