You seem to have left out that the Democrates do exactly the same thing.
There are those, on both sides, that seem to believe that if they say something long enough, that it BECOMES truth.
Nice straw man, but I never called you a Democrat. The Civil War was clearly between Democrats and Republicans. Many of the mountain counties in the South were then as they are today GOP territory and thus resisted the Confederacy. You really should learn your history before trying to argue it.
Typical liberal accuses me of exactly what she does. LOL.See soc......this is why this board bickers the way it does. Other than a couple of conservatives who actually offer up good meaningful debate, we most of the cons on this board are idiots like the one quoted above who can't even comprehend their own shit that they spew, let alone reality.
You dumbass, Calhoun was writing about REAL, contemporary matters as one trained political scientist to an esteemed colleague in the field. There was nothing hypothetical about it. He had studied his Southern culture closely, which is largely what made him the political leader of the South from 1830 to 1850.
I don't mind the disagreement, it's just the make-believe nonsensical horseshit lying that bothers the shit out of me.
There are two threads on the other forum started in the last ten minutes that are unadulterated horseshit lies (the first: Obama is an American dictator for appointing people to positions that have existed since the Eisenhower administration; the second: the Democrats want make private health insurance illegal). I mean, I understand that when you have no ideas you resort to just attacking the ideas of the other party, but the lying just grows tiresome.
Typical liberal accuses me of exactly what she does. LOL.
Typical liberal accuses me of exactly what she does. LOL.
no kidding....pwned herself..![]()
Nearly all of them. *shrug*Please post an example of me not comprehending my own post. ...
Nearly all of them. *shrug*
With regards to my recent exchange with BAC, he was referring to himself as a Northerner; he failed to understand the true nature of the Civil War, which was of course political not simply geographical. It seems that you failed to comprehend that as well.
ooooooooo, I think that was a put down...and it urt reel badd...
:![]()
I didn't imply that at all, as stated. *shrug*If you think he was referring to himself as a 'Northerner' why did you imply he was a 'Democrat'?
I didn't imply that at all, as stated. *shrug*
Please post an example of me not comprehending my own post.
I'll go first.
BAC: We have brains .. you don't.
SouthernComforts response to BAC: LOL Some brains you have. As I recall the Democrats lost last time as well, even with guns and the know-how to use them.
BAC: ...I'm not a democrat
SouthernComfort backpeddles: Nice straw man, but I never called you a Democrat
_____________________________________________
How in the world are you supposed to have an honest debate with horse shit like this?
If you think he was referring to himself as a 'Northerner' why did you imply he was a 'Democrat'?
I didn't imply that at all, as stated. *shrug*
I rest my case.
You people are all morons. That is all.
LOL as if you're qualified.I'm prepared to make a ruling on this.
SM = pwned.
You've had him fumbling for words .. he couldn't find any that even made sense to him .. so he just gave up.
Conflict is a good thing. It exposes the weak argument.