DOJ reportedly 'irritated' by Manhattan DA's decision to indict Trump

While indicting Trump is a piss poor substitute for taking him and his 74,000,000 trumpanzees out permanently,

it's still something, at least.
 
Pointing out your madeup bullshit =/= reading or comprehension trouble.

Trouble separating your madeup bullshit from reality?

Why am I not surprised?

Justice Department officials are said to be annoyed by the Manhattan District Attorney's decision to indict Trump, as they believe it is a weak case which could undermine more serious legal probes Trump is facing.
DoJ upset because they wanted to be the first ones to put Trump in jail since they have more evidence of his crimes.

Cite the differences between the two statements above.
 
It is not a tough case. They will have Stormy, Cohen, McDiougal, Wesselberg and Pecker providing testimony. They were all directly involved in Trump-directed crimes. I am sure they have others on board. Cohen and Weisselberg served time for following Trump's orders. Pecker got a deal, testimony for no jail time.
The real complaint is that it has the weakest penalties. Bragg is going for felonies, 34 of them. That is a little tougher.
 
Justice Department officials are said to be annoyed by the Manhattan District Attorney's decision to indict Trump, as they believe it is a weak case which could undermine more serious legal probes Trump is facing.
DoJ upset because they wanted to be the first ones to put Trump in jail since they have more evidence of his crimes.

Cite the differences between the two statements above.

More HORSESHIT. Not what they are quoted as saying in the OP link. They tjhink the case is pathetic, and they are right.
 
It is not a tough case. They will have Stormy, Cohen, McDiougal, Wesselberg and Pecker providing testimony. They were all directly involved in Trump-directed crimes. I am sure they have others on board. Cohen and Weisselberg served time for following Trump's orders. Pecker got a deal, testimony for no jail time.
The real complaint is that it has the weakest penalties. Bragg is going for felonies, 34 of them. That is a little tougher.

Still no crime...NO UNDERLYING FELONY to "tie to" minor bookkeeping errors.
 
They clearly have cause to be concerned...even FELLOW WOKEISTS in the DOJ realize that Soros-funded Bragg is an imbecile.



DOJ reportedly 'irritated' by Manhattan DA's decision to indict Trump


Justice Department officials are said to be annoyed by the Manhattan District Attorney's decision to indict Trump, as they believe it is a weak case which could undermine more serious legal probes Trump is facing. Alvin Bragg's intention to criminally charge the former president for his payment of hush money to [adult entertainment] star Stormy Daniels was revealed on Thursday – sparking consternation and anger in Mar-a-Lago, and, according to The New York Times, in Washington DC. The paper reported that 'senior officials' at the Justice Department had concerns about the strength of Bragg's case.

The case has not been made public yet, but is believed to contain at least 30 counts related to the payment to Daniels shortly before the 2016 election. Justice Department officials reportedly consider Bragg's case a weak one.





https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p&cvid=a0cae18f8e6144c2afde1aa761d027e7&ei=34




bahaha-lmao.gif

Even rom com biy thinks it's bullshit and he voted to impeach trump

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-new-york-indictment-alvin-bragg/11601878002/
 
They clearly have cause to be concerned...even FELLOW WOKEISTS in the DOJ realize that Soros-funded Bragg is an imbecile.



DOJ reportedly 'irritated' by Manhattan DA's decision to indict Trump


Justice Department officials are said to be annoyed by the Manhattan District Attorney's decision to indict Trump, as they believe it is a weak case which could undermine more serious legal probes Trump is facing. Alvin Bragg's intention to criminally charge the former president for his payment of hush money to [adult entertainment] star Stormy Daniels was revealed on Thursday – sparking consternation and anger in Mar-a-Lago, and, according to The New York Times, in Washington DC. The paper reported that 'senior officials' at the Justice Department had concerns about the strength of Bragg's case.

The case has not been made public yet, but is believed to contain at least 30 counts related to the payment to Daniels shortly before the 2016 election. Justice Department officials reportedly consider Bragg's case a weak one.





https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p&cvid=a0cae18f8e6144c2afde1aa761d027e7&ei=34

]

So, what’s your point
 
More HORSESHIT. Not what they are quoted as saying in the OP link. They tjhink the case is pathetic, and they are right.

Are you claiming this is not in the OP?
Justice Department officials are said to be annoyed by the Manhattan District Attorney's decision to indict Trump, as they believe it is a weak case which could undermine more serious legal probes Trump is facing.

How is it different in substance from this?
DoJ upset because they wanted to be the first ones to put Trump in jail since they have more evidence of his crimes.
 
Still no crime...NO UNDERLYING FELONY to "tie to" minor bookkeeping errors.

I am sure trump will have his chance in court to claim his hush money payoff was just a "bookkeeping error", but it does seem to be planned. I doubt anyone will believe that defense.
 
Back
Top