Dreamliner?? More like a nightmare liner!!

cancel2 2022

Canceled
An electrical fire onboard a Boeing 787 aircraft has prompted further concerns about the Dreamliner's delayed introduction.
The Japan Air Lines jet filled with smoke after arriving at Boston, following a non-stop flight from Tokyo.The fire chief at Logan airport said a a fault occurred in the battery pack for the plane's auxiliary power unit, which runs the jet's electrical systems when it is not getting power from its engines.

Fire crews using infrared equipment found flames in a small compartment in the plane's belly and had the fire out in about 20 minutes, he said.
Massachusetts Port Authority's fire chief Bob Donahue said there was a flare-up later when a rechargeable battery exploded. He said it was too soon to know the cause.


About 15 minutes after all 173 passengers and 11 crew members had disembarked, a mechanic spotted light smoke in the cockpit and cabin.
"When we arrived, it was a heavy smoke, and that was in three minutes, so this was advancing," Mr Donahue said. The model was originally planned for launch in 2009 but production has been beset with technical problems. It was first delivered in late 2011. In November 2010, a test flight had to make an emergency landing after an in-flight electrical fire - delaying test flights for several weeks.


Last month, a United Airlines 787 flying from Texas to New Jersey diverted to New Orleans because of an electrical problem with a power distribution panel. The head of Qatar Airways recently criticised Boeing after its delivery-delayed planes were grounded for five days because of the electrical faults. It came as the US aviation watchdog discovered fuel line assembly errors. It said that the faults could result in fire risk from leaks dripping on hot engine parts or causing the aircraft to run out of fuel.


British Airways has ordered 24 Dreamliners from Boeing and is still expecting its first 787 in May, with a further three due for delivery before the end of 2013. Virgin Atlantic has 16 Dreamliners on order and told Sky News it still expects its first delivery in 2014. Thomson Airways has also placed orders for the hi-tech long-haul Boeing plane, which has been marketed as being more comfortable and environmentally friendly than other aircraft.

A spokeswoman for Thomson told Sky News: "Our first Thomson Dreamliner is still on track to be delivered early this year. Boeing has reassured us that they are taking action to rectify the issues highlighted to them."

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/boeing-787-dreamliner-catches-fire-boston-094042405--finance.html
 
The list of woes goes on and on!!

US federal regulators are ordering a comprehensive review of Boeing's brand-new fleet of 787 Dreamliners, after a string of scares struck the state-of-the-art passenger jet in a week.

The Federal Aviation Administration finally launched the probe after a crack appeared in a cockpit window during a domestic All Nippon Airways flight in Japan today.
The review is an embarrassing setback to the plane that was heralded as the future of aviation, after four separate malfunctions occurred this week alone, including a brake failure, a fuel leak and an on-board fire.

The FAA says the review will include the design, manufacture and assembly of the aircraft.

THE BOEING DREAMLINER 787: A HISTORY OF FAILURES AND DELAYS

December 2003 - Boeing announces that a new state-of-the-art plane would be assembled in its factory in Everett, Washington.
January 2005 - Boeing designates its new plane the 787, announcing that the high-tech jet will enter service in May 2008.
December 2006 - The first six 787s are revealed to be overweight.
September 5 2007 - Boeing announces a three-month delay, blaming a shortage of fasteners as well as incomplete software
October 11 2007 - Boeing announces delay of six months due to production problems, pushing first delivery back to December 2008.
January 16 2008 - Boeing announces a third three-month delay, citing insufficient progress on 'traveled work'.
April 9 2008 - Boeing officially announces a fourth delay, shifting the maiden flight to the fourth quarter of 2008, and delaying initial deliveries by around 15 months to the third quarter of 2009.
November 4, 2008 - The company announces a fifth delay due to incorrect fastener installation and the Boeing machinists strike, stating that the first test flight would not occur in the fourth quarter of 2008.
December 11 2008 - Boeing acknowledges a sixth delay of six-months with first delivery scheduled for early 2010.
June 2009 - Boeing stuns the industry by postponing the first flight indefinitely after engineers find structural flaws.
August 2010 - Another delay announced, citing engine delivery issues from Rolls Royce.
November 2010 - A test flight is forced into an emergency landing in Laredo, Texas, after crew notice smoke in the cabin.
October 11 2011 - First commercial flight of Boeing 787 Dreamliner from Narita, Japan, to Hong Kong on All Nippon Airways.
February 6 2012 - Boeing reports signs of 'delamination' occurring on a support structure in the Dreamliner's rear fuselage, launching an inspection.
July 11 2012 - A fire breaks out in the ground power unit beneath a Qatar Airways Boeing Dreamliner at the Farnborough Airshow.
July 30 2012 - Debris from a brand-new Dreamliner's engine sparks a fire at a South Carolina airport forcing emergency crews to close the Charleston International Airport for more than an hour.
September 15 2012 - NTSB requests the grounding of certain 787s due to GE engine failures.
December 4 2012 - United Airlines' brand-new Dreamliner, carrying 174 passengers and 10 crew, is forced to make an emergency landing in New Orleans due to a mechanical issue.
December 13 2012 - Qatar Airways grounds one of its Dreamliners after several similar faults caused electrical problems.
January 9 2013 - All Nippon Airlines is forced to cancel a domestic flight to Tokyo after a computer wrongly indicated a problem with the 787's brakes.
January 7 2013 - A Dreamliner catches fire after dropping off 183 passengers and crew in Boston when a battery in the jet's auxiliary power system overheated.
January 8 2013 - A fuel leak forces a Japan Airlines-operated 787 to cancel takeoff at Boston's Logan International Airport.
January 11 2013 - The Federal Aviation Administration launch a review after a crack appeares in a cockpit window during a domestic All Nippon Airways flight in Japan.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2260733/Aviation-regulators-demand-safety-review-Boeing-787-Dreamliners-series-mechanical-structural-
 
Last edited:
The list of woes goes on and on!!

