Donald Duck troll campaign ordered by HRClinton

anatta

100% recycled karma
Democratic operative caught on camera: Hillary PERSONALLY ordered 'Donald Duck' troll campaign that broke the law by coordinating with tax-exempt pressure group

*Latest video from Project Veritas Action establishes what appears to be illegal coordination between Hillary For America and a liberal nonprofit
* Robert Creamer says on hidden camera that Hillary Clinton personally ordered the use of a 'Donald Duck' costume to troll Donald Trump
*The project was assigned to the Democracy Partners consultancy, which had the tax-exempt Americans United for Change carry it out
*Since the campaign coordinated the project with the operatives, the staff time and expenses involved would be an illegal campaign contribution
*Creamer is a convicted felon who was forced out of Democracy Partners after the last video sting showed him organizing a voter fraud scheme
*Clinton's campaign manager declared Sunday that he and his underlings never had contact with Hillary For America

illary Clinton personally ordered a consultant to use a nonprofit group to troll the Trump campaign with a 'Donald Duck' mascot, according to the Democratic operatives who say they arranged it with a nonprofit organization.

The action, if true, would be a black-letter violation of federal election law, which prohibits presidential campaigns from coordinating activities with outside groups that can collect unlimited 'dark money' from contributors – and don't pay taxes on what they collect.

The conservative group Project Veritas Action released video footage on Monday showing Robert Creamer, a convicted felon who was forced out of his executive role at the liberal consultancy Democracy Partners, saying Clinton chose the duck stunt.

'In the end, it was the candidate, Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States, who wanted ducks on the ground. So by God we would get ducks on the ground,' Creamer says in the video.

39AC7D1D00000578-3867558-image-m-18_1477328690443.jpg

The footage shows felon Robert Creamer, who has now been forced out of campaigning, boasting that Hillary Clinton was behind an attack on Trump

he far-left nonprofit Americans United for Change was tasked with carrying out the work.

AUFC is tax-exempt under Section 501(c)(4) of the federal tax code, allowing it to conduct limited amounts of electioneering as long as it doesn't directly advocate voting for or against candidates.

It also doesn't have to publicly identify its donors, distinguishing it from super PACs which must disclose their income sources but can electioneer more aggressively.

The Federal Election Commission prohibits campaigns from working with outside groups where a tangible dollar amount is tied to back-and-forth communications.

Money spent to buy the duck costume, pay staff to wear it, and publicize each campaign stunt would be considered an illegal campaign contribution to Hillary For America.

The Clinton campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

39AAB1D000000578-3867558-Hillary_Clinton_personally_asked_for_the_duck_to_be_deployed_ins-a-5_1477327866754.jpg


AUFC's duck costume has been a staple in front of Trump Tower and at the Republican presidential nominee's campaign events in recent months.

Project Veritas Action is the same group that upended the campaign environment this week with video showing Creamer and a subcontractor describing their efforts to 'birddog' Trump events by sending activists into his rallies with instructions to start physical fights.

They were also caught on camera describing a scheme to bus Americans across state lines to commit voter fraud.

James O'Keefe the Project Veritas Action founder, has become a major conservative player in this year's battle of October surprises. Trump's campaign brought him to last week's final presidential debate in Las Vegas, and the candidate himself referenced his videos on stage.

'If it looks like a duck, if it walks like a duck, and if it sounds like a duck ... then it's probably a duck,' he said in Monday's video. 'They broke the law.'

Creamer, whose wife is Illinois Democratic congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, has visited the Obama White House 342 times, according to official records. He met with the president at least once in the Oval Office, despite his criminal conviction for bank fraud.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...w-coordinating-tax-exempt-pressure-group.html
 
When the undercover interviewer says, 'So it's her. Wow,' Creamer lets the cat out of the bag and adds: 'Don't repeat that to anybody.'

'She really wanted this duck figure doing this stuff,' he says.


Creamer says the original plan was to have an Uncle Sam-costumed man instead of the duck, baiting Trump to release his personal income tax returns.

That costume would have been far easier to buy and license, since the Walt Disney Company owns the rights to the Donald Duck character.

Hillary For America Deputy Communications Director Christina Reynolds called Creamer personally to relay the message from the Democratic presidential nominee, he declares on tape.

'Christina Reynolds calls,' he says, 'saying, "I have good news and bad news. The good news is the candidate would like to have a mascot following around ... Trump. But the bad news is she wants it to be Donald Duck."

'My answer is, "Christine, if the future president wants ducks, we will put ducks on the ground,' he boasts.
 
Democratic operative caught on camera: Hillary PERSONALLY ordered 'Donald Duck' troll campaign that broke the law by coordinating with tax-exempt pressure group

*Latest video from Project Veritas Action establishes what appears to be illegal coordination between Hillary For America and a liberal nonprofit
* Robert Creamer says on hidden camera that Hillary Clinton personally ordered the use of a 'Donald Duck' costume to troll Donald Trump
*The project was assigned to the Democracy Partners consultancy, which had the tax-exempt Americans United for Change carry it out
*Since the campaign coordinated the project with the operatives, the staff time and expenses involved would be an illegal campaign contribution
*Creamer is a convicted felon who was forced out of Democracy Partners after the last video sting showed him organizing a voter fraud scheme
*Clinton's campaign manager declared Sunday that he and his underlings never had contact with Hillary For America

illary Clinton personally ordered a consultant to use a nonprofit group to troll the Trump campaign with a 'Donald Duck' mascot, according to the Democratic operatives who say they arranged it with a nonprofit organization.

