No you are wrong and stupid as it is the entire difference.
You can walk out of a store with some of their sale items in your cart unpaid for and when confronted, that you did not pay for them and thus do not own them, give them back, and they can choose to not have you charged.
You can do the same and when confronted refuse to give them back, lie to them that you even have them and try to block them until they forcibly take them back and they can choose to then have you chargted.
Thread after thread you keep making this stupid asinine argument, because you are dumb, that these situations must be treated the same due to the 'taking of the stuff' when in reality, when initial intent cannot be proven in either case, it is the willful defiance and obstruction that will get you charged.
We CANNOT prove the intent of the person who took the 'stuff' which often leads to them being given the benefit of the doubt. We can PROVE the intent to obstruct and the attempt to keep stolen stuff, which also speaks to the original theft.
That is the defining difference. THAT is why Trump needs to be charged and Pence does not.