US federal regulators are ordering a comprehensive review of Boeing's brand-new fleet of 787 Dreamliners, after a string of scares struck the state-of-the-art passenger jet in a week.

The Federal Aviation Administration finally launched the probe after a crack appeared in a cockpit window during a domestic All Nippon Airways flight in Japan today.
The review is an embarrassing setback to the plane that was heralded as the future of aviation, after four separate malfunctions occurred this week alone, including a brake failure, a fuel leak and an on-board fire.

The FAA says the review will include the design, manufacture and assembly of the aircraft.

THE BOEING DREAMLINER 787: A HISTORY OF FAILURES AND DELAYS

December 2003 - Boeing announces that a new state-of-the-art plane would be assembled in its factory in Everett, Washington.
January 2005 - Boeing designates its new plane the 787, announcing that the high-tech jet will enter service in May 2008.
December 2006 - The first six 787s are revealed to be overweight.
September 5 2007 - Boeing announces a three-month delay, blaming a shortage of fasteners as well as incomplete software
October 11 2007 - Boeing announces delay of six months due to production problems, pushing first delivery back to December 2008.
January 16 2008 - Boeing announces a third three-month delay, citing insufficient progress on 'traveled work'.
April 9 2008 - Boeing officially announces a fourth delay, shifting the maiden flight to the fourth quarter of 2008, and delaying initial deliveries by around 15 months to the third quarter of 2009.
November 4, 2008 - The company announces a fifth delay due to incorrect fastener installation and the Boeing machinists strike, stating that the first test flight would not occur in the fourth quarter of 2008.
December 11 2008 - Boeing acknowledges a sixth delay of six-months with first delivery scheduled for early 2010.
June 2009 - Boeing stuns the industry by postponing the first flight indefinitely after engineers find structural flaws.
August 2010 - Another delay announced, citing engine delivery issues from Rolls Royce.
November 2010 - A test flight is forced into an emergency landing in Laredo, Texas, after crew notice smoke in the cabin.
October 11 2011 - First commercial flight of Boeing 787 Dreamliner from Narita, Japan, to Hong Kong on All Nippon Airways.
February 6 2012 - Boeing reports signs of 'delamination' occurring on a support structure in the Dreamliner's rear fuselage, launching an inspection.
July 11 2012 - A fire breaks out in the ground power unit beneath a Qatar Airways Boeing Dreamliner at the Farnborough Airshow.
July 30 2012 - Debris from a brand-new Dreamliner's engine sparks a fire at a South Carolina airport forcing emergency crews to close the Charleston International Airport for more than an hour.
September 15 2012 - NTSB requests the grounding of certain 787s due to GE engine failures.
December 4 2012 - United Airlines' brand-new Dreamliner, carrying 174 passengers and 10 crew, is forced to make an emergency landing in New Orleans due to a mechanical issue.
December 13 2012 - Qatar Airways grounds one of its Dreamliners after several similar faults caused electrical problems.
January 9 2013 - All Nippon Airlines is forced to cancel a domestic flight to Tokyo after a computer wrongly indicated a problem with the 787's brakes.
January 7 2013 - A Dreamliner catches fire after dropping off 183 passengers and crew in Boston when a battery in the jet's auxiliary power system overheated.
January 8 2013 - A fuel leak forces a Japan Airlines-operated 787 to cancel takeoff at Boston's Logan International Airport.
January 11 2013 - The Federal Aviation Administration launch a review after a crack appeares in a cockpit window during a domestic All Nippon Airways flight in Japan.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2260733/Aviation-regulators-demand-safety-review-Boeing-787-Dreamliners-series-mechanical-structural-

I can't believe you do not understand, Tom. It's a test and a trap. A trap to get hundreds of brown, yellow and black people up in the air never to come down alive, and a test for the gun-totin', bible punchin', born agin. redneck, macho yanks who don't even know what a passport looks like, to test their innate fear of science.
Total success... as is everything American. Yee-har.
 
Like dealing with an angry child.

Firefighters used infrared cameras to locate the fire in a battery pack in the belly of a Boeing 787 and extinguished the blaze within 20 minutes. However it has been revealed that if the battery fire had occurred during a transocean flight the aircraft may have been brought down.
 
Last edited:
Seems like regulation didn't help

Interesting thought. There are safety defects within air liners and your first thought is to remove regulatory processes that help prevent these defects - it seems any rational person would want to increase preventative measures, not decrease them.

Are you sure your political agenda doesn't trump your concern for the lives of others?
 
Interesting thought. There are safety defects within air liners and your first thought is to remove regulatory processes that help prevent these defects - it seems any rational person would want to increase preventative measures, not decrease them.

Are you sure your political agenda doesn't trump your concern for the lives of others?

Congratulations, you took an illogical premise and logically came up with an illogical conclusion. You should be so proud.

Where did I say we should remove regulatory processes? You threw out a random, snarky comment which really had nothing to do with the OP, so I responded in kind. It is a nowhere argument as to whether the defects would have been caught with a regulatory regime or without. I can point to hundreds of failure of the regulatory regime. Enron ring a bell?

You presume that businesses want to be in the business of investing hundreds of millions of dollars and then fucking it all up. That is more the speed of the federal gobblement in which you put so much of your faith.
 
Back
Top