DOJ Finds Biden is too Mentally Impaired to be Charged

[archives]

Biden was never going to get indicted by Garland and everyone knew it. Biden committed crime for sure but he got away with it.

Wrong, Garland did not have to release Hur’s report, could have released the conclusion but no the actual report, even better, he could have gotten out in front of it and as Barr did often, portray it as something different prior to releasing it, you are dead wrong

Then Pence would have had to be indicted for the same since his and Biden’s actions were almost identical

 

[ExpressLane]

He said that Biden did not deliberately conceal said documents, attempt to hide them, nor fight to keep them, the same conclusions the similar investigation into Pence arrived at, his reluctance to file charges was such and the fact Biden would portray himself as a sympathetic elderly man to any jury

STOP LYING Hur has documents that Biden stole out of a SCIF and KEPT for DECADES. "Willful retention of classified documents.

Biden's personal attorney said on January 21 that the Justice Department discovered six items containing classification markings during a consensual search of his home the previous day, some of which dated to his tenure in the Senate; investigators also seized some of Biden's handwritten notes from his vice presidency.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_B...torney said on,notes from his vice presidency.

So Biden intentionally stole Classified Documents from a SCIF then knowingly kept them for decades.

 

[ExpressLane]

Wrong, Garland did not have to release Hur’s report, could have released the conclusion but no the actual report, even better, he could have gotten out in front of it and as Barr did often, portray it as something different prior to releasing it, you are dead wrong

Then Pence would have had to be indicted for the same since his and Biden’s actions were almost identical

The public would have never accepted that. Barr released the full Muller report.

 

[TOP]

STOP LYING Hur has documents that Biden stole out of a SCIF and KEPT for DECADES. "Willful retention of classified documents.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_B...torney said on,notes from his vice presidency.

So Biden intentionally stole Classified Documents from a SCIF then knowingly kept them for decades.

It stated that clearly in the report... Joe can't remember anything that he did or anything that he took or anything that he does... I wonder if he ever cleaned the garage out?

 

[ExpressLane]

It stated that clearly in the report... Joe can't remember anything that he did or anything that he took or anything that he does... I wonder if he ever cleaned the garage out?

Biden said all the documents were in locked filing cabinets

Anchovies thinks he can lie about what is clearly written in the report.

 

[archives]

STOP LYING Hur has documents that Biden stole out of a SCIF and KEPT for DECADES. "Willful retention of classified documents.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_B...torney said on,notes from his vice presidency.

So Biden intentionally stole Classified Documents from a SCIF then knowingly kept them for decades.

“Taking them with him” is not stealing them, as was noted, as many had done before, he left with them to help him write his memoirs, the exact same thing the SP of Pence noted he had done, as had Bush and Obama

To deny the difference between Biden and Trump with the documents is either just an ignorance of the facts or refusal to accept the facts

 

[ExpressLane]

“Taking them with him” is not stealing them, as was noted, as many had done before, he left with them to help him write his memoirs, the exact same thing the SP of Pence noted he had done, as had Bush and Obama

To deny the difference between Biden and Trump with the documents is either just an ignorance of the facts or refusal to accept the facts

BIDEN HAD NO LEGAL RIGHT TO REMOVE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS FROM A SCIF AND TO KEEP THEM FOR DECADES MORON.

 

[archives]

The public would have never accepted that. Barr released the full Muller report.

Why? All SP reports are not released to the public, never have been, and other than Jimmy Jordan calling for his thousandth investigation, any repercussions wouldn’t have been felt prior to the election. Besides, Garland could have edited out the editorial sections of the report, the AG does get final review, nit he didn’t

And yes Barr did release the Musller repor, with redactions, however, as no AG had ever done before, he called a press conference beforehand and purposely framed the report to be interpreted the he wanted, or should I say, Trump demanded. He didn’t just deliver the report and let the public come to their own conclusions

Got anything else?

 

[archives]

BIDEN HAD NO LEGAL RIGHT TO REMOVE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS FROM A SCIF AND TO KEEP THEM FOR DECADES MORON.

NOR DID PENCE, BUSH,OBAMA, OR COUNTLESS BEFORE THEM, DIFFERENCE IS NONE OF THEM LIED ABOUT HAVING THEM, TRIED TO HIDE THEM, AND FOUGHT TO KEEP THEM.