The action, if true, would be a black-letter violation of federal election law, which prohibits presidential campaigns from coordinating activities with outside groups that can collect unlimited 'dark money' from contributors – and don't pay taxes on what they collect.

The conservative group Project Veritas Action released video footage on Monday showing Robert Creamer, a convicted felon who was forced out of his executive role at the liberal consultancy Democracy Partners, saying Clinton chose the duck stunt.

'In the end, it was the candidate, Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States, who wanted ducks on the ground. So by God we would get ducks on the ground,' Creamer says in the video.

39AC7D1D00000578-3867558-image-m-18_1477328690443.jpg

The footage shows felon Robert Creamer, who has now been forced out of campaigning, boasting that Hillary Clinton was behind an attack on Trump

he far-left nonprofit Americans United for Change was tasked with carrying out the work.

AUFC is tax-exempt under Section 501(c)(4) of the federal tax code, allowing it to conduct limited amounts of electioneering as long as it doesn't directly advocate voting for or against candidates.

It also doesn't have to publicly identify its donors, distinguishing it from super PACs which must disclose their income sources but can electioneer more aggressively.

The Federal Election Commission prohibits campaigns from working with outside groups where a tangible dollar amount is tied to back-and-forth communications.

Money spent to buy the duck costume, pay staff to wear it, and publicize each campaign stunt would be considered an illegal campaign contribution to Hillary For America.

The Clinton campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

39AAB1D000000578-3867558-Hillary_Clinton_personally_asked_for_the_duck_to_be_deployed_ins-a-5_1477327866754.jpg


AUFC's duck costume has been a staple in front of Trump Tower and at the Republican presidential nominee's campaign events in recent months.

Project Veritas Action is the same group that upended the campaign environment this week with video showing Creamer and a subcontractor describing their efforts to 'birddog' Trump events by sending activists into his rallies with instructions to start physical fights.

They were also caught on camera describing a scheme to bus Americans across state lines to commit voter fraud.

James O'Keefe the Project Veritas Action founder, has become a major conservative player in this year's battle of October surprises. Trump's campaign brought him to last week's final presidential debate in Las Vegas, and the candidate himself referenced his videos on stage.



Creamer, whose wife is Illinois Democratic congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, has visited the Obama White House 342 times, according to official records. He met with the president at least once in the Oval Office, despite his criminal conviction for bank fraud.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...w-coordinating-tax-exempt-pressure-group.html

Boohoo.
 
What do you think the odds are ABC, CBS etc report it

The election is rigged
virtually none. this is the actual candidate Clinton calling for trolling and a election violation.
can you imagine if Trump were behind something like this??? The coverage would be non-stop.
 
Did she violate Disney's copyright?

Don't know about that but IT IS AN ELECTION CRIME....plain and simple

Her coordinating with this 'outside' group to hassle Trump, his rallies, and his supporters....IS A CRIME

does it matter...no....we'd have to be as deaf, dumb and as stupid as her supporters to not see that she is above the laws that we have to obey.
 
Last edited:
Don't know about that but IT IS AN ELECTION CRIME....plain and simple

Her coordinating with this 'outside' group to hassle Trump, his rallies, and his supporters....IS A CRIME

does it matter...no....we'd have to be as deaf, dumb and as stupid as her supporters to not see that she is above the laws that we have to obey.

Is it? What statute was violated?
 
Hillary Clinton personally ordered a consultant to use a nonprofit group to troll the Trump campaign with a 'Donald Duck' mascot, according to the Democratic operatives who say they arranged it with a nonprofit organization.

The action, if true, would be a black-letter violation of federal election law, which prohibits presidential campaigns from coordinating activities with outside groups that can collect unlimited 'dark money' from contributors – and don't pay taxes on what they collect.
 
Hillary Clinton personally ordered a consultant to use a nonprofit group to troll the Trump campaign with a 'Donald Duck' mascot, according to the Democratic operatives who say they arranged it with a nonprofit organization.

The action, if true, would be a black-letter violation of federal election law, which prohibits presidential campaigns from coordinating activities with outside groups that can collect unlimited 'dark money' from contributors – and don't pay taxes on what they collect.

Sounds like the Mormon Church activities against California's Prop 8.
 
It's time for violent armed revolution against the Media Academic Govermental Global-Corporatist Complex, watch your back faggot we're coming for all of you and you'll be hanging from the light posts by 2017.

You're mumbling. Probably all my cum in your mouth.
 
Hillary Clinton personally ordered a consultant to use a nonprofit group to troll the Trump campaign with a 'Donald Duck' mascot, according to the Democratic operatives who say they arranged it with a nonprofit organization.

The action, if true, would be a black-letter violation of federal election law, which prohibits presidential campaigns from coordinating activities with outside groups that can collect unlimited 'dark money' from contributors – and don't pay taxes on what they collect.

501c4's can't advocate voting for one candidate or another. I don't see the duck doing that, do you?
 
They also can't coordinate with the campaign, we have indisputable evidence that they did coordinate so chalk one more felony up for Clinton.

Write a letter to someone who gives a shit. I'm sure they'll give your concerns all the consideration they deserve.

Here's the bottom line, shitweasel. You and your asswipe candidate are at the end of the line. At the end of your rope. And, desperately, you're grasping st anything you can. But it's too late. You bet on the wrong horse. Tough shit. Take your lumps and let it go.
 
Back
Top