DOGE staffer admits Elon Musk’s cost-cutting agency failed to reduce the federal deficit

I do not think that though. I think the country does better when Republicans control the purse strings if a Dem is in office. I will say that it is my experience that if the Rs control the purse strings and a populist jackwipe is in the WH that claims to be republican they turn into spendthrifts...
Right so the ideal is a Dem POTUS though right.?

We can point at who was below when Obama handed off a booming economy to Trump. Or who was below when Biden handed off an economy that was the envy off the world. Or who was below when Clinton handed over the booming economy and what the impact of those people below were but what we CANNOT dispute is whenever the potus hands over a good economy it is a Dem and whenever they hand over shit it a republican.

Right?
 
I mean if Trump again hands over shot at the end of this term there will be endless claims it is not on Trump so I am bypassing that argument and just pointing out the one fact we should all agree on.

Republican potus always hand over shit to Dems who always hand over good ones to them
 
I mean if Trump again hands over shot at the end of this term there will be endless claims it is not on Trump so I am bypassing that argument and just pointing out the one fact we should all agree on.

Republican potus always hand over shit to Dems who always hand over good ones to them
The problem you have here is you "think" but are stupid at the same time, you are "just pointing out" what you think, but stupidly ignore all the relevant factors because you like the jersey of one factor... You added up 3 and 3 and came up with 5 and declared it right.

Only an idiot ignores who holds Congress when gains happen. I'd go so far as to say we do best with split power, if the Congress is held by Republicans while a D is in the WH. When the twain match up they go a bit nuts.
 
The problem you have here is you "think" but are stupid at the same time, you are "just pointing out" what you think, but stupidly ignore all the relevant factors because you like the jersey of one factor... You added up 3 and 3 and came up with 5 and declared it right.

Only an idiot ignores who holds Congress when gains happen. I'd go so far as to say we do best with split power, if the Congress is held by Republicans while a D is in the WH. When the twain match up they go a bit nuts.
And the problem you have is you are too dumb to follow a conversation.

I have said, consider who is in COngress with one DEM potus and ignore who is in Congress with the other. Same for Republican Potus.

Those factors ALWAYS CHANGE.

What does NOT CHANGE is that Dem potus always end up being given shit economies from Republican and then handing back good economies to the Republican one.

That is REGARDLESS of the factor you want to consider for one or all POTUS.

And what basic logic tells you is that if you sometimes the Dems have a republican congress, other times a Dem congress and yet another a split congress, and the Republican potus have also the same mix BUT EACH AND EVERY TIME Dems end up providing a solid economy in the hand off and republicans a shit one, only a dunce does not see the ONE CONSISTENT factor.

You are a dunce Damo that you are unable to see it.
 
And the problem you have is you are too dumb to follow a conversation.
This is you looking in the mirror and telling the person you see he looks just like you, and thinking you are looking at the guy on the phone.

I have said, consider who is in COngress with one DEM potus and ignore who is in Congress with the other. Same for Republican Potus.

Those factors ALWAYS CHANGE.
Derp... However, when Dem Congress and Dem or Republican President we get 14.8% inflation rates. When we get a split with even just the Senate being held by republicans things begin to change.
What does NOT CHANGE is that Dem potus always end up being given shit economies from Republican and then handing back good economies to the Republican one.
What does not change is democrat majority Congress tends to muck up stuff, Presidents tend to lose their majorities, the other party takes over, republicans working with (or against) a Dem President tend to combine to make a better combination than Democrats taking over with a republican in office... Especially lately when they begin to focus on stupid rubbish like unsuccessful impeachment bids wasting our time and money on useless nonsense.
That is REGARDLESS of the factor you want to consider for one or all POTUS.

And what basic logic tells you is that if you sometimes the Dems have a republican congress, other times a Dem congress and yet another a split congress, and the Republican potus have also the same mix BUT EACH AND EVERY TIME Dems end up providing a solid economy in the hand off and republicans a shit one, only a dunce does not see the ONE CONSISTENT factor.

You are a dunce Damo that you are unable to see it.
What is "regardless" is clearly that you ignore every other factor than the color of the jersey on the one factor that does not control the purse strings of the nation and stupidly think you have made a point.

This is because, as I have told you repeatedly, you "think" but you are still just flat stupid. Especially when it comes to economics, money, or simply identifying sarcasm, in pretty much every aspect you scream out "stupid".

You should understand how stupid you are by your incapacity to identify sarcasm. It is a true sign of a low intelligence.
 
Anyway, it isn't the party that makes it happen, it is the interaction between the two parties once there is a split. If it happens in the right direction... we tend to get a better result.
 
This is you looking in the mirror and telling the person you see he looks just like you, and thinking you are looking at the guy on the phone.


Derp... However, when Dem Congress and Dem or Republican President we get 14.8% inflation rates. When we get a split with even just the Senate being held by republicans things begin to change.

What does not change is democrat majority Congress tends to muck up stuff, Presidents tend to lose their majorities, the other party takes over, republicans working with (or against) a Dem President tend to combine to make a better combination than Democrats taking over with a republican in office... Especially lately when they begin to focus on stupid rubbish like unsuccessful impeachment bids wasting our time and money on useless nonsense.

What is "regardless" is clearly that you ignore every other factor than the color of the jersey on the one factor that does not control the purse strings of the nation and stupidly think you have made a point.

This is because, as I have told you repeatedly, you "think" but you are still just flat stupid. Especially when it comes to economics, money, or simply identifying sarcasm, in pretty much every aspect you scream out "stupid".

You should understand how stupid you are by your incapacity to identify sarcasm. It is a true sign of a low intelligence.
But what i said DOES NOT CHANGE.

it is Dem POTUS after Dem POTUS who inherits an absolute shit economy from the Republican one...

And it is Republican POTUS after republican POTUS who inherit one from the Dem POTUS, that are leading the world upon recovering from the shit the republicans gave them.


That is undenyable FACT regardless of you trying to say 'ya but Clinton had republican House and Senate... OBama had Dem ones, etc, etc'.

YES those things all do change and i am not disputing that. What does NOT CHANGE and what you CANNOT deny, is regardless of those changes Dem Potus inherit shit and hand over to the next Republican POTUS world leading economies that are booming or on the upswing from the shit they were handed.

You agree?

I mean ... you cannot disagree... not if you want to be correct
 

Staffer Admits DOGE Didn't Actually Reduce The Federal Deficit In Mind-Numbing Deposition—But He Has No Regrets​


Let me reply for @Damocles ...

"Ya guys, i knew that all along which is why i created the satire thread to mock Doge. Never believed it for a minute. Nope, did not fall for it'.

rickroll123.gif
 
Let me reply for @Damocles ...

"Ya guys, i knew that all along which is why i created the satire thread to mock Doge. Never believed it for a minute. Nope, did not fall for it'.

rickroll123.gif
Dammo is 100% magat and we all see how ridic he has gotten lately. Defending everything that sick sob does. To each their own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
Back
Top