WANT TO GO TO BIGGER SIZE NOW, ADD MORE USELESS PERSONAL ATTACKS, OR MAYBE TRY TO DEFEND WHAT YOU SAY.

 

[Dachshund]

Biden is the first sitting president in history to be declared legally incompetent to stand trial.

If he's not competent to be prosecuted, how can he be competent to sign laws and Executive Orders?
Credit to Lionfish

What the DOJ Special Counsel said was that after he and his team had interviewed Biden for several hours they - to put it bluntly - deemed that he was "non compos mentis". In law, when a Judge declare a defendant "non compos mentis," it means he lacks the mental faculties (memory, rational cognition, understanding) to be able to defend himself. He is so feeble-minded that the process of, say, cross - examining him would be meaningless/pointless. Its like a Judge saying an adult with Down Syndrome cannot face trial, because obviously they would have not understanding of any of the legal processes/argument/advice from their defence council, etc; that would take place in their trail. "non compos mentis" (means unfit to stand trail due to having "an unsound mind", that is, in legal terms, being INSANE.)



The DOJ Special Counsel, Robert Hur's (388 page) report in Biden's was released on the 8th Feb this year, and it basically said we have evidence that Biden wilfully and recklessly mishandled/illegally retained government Classified Documents (some marked "Top Secret") over a period many years (since the time he was a Senator) and so on and so on. So, the Special Council had enough evidence to nail Biden if he (Hur) had pressed charges. Biden would definitely have been found guilty in any Court trial.



But Robert Hur DROPPED all criminal charges because he and his team - after questioning Biden for at least 5 1/2 hours, could see that he was (legally} of "unsound mind", and lacked the mental acuity to stand trial in court.



Biden should obviously be removed from office immediately. But the only way to force him to stand down as President is the 25th Amendment. There is no point in using the 25th Amendment as it requires a yes (remove the "President on account mental incompetence) from the VP and a majority of Biden's own cabinet, and there's no was that these Democrats would vote to oust Biden if he were subjected to the 25th Amendment. Which highlights the absurdity of the 25th Amendment as politicians are not expert physicians (with very rare exception), and if a President is suspected of being mentally of physically too impaired to carry out the responsibilities /duties of POTUS, surely a team of scrupulously independent, expert, specialist doctors must be the ones to make such a determination. Not an animated dildo like VP, Kamala Harris, or a slippery shyster like, Winkin' Blinkin, or a horrible, little cunt like Alejhandro Mayorkas, etc.




Dachshund - the WONDER HOUND

DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !!

 

[archives]

What the DOJ Special Counsel said was that after he and his team had interviewed Biden for several hours they - to put it bluntly - deemed that he was "non compos mentis". In law, when a Judge declare a defendant "non compos mentis," it means he lacks the mental faculties (memory, rational cognition, understanding) to be able to defend himself. He is so feeble-minded that the process of, say, cross - examining him would be meaningless/pointless. Its like a Judge saying an adult with Down Syndrome cannot face trial, because obviously they would have not understanding of any of the legal processes/argument/advice from their defence council, etc; that would take place in their trail. "non compos mentis" (means unfit to stand trail due to having "an unsound mind", that is, in legal terms, being INSANE.)



The DOJ Special Counsel, Robert Hur's (388 page) report in Biden's was released on the 8th Feb this year, and it basically said we have evidence that Biden wilfully and recklessly mishandled/illegally retained government Classified Documents (some marked "Top Secret") over a period many years (since the time he was a Senator) and so on and so on. So, the Special Council had enough evidence to nail Biden if he (Hur) had pressed charges. Biden would definitely have been found guilty in any Court trial.



But Robert Hur DROPPED all criminal charges because he and his team - after questioning Biden for at least 5 1/2 hours, could see that he was (legally} of "unsound mind", and lacked the mental acuity to stand trial in court.



