Don't Try To Burglarize A House Occupied By Marines

WTF is going on today? Grind is billy, Volt is 3-D, Watermark; well who the hell knows about watermark anyhow.
 
Alexander Hamilton said:
Wow, you're so tough, webbway! I bet your dick must be huge! You have really impressed me, like all who sit around ceaselessly and look newsfeeds for stories of someone getting killed to fap to.
Click to expand...

You another one of those RumpRangers? You sound very gay talking about my dick.

LOL

Or are you another one of those liberals that thinks we should all get along???
 
Occupant said:
Is this a gay thing they have going on?
Click to expand...

There's a lot of homoerotic undertones on this board. Sometimes it really bursts right out into the open, like when Superfreak and Mott the Hoople get into it. I think it's kinda hot. Interestingly, there are no undertones between any of the women here. Well, not since Tiana stopped posting anyway.
 
Grind said:
Plenty of ideas. Tax incentives for businesses that priority hire recent (within 18 months) prior felons, reduction of what constitutes a felony charge, remove the federal prohibition of student financial aid for recreational drug users. That makes 5 now.
Click to expand...

What you fail to take into considreration is that it's the public who really decides what kind of "rehabilitation" criminals receive.
Somewhere it's been referred to as the Pendulum Affect.
It seems to swing from trying everything in the world to change them, to doing nothing.
When times are good, the public is more receptive to offering programs that can try to help; but when times are bad, the public doesn't want to pay more taxes and see their money go to helping criminals.
Then you have to take into account that to help someone, they must want to be helped.

There are areas that can be focused on, immediately; but the drug laws are not going to change overnight, so using that as a "point of order" isn't going to affect anything.

The really funny part of the "war on drugs" is what happened to all the pot heads of the 60's and 70's who SWORE to work towards making changes and now that they're in the majority of the voting population, the penalties are still here.
Why didn't they elect Politicians who would support the elimination of those laws; because if they would elect enough of them, they could force the changes in these laws.

Since the drug laws aren't going to change, at this time, how do you propose getting the public to fund the rehabilition programs, when so many of them are just trying to survive; because this has been debated and discussed many more times then just this time?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
What you fail to take into considreration is that it's the public who really decides what kind of "rehabilitation" criminals receive.
Somewhere it's been referred to as the Pendulum Affect.
It seems to swing from trying everything in the world to change them, to doing nothing.
When times are good, the public is more receptive to offering programs that can try to help; but when times are bad, the public doesn't want to pay more taxes and see their money go to helping criminals.
Then you have to take into account that to help someone, they must want to be helped.

There are areas that can be focused on, immediately; but the drug laws are not going to change overnight, so using that as a "point of order" isn't going to affect anything.

The really funny part of the "war on drugs" is what happened to all the pot heads of the 60's and 70's who SWORE to work towards making changes and now that they're in the majority of the voting population, the penalties are still here.
Why didn't they elect Politicians who would support the elimination of those laws; because if they would elect enough of them, they could force the changes in these laws.

Since the drug laws aren't going to change, at this time, how do you propose getting the public to fund the rehabilition programs, when so many of them are just trying to survive; because this has been debated and discussed many more times then just this time?
Click to expand...

.
Rune said:
We all know your job is dependent on the continuation of the phony drug war, so your opinion is both tainted and meaningless.
Click to expand...
 
Grind said:
Making life harder for criminals to reenter the world isn't exactly the best way to lower crime or prevent repeat offenses.
Click to expand...

exactly...it took california decades to realize this after realizing our recidivism rate was atrocious and it actually cost tax payers more money than rehabilitating inmates.
 
Grind said:
How many is he likely to commit when he gets out and has no legal source of income?
Click to expand...
Do you know what the recidivism rate is among burglaries? Do you know how many are caught?(it's less than 30%) Most of these guys then transition into violent crimes and then somebody gets hurt/killed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top