Double Standard...

Probably the same reason righties make excuses for Trump & O'Reilly's treatment of women, but Clinton's affairs were the height of moral turpitude.
 
Naw, he didn't lose it. He just didn't have a fucking clue where they were. At least the "Armada" did.

You're so fucking one dimensional. If he is told by the higher ups where the ship is, is he supposed to believe different? Or was this brinkmanship?

The fallout has triggered questions about whether the Navy failed to properly explain the Carl Vinson’s travel timeline to the White House and then both parties decided to stay mum, or whether some leaders kept the American public in the dark as part of an information warfare campaign against Pyongyang.

“Misinformation can be a critical part of 4D national security — defense, diplomacy, democracy and development — but the margin of error is razor thin when dealing with nations possessing nuclear weapons,” said Shawn VanDiver, a former sailor who now helms the San Diego chapter of the Truman Project, a think tank based in Washington, D.C.

http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/military/sd-me-vinson-korea-20170418-story.html

Let's say he is not playing 4D national security, or as Grind says, 4D chess, Trump tells his military people to get the ship to South Korean waters and they say, okay, yes sir. Then they screw that up, how is Trump supposed to know? You must think he has a magic globe that can tell him where anything is in the world.

I will say this though, it disturbed me greatly. Because what if this was an actual wartime command. The buck should stop with Trump, however, what can he do when he orders the military to move a ship and they screw up the communication? Serious question, because I don't recall this ever happening before.
 
Here is the reality.

The fake news is that it was "lost". It was never lost. There appears to be miscommunication between the WH and the Pentagon over the order to change course. They are now heading to SK waters.

Yes, this an embarrassment for the WH, but the "armada" was never lost.
 
You still bummed because you never explained why you lied about posters here "defending" terrorism?

A really despicable lie, btw. Just horrible.

I did. You're just projecting anger because you never explained why you lied that you changed back to Hillary a couple of days before the election or why you lied I always defend Trump when I showed you plenty of posts where I do.

You're nothing but hack projector. A minuscule germ on the internet who enjoys lying about people, but to hide his true nature, calls other liars.

If you had any honesty in you, you would have admitted you lied about Hillary and lied that I always defend Trump. But you don't. Literally, last week you claimed in a thread, where I criticized Trump, that I was defending him. You're that pathological. It was hilarious.
 
I did. You're just projecting anger because you never explained why you lied that you changed back to Hillary a couple of days before the election or why you lied I always defend Trump when I showed you plenty of posts where I do.

You're nothing but hack projector. A minuscule germ on the internet who enjoys lying about people, but to hide his true nature, calls other liars.

If you had any honesty in you, you would have admitted you lied about Hillary and lied that I always defend Trump. But you don't. Literally, last week you claimed in a thread, where I criticized Trump, that I was defending him. You're that pathological. It was hilarious.

You never explained it. I bumped the thread again today, and you ignored it.

If you explained it - what was your explanation? You accused posters here of defending terrorist acts. How did you "explain" that?

Let's have it.

You won't respond, because you have nothing. That is obvious. It was a despicable lie, and now you think you can just run away from it.
 
And lefties defended it, you probably did too, because you always defend your precious party.

I mean, the bolded is a lie on the scale of what you always accuse me of - but it's pretty minor stuff. I don't even care when you lie like this about me.

But accusing others of "defending" terrorism? That's low, man. Awful.
 
I mean, the bolded is a lie on the scale of what you always accuse me of - but it's pretty minor stuff. I don't even care when you lie like this about me.

But accusing others of "defending" terrorism? That's low, man. Awful.

Thank you for proving my point. I made that statement solely to show what a liar YOU are.

Of course you don't always defend the dems. In fact, when I first joined I made a comment to that effect when someone accused you of the same. I defended you. But then after the election you lost it and just started lying left and right.

Glad you can finally understand why you're a liar.
 
You never explained it. I bumped the thread again today, and you ignored it.

If you explained it - what was your explanation? You accused posters here of defending terrorist acts. How did you "explain" that?

Let's have it.

You won't respond, because you have nothing. That is obvious. It was a despicable lie, and now you think you can just run away from it.

I did, however you won't respond to why you lied about your Hillary prediction or how I always defend Trump.

GFY liar.
 
I did, however you won't respond to why you lied about your Hillary prediction or how I always defend Trump.

GFY liar.

No - you did not. That in itself is a lie.

And you know it, which is why you're getting agitated. Just apologize to those posters, and we're cool.
 
You never explained it. I bumped the thread again today, and you ignored it.

If you explained it - what was your explanation? You accused posters here of defending terrorist acts. How did you "explain" that?

Let's have it.

You won't respond, because you have nothing. That is obvious. It was a despicable lie, and now you think you can just run away from it.

This is like the second or third time you claim to bump a thread and expect me to know which thread you bumped.

You're a narcissist like Trump.

I don't read every new thread or every bumped thread. Either link the thread or shut up. I told you that last time and of course you ignore it, because you can just blithely claim you bumped "some" thread.

You can't cite a single lie, let alone that I'm a chronic liar. You're pathological Thingy. That is a true statement.
 
Maybe because Obama was black?
5160320.jpg

Maybe that's why you continue to kiss his ass.
 
Back
Top