Biden should obviously be removed from office immediately. But the only way to force him to stand down as President is the 25th Amendment. There is no point in using the 25th Amendment as it requires a yes (remove the "President on account mental incompetence) from the VP and a majority of Biden's own cabinet, and there's no was that these Democrats would vote to oust Biden if he were subjected to the 25th Amendment. Which highlights the absurdity of the 25th Amendment as politicians are not expert physicians (with very rare exception), and if a President is suspected of being mentally of physically too impaired to carry out the responsibilities /duties of POTUS, surely a team of scrupulously independent, expert, specialist doctors must be the ones to make such a determination. Not an animated dildo like VP, Kamala Harris, or a slippery shyster like, Winkin' Blinkin, or a horrible, little cunt like Alejhandro Mayorkas, etc.




Dachshund - the WONDER HOUND

DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !!

Wrong

Back your claim up, show us exactly in Hur’s report, the primary source, not some copy and pasted post, but Hur’s report, where it says Biden was "non compos mentis,” and which in “legal terms being INSANE”

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf

 

[Phantasmal]

What the DOJ Special Counsel said was that after he and his team had interviewed Biden for several hours they - to put it bluntly - deemed that he was "non compos mentis". In law, when a Judge declare a defendant "non compos mentis," it means he lacks the mental faculties (memory, rational cognition, understanding) to be able to defend himself. He is so feeble-minded that the process of, say, cross - examining him would be meaningless/pointless. Its like a Judge saying an adult with Down Syndrome cannot face trial, because obviously they would have not understanding of any of the legal processes/argument/advice from their defence council, etc; that would take place in their trail. "non compos mentis" (means unfit to stand trail due to having "an unsound mind", that is, in legal terms, being INSANE.)



The DOJ Special Counsel, Robert Hur's (388 page) report in Biden's was released on the 8th Feb this year, and it basically said we have evidence that Biden wilfully and recklessly mishandled/illegally retained government Classified Documents (some marked "Top Secret") over a period many years (since the time he was a Senator) and so on and so on. So, the Special Council had enough evidence to nail Biden if he (Hur) had pressed charges. Biden would definitely have been found guilty in any Court trial.



But Robert Hur DROPPED all criminal charges because he and his team - after questioning Biden for at least 5 1/2 hours, could see that he was (legally} of "unsound mind", and lacked the mental acuity to stand trial in court.



Biden should obviously be removed from office immediately. But the only way to force him to stand down as President is the 25th Amendment. There is no point in using the 25th Amendment as it requires a yes (remove the "President on account mental incompetence) from the VP and a majority of Biden's own cabinet, and there's no was that these Democrats would vote to oust Biden if he were subjected to the 25th Amendment. Which highlights the absurdity of the 25th Amendment as politicians are not expert physicians (with very rare exception), and if a President is suspected of being mentally of physically too impaired to carry out the responsibilities /duties of POTUS, surely a team of scrupulously independent, expert, specialist doctors must be the ones to make such a determination. Not an animated dildo like VP, Kamala Harris, or a slippery shyster like, Winkin' Blinkin, or a horrible, little cunt like Alejhandro Mayorkas, etc.




Dachshund - the WONDER HOUND

DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !!

A judge nor prosecutor can determine it on their own, they require an affidavit from several professionals. Hur did not get a professional affidavit.

 

[Dachshund]

Wrong

Back your claim up, show us exactly in Hur’s report, the primary source, not some copy and pasted post, but Hur’s report, where it says Biden was "non compos mentis,” and which in “legal terms being INSANE”

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf

Hur notes several times in his report the Biden's "mental faculties are seb-normal, he used the term "feeble" on one occasion; on another "confused", he also notes that his memory (a higher cignitive faculty) is - to put it bluntly -- "shot. Hur and his team have IMPLICITLY deemed Biden "non compos mentis", because they have clearly said they would not be pressing charges BECAUSE Biden's mental acuity was so lacking he would not be able to defend himself at trial.


Any anyway, let's cut the bullshit - are you seriously telling me that after watching Biden on MSM giving speeches/interviews, etc, you cannot clearly see the man has dementia (cognitive degenerate). (It is nothing to do with his age, BTW).


"Non compos mentis" is typically translated as "not of sound mind," in particular, in the context of brain damage that reduced mental acuity (through trauma), or a brain disorder like Vascular Dementia or Alzheimer's syndrome. And If one is not of sound mind[ , then one is not SANE. If one is not sane, one is INSANE./B] "INSANE", BTW, is NOT a medical term - it is purely a legal term. Psychiatrists/Clinical Psychologists do NOT use the tern "INSANE" in any of their diagnoses, prognoses etc.



