That wouldn't affect the trend, which clearly shows The Obama as tanking.
Nate Silver is a polictial hack...read
That wouldn't affect the trend, which clearly shows The Obama as tanking.
Nate Silver is a polictial hack...read
Oh, be fair. Christie's entire argument hinges on this one man's opinion...Nate Silver is a polictial hack...read
Which, according to Gallup, is the most accurate.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/143372/understanding-gallup-likely-voter-models.aspx
it still was not the insult christie made it out to be....she incorrectly analogized it to zappa's insult and its hypocritical for her to have a problem with your post, yet, say nothing and essentially defend zappa's.
SM, I'm not going to bother arguing this idiocy with you. Suffice it to say that good and accurate likely voter models are accurate predictors of electoral outcomes while bad and inaccurate likely voter models are not accurate predictors of electoral outcomes. Rasmussen's polls did not accurately predict electoral outcomes in the 2010 election.
I'm not arguing the accuracy of the polls, but the precision at showing the trend. In case you need a refresher on the two terms:
![]()
The day Nigey DOESN'T argue with ANYBODY, will be the day they remove his voice box and amputate his finger and toes, but he will still try and peck out a reply with his nose.
I'm not arguing the accuracy of the polls, but the precision at showing the trend. In case you need a refresher on the two terms:
![]()
Hacktacular hackalicious Lib. Just like Christie likes 'em.
Sorry asshole....most of us expect polls of differing dates to show differing results....seems only you assholes find that odd....go figure.Give me a break, bonehead. I'm talking about one pollster skewing from the average by a greater number than the margin of error. I know your Obama hatred blinds you to facts but seriously, all those other pollsters aren't just ganging up to make Rasmussen look bad.
Side note- there has been activity from L.I. -LOL- and it's a hoot-n-half![]()
LongEYELand????????????? Somebody's got too much time on their hands again. Guess hubby #2 is on his way out....
Yes, well, it's pretty easy to be on the way out of that harridan's life when there never existed an actual in~ just sayin'
More is sure to develope with this story...and I am always right about this![]()
I was fairly surprised to see this drastic drop. With all the squawking going on in Wisconsin and the Dems with their drawers in a twist screeching for a recall, who'duh thunk it...
Hold on peeps. Things are going to really start taking a turn for the worse with this Japan catastrophe.
These are very scary times.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...ministration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
He doesn't even dare attack me personally on this board, because he knows how badly I have embarrassed him in the past.![]()
It's not some ill-defined "standards" that are the issue, but one of full disclosure. Rasmussen clearly indicates who's doing the approving, democrats or republicans or unaffiliated. He appears to be the only one doing a daily poll, therefore can show the most accurate trend.
no surprise you would defend zappa insulting DY's wife....cowardly hack
i have never seen those posts....
and, while you're at it, yoiu seem like you don't approve of her allegedly insulting her husband, YET, you don't say anything to zappa and instead attack me, thus clearly indicating your approval of zappa insulting DY's wife while disapproving of someone else doing the same
open your eyes first
![]()