Donald Trump “Jokes” About Kicking Non-Christians Out of His Rally
- Thread starter Timshel
- Start date
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
It's just sad to me how you defend that.
You're no better than any of the war apologists on the right. Same excuses, same lack of accountability. You're just as steeped in the partisan koolaid.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
That's not a lie, desh. That's based on logic, reasoned out from past behavior & patterns in her history.
If THAT is a lie, that it is DEFINITELY a lie when you say I hate Hillary. So, you are a liar. By your own standard. And quite pathological about it, I might add.
evince
Truthmatters
she saw what it was like to be president and have politics used to stop what NEEDED to be done (wag the dog)
her constituients wanted to go in
she was given lies
Imagine the things Bush and team said to her to get her on board
we were wrong to question bill and are so sorry we did
you assume the worst of her decision for what reason
her constituients wanted to go in
she was given lies
Imagine the things Bush and team said to her to get her on board
we were wrong to question bill and are so sorry we did
you assume the worst of her decision for what reason
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
obviously it was a lie.....she has no mind to read......
Some wish him to be so, so they pretend that he is......... It works for them....... They have many concerns but Jesus was a republican, was for small gubment & guns just like the party today.......
He got the nomination so he must be the choice, God's choice, & God don't make mistakes........ These corn & pig farmers get tickled pink by his mere presence & the fact that their modern day Pharisees & Sadducees' venerate him is all the more reason for showering him w/ their adoration...........
Good point, Ivanka and her husband, his closest advisors!
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
That explains why he pats his daughter down, I guess. He's making sure she's not wearing magic Mormon underwear.
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
Here we see a concerned dad making sure his daughter hasn't started wearing anything non-Christian:
Lol so now the AUMF against Iraq was not a vote for the Iraq war, your source is a fucking joke let's start with myth 1, there is no section 3b of the 1973 War Powers Act ans section 3 deals exclusively with consultation:
CONSULTATION
SEC. 3. The President in every possible instance shall consult with Congress before introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situation where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and after every such introduction shall consult regularly with the Congress until United States Armed Forces are no longer engaged in hostilities or have been removed from such situations.
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/warpower.asp
Last edited:
Isn't Trump buddies with that dude that Bill Clinton knows? The dude with the underage sex slaves..
http://www.dailywire.com/news/5749/...ent-jeffrey-epsteins-sex-amanda-prestigiacomo
http://www.dailywire.com/news/5749/...ent-jeffrey-epsteins-sex-amanda-prestigiacomo
LOL it looks like she's pushing him away. Nooo Daddy, NoooooHere we see a concerned dad making sure his daughter hasn't started wearing anything non-Christian:
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
Yep. As is Prince Andrew.
What does the company you keep say about the way you live your own moral compass? Among the things you have in common with your friends and colleagues, should the world assume that means the worst acts of one of you? It’s a question a lot of people are asking lately about both Prince Andrew and Donald Trump.
Their former associate Jeffrey E. Epstein, a billionaire businessman, is a convicted sex offender. The record on Epstein’s behavior is enough to make your skin crawl.
But now that the Prince has been accused of sexual misconduct – and old pal Donald Trump’s history’s of friendship with him has been brought up in the press – the line between guilt and mere guilt by association is up for very public examination.
Beginning in 2008, Epstein served thirteen months for soliciting prostitution, following a lengthy Florida investigation involving allegations of “aggravated assault” of underage girls.
The Palm Beach police department’s 2006 affidavit included “sworn taped statements” from “five victims and seventeen witnesses” regarding unlawful sexual activity with girls, including one as young as fourteen, who were reportedly brought in to give him massages.
Since then, Epstein has reached out-of-court settlements with a number of the alleged victims.
Jane Doe 3 claims that she was procured for Epstein by the late mogul Robert Maxwell’s daughter Ghislaine beginning when she was fifteen – and that she was used as a “sex slave” and lent out “for sex to politically connected and financially powerful people.”
A motion filed in Florida goes on to say that “One such powerful individual Epstein forced Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with was a member of the British royal family, Prince Andrew (aka Duke of York).” The documents say that Epstein ordered the now 30 year-old woman to “give the prince whatever he demanded” and “report back on the details.”
Buckingham Palace, which rarely comments on allegations against the royal family, has strenuously denied the claim, saying, “This relates to longstanding and ongoing civil proceedings in the United States, to which the Duke of York is not a party. As such we would not comment on the detail. However, for the avoidance of doubt, any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue.”
In 2011, Andrew resigned as “an ambassador for British businesses abroad” after his association with Epstein became known. That same year, Vanity Fair reported that “According to a sworn deposition by Juan Alessi, a former employee at Epstein’s Palm Beach estate, Andrew attended naked pool parties and was treated to massages by a harem of adolescent girls.”
http://www.salon.com/2015/01/05/he_likes_beautiful_women_as_much_as_i_do_inside_the_latest_stormcloud_of_sex_abuse_allegations/