Try to keep it real Anchovies !




Dachshund - the WONDER HOUND

DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !!

 

[Dachshund]

A judge nor prosecutor can determine it on their own, they require an affidavit from several professionals. Hur did not get a professional affidavit.

OK, I not familiar with the intricacies of the relevant law here.


So, here's an easy way to resolve any ambiguity.


All biden has to do is consent to some sessions of cognitive assessment with GENUINELY INDEPENDENT psychiatrists and/or neurologists.


If Biden is cofident that his mental acuity is not seriously impaired he should have no hesitation whatsoever in allowing his cognition to be assessed;( including, off course, that he agrees the results can be made public).


There are many very accurate and reliable clinical assessment instruments these experts have at hand. Generally speaking -(though not always)- these tests are quite brief and straight- forward.


Biden and his handlers know the full extent of his cognitive impairment (which is severe to say the least), so there is no way they would let Biden be tested (and the results made public).


Biden is "off with the "Pixies", Super -P, and DON'T tell me you can't see it as well. (Because LIES make BABY JESUS cry !!).




Dachshund - the WONDER HOUND

DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !!

 

[Phantasmal]

OK, I not familiar with the intricacies of the relevant law here.


So, here's an easy way to resolve any ambiguity.


All biden has to do is consent to some sessions of cognitive assessment with GENUINELY INDEPENDENT psychiatrists and/or neurologists.


If Biden is cofident that his mental acuity is not seriously impaired he should have no hesitation whatsoever in allowing his cognition to be assessed;( including, off course, that he agrees the results can be made public).


There are many very accurate and reliable clinical assessment instruments these experts have at hand. Generally speaking -(though not always)- these tests are quite brief and straight- forward.


Biden and his handlers know the full extent of his cognitive impairment (which is severe to say the least), so there is no way they would let Biden be tested (and the results made public).


Biden is "off with the "Pixies", Super -P, and DON'T tell me you can't see it as well. (Because LIES make BABY JESUS cry !!).




Dachshund - the WONDER HOUND

DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !!

Biden doesn’t have to do anything, it’s not Hurs place to make a medical evaluation.

It was very unprofessional for him to do so.

 

[Earl]

If course you do. You are so far up Trumps butt that you see no daylight. Do you believe Biden does not remember that? I do not. I know how much of a family man Biden is.

Well, no, Nordy.

Biden ‘willfully’ kept classified materials, had ‘poor memory’: Special counsel.

Those are crimes, Nordy, and he wasn’t prosecuted because he is a turnip.

Most people who commit crimes and are mentally incompetent are sent to mental institutions.

 

[Earl]

Biden is the first sitting president in history to be declared legally incompetent to stand trial.

If he's not competent to be prosecuted, how can he be competent to sign laws and Executive Orders?
Credit to Lionfish

 

[ExpressLane]

Why? All SP reports are not released to the public, never have been, and other than Jimmy Jordan calling for his thousandth investigation, any repercussions wouldn’t have been felt prior to the election. Besides, Garland could have edited out the editorial sections of the report, the AG does get final review, nit he didn’t

And yes Barr did release the Musller repor, with redactions, however, as no AG had ever done before, he called a press conference beforehand and purposely framed the report to be interpreted the he wanted, or should I say, Trump demanded. He didn’t just deliver the report and let the public come to their own conclusions

Got anything else?

The only thing redacted from the Mueller report was information about ONGOING investigations. Garland didn't have any ongoing investigations in the Hur report.

 

[ExpressLane]

Biden is the first sitting president in history to be declared legally incompetent to stand trial.

If he's not competent to be prosecuted, how can he be competent to sign laws and Executive Orders?
Credit to Lionfish

He isn't

 

[Nordberg]

Well, no, Nordy.

Biden ‘willfully’ kept classified materials, had ‘poor memory’: Special counsel.

Those are crimes, Nordy, and he wasn’t prosecuted because he is a turnip.

Most people who commit crimes and are mentally incompetent are sent to mental institutions.

One right-wing Trumpian prosecutor Hur said that. he does not speak for the justice dept. He is interviewing for a big job if Trump steals the election.
Biden is not a turnip. He is your president and he has done a good job for almost 4 years.