You sure do talk about dicks a lot. Not that there's anything wrong with it. Your alternate lifestyle is none of my business.
Yes. You come up in conversations way too much.
Dow plunges 665 points as stocks post worst week in 2 years
- Thread starter signalmankenneth
- Start date
Yes. You come up in conversations way too much.
Joe Capitalist
Racism is a disease
Sorry but I'm not interested in a relationship. I prefer women.
You're starting to scare me. Thus, you are the newest entry onto my IGNORE list.
Congrats.
Ones with hairy legs and adams apples maybe. And broke.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
you and Trump have something in common.......you both need to have lots of money so women would prefer you........unfortunately for you, lots of money is NOT something you have in common with Trump......
Joe Capitalist
Racism is a disease
The DOW is now down over 700 points and tanking fast. Investors are nervous that we have an unstable idiot in the White House.
I'm glad I took my profits off the table in December. I've got about $700k on the sidelines ready to get back in once it finds a bottom.
I knew this meltdown was coming. The market was way overpriced and we were overdue for a correction.
I love capitalism.
Русский агент;2203446 said:
Good point.
^Stupid moron thinks the economy is finite. Did the 84% steal the money you ignorant twat?
You really are the biggest vagina on the forum asshat.
Of course you did; you really are THAT fucking retarded. Nothing says ignoramus better than someone calling it the Bush recession. Dunce.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Dear idiot; it wasn't <3%, it was less than 2%. The stock market had peaked at 15973.17 before Obama took office. Measuring anything OTHER than that for his Presidency is moronic.
If we measure the market correctly, Obama's Presidency, marked by easy money from the Fed called Quantitative Easing, the market increased by 4,2041.44 points.
Trump has been in office barely a year and the market has increased by 4,671.66 points and is currently still up by 3,415 points with GDP at 2.3%. Average GDP during Obamunism; 1.66%
Summary; you're a gullible moron.
http://money.cnn.com/2018/01/26/news/economy/2017-gdp/index.html
Wrong again shit-for-brains; this did: You can thank the idiots in the Party of the Jackass
http://www.thetruthaboutmortgage.com/what-caused-the-mortgage-crisis/
Republicans did nothing but try to tear down and downplay and talk down Obama's awesome stock market gains as disconnected from
that office, so it's pretty funny to see you people doggedly attribute stock market gains to Trump.
In addition, you are cherry picking the optimal moment in time of the Dow prior to Obama as a metric to judge his performance.
That makes no sense. If we are going to run the fools errand of crediting or discrediting a Potus, (thereby treating it as a race), what we
measure is the distance covered. You MUST compare what he was handed to where it was when he handed it off. I believe this is
a stupid exercise anyway, but as long as we are doing it....do it right. If we are comparing Trump to Obama using the Stock market, we don't do it
by comparing Obama to the highest point under Bush. That's arbitrary. We compare it to Trump's total gain, not some conveniently selected moment in time.
Basically what we are doing is comparing legs of a relay race. If in some moment in time Bush was running his leg like Hussein Boldt, that is irrelevant
if Bush stumbled at the handoff and was going 2 MPH.
Idiot.
This is nothing more than a complete lie. No one downplayed the stock market regardless of who is in charge. The argument was that it was being propped up by a farcical Quantitative Easing policy that spent us into deeper debt. You cannot print money and expect an economy to grow....which explains the anemic growth during Obamunism and the fact that most jobs being created were low wage part time work.
No I was not. If the market tanks, you don't count the low point as the growth point; you count where the market was at it's peak. You see dimwitted wonderboy, you have to make up for what was already lost.
Of course it would not make sense to you, you're clueless when it comes to economics and finance.
Yet, that is exactly what this thread is trying to do with Trump. Good lord, how fucking dense are you?
Of course idiots and fools would like to do this; but it is moronic to make such an argument. If the market peaked at 15973.17, you don't start the credit until you have regained all that was lost.
Then chat with the thread author; I agree that it is the pinnacle of stupidity to whine about the stock market one year into a Presidency and then pretend that Presidents can make markets move through nothing other than their rhetoric.
Wrong; if the market was at 15973.17, regardless of who was in charge, you don't pretend that you don't have to reach that level before the real accounting begins again. THAT is moronic.
Wrong; what I am doing is using sound judgement and logic while you rant ignorant about the true financial ramifications and economics of it.
Yes, you are.
Because in idiot land, one pretends that the stock market never achieved what it had under the previous administration and should pretend that all the gains were actual gains. That's what you morons on the left do a lot of, pretending. You even pretend to be winning when in reality you have been doing nothing but losing.