DRASTIC OBAMA DROP



SM, I'm not going to bother arguing this idiocy with you. Suffice it to say that good and accurate likely voter models are accurate predictors of electoral outcomes while bad and inaccurate likely voter models are not accurate predictors of electoral outcomes. Rasmussen's polls did not accurately predict electoral outcomes in the 2010 election.
 
it still was not the insult christie made it out to be....she incorrectly analogized it to zappa's insult and its hypocritical for her to have a problem with your post, yet, say nothing and essentially defend zappa's.


I couldn't care less what she thinks of my post. She set herself up and I seized the opportunity.

If you think about it, it was actually a round-about way of defending the disparaging remark she was making about you.
 
SM, I'm not going to bother arguing this idiocy with you. Suffice it to say that good and accurate likely voter models are accurate predictors of electoral outcomes while bad and inaccurate likely voter models are not accurate predictors of electoral outcomes. Rasmussen's polls did not accurately predict electoral outcomes in the 2010 election.

I'm not arguing the accuracy of the polls, but the precision at showing the trend. In case you need a refresher on the two terms:

accuracy-vs-precision.png
 
I'm not arguing the accuracy of the polls, but the precision at showing the trend. In case you need a refresher on the two terms:

accuracy-vs-precision.png


The day Nigey DOESN'T argue with ANYBODY, will be the day they remove his voice box and amputate his finger and toes, but he will still try and peck out a reply with his nose.
 
I'm not arguing the accuracy of the polls, but the precision at showing the trend. In case you need a refresher on the two terms:

accuracy-vs-precision.png


The trend over the past year is relatively flat. Focusing on two weeks worth of data and looking for a trend is a pointless endeavor.
 
Give me a break, bonehead. I'm talking about one pollster skewing from the average by a greater number than the margin of error. I know your Obama hatred blinds you to facts but seriously, all those other pollsters aren't just ganging up to make Rasmussen look bad.
Sorry asshole....most of us expect polls of differing dates to show differing results....seems only you assholes find that odd....go figure.:fu:

Rasmussen is and remains one of the most respected polls no matter what the fuck you whine about.
 
All that matters is the votes of November 12', Obama is following the path of Reagan and Clinton did in the polls leading up to the reelection.
 
LongEYELand????????????? Somebody's got too much time on their hands again. Guess hubby #2 is on his way out....

:rofl:

Yes, well, it's pretty easy to be on the way out of that harridan's life when there never existed an actual in~ just sayin'

More is sure to develope with this story...and I am always right about this :D
 
Yes, well, it's pretty easy to be on the way out of that harridan's life when there never existed an actual in~ just sayin'

More is sure to develope with this story...and I am always right about this :D

Yeah, the hound dawg is rarely far away. It prides itself in being so stealth too.


A BA and awl!!!
 
I was fairly surprised to see this drastic drop. With all the squawking going on in Wisconsin and the Dems with their drawers in a twist screeching for a recall, who'duh thunk it...

Hold on peeps. Things are going to really start taking a turn for the worse with this Japan catastrophe.

These are very scary times.



http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...ministration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

It was at 47% yesterday, wasn't it? My guess: poll noise. Come back to me when a trend emerges.
 
He doesn't even dare attack me personally on this board, because he knows how badly I have embarrassed him in the past. :)

Oh puh-leeeeeeze...I don't dare?

Alright...how's this?

You are a ridiculous chickenshit little turd. If we ever met face to face you'd definitely shit yourself and run screaming for your mommy, ya pathetic little "buck-thirty-five" weighing joke of a man.

135?? Christ...one of my LEGS weighs 135...I could stomp you flat in less than 60 seconds.

Anyone else ever know anyone with "little man" syndrome? You know the type...135-140...5'7"...and a big fat mouth always getting them into trouble?

I had one for a buddy when I was a kid and his big mouth and lack of body mass always wound up being a deadly combination...for him.

That's what we get with DY...just another big mouth with "little guy" syndrome.
 
It's not some ill-defined "standards" that are the issue, but one of full disclosure. Rasmussen clearly indicates who's doing the approving, democrats or republicans or unaffiliated. He appears to be the only one doing a daily poll, therefore can show the most accurate trend.

Gallup has a daily poll and the last time they had him at 42% was in November. Right now they have him at 48%.

http://www.pollingreport.com/obama_job.htm#Gallup
 
i have never seen those posts....

and, while you're at it, yoiu seem like you don't approve of her allegedly insulting her husband, YET, you don't say anything to zappa and instead attack me, thus clearly indicating your approval of zappa insulting DY's wife while disapproving of someone else doing the same

open your eyes first

:rolleyes:

I know there's bad blood between Zap and the skank, and it's been ongoing for years and years... not only with Zap but with most of us AOLers. Why on earth would I criticize Zap for giving back to her what she's been spewing about the rest of us since day one?

You have NO clue... none whatsoever. Pull up and read the skank's posts, and then get back to me re: your weaselly comments about "never seeing those posts".

I'm 100% certain that your name will be found on any thread where she's shooting off her mouth about our families.
 
Back
Top