Does this dildo head ever stop?

Canceled2

Banned
This spendthrift needs to fricking GO!
____________________________________________


President Obama campaigned this week for "new and innovative approaches" to America's economic crisis. So naturally, the futurist-in-chief filched his fresh, bold ideas straight from...the 1930s. The grand new solution to the jobs deficit, according to the White House, is more FDR-style federal job-training spending.

Sounding every bit like the whiteboard eggheads who keep spinning around the Ivy League-Washington revolving door, Obama announced breathlessly: "If we could match up schools and businesses, we could create pipelines right from the classroom to the office or the factory floor. This would help workers find better jobs, and it would help companies find the highly educated and highly trained people that they need in order to prosper and to remain competitive."

In Obama World, private businesses are just too darned dumb to figure out how to connect the dots and create these pipelines for themselves.

In the real world, private businesses spend up to 12 times more on job-training programs and trainee salaries than state and federal governments combined, according to workforce analysts. The American Society for Training and Development reports that U.S. private entities spent an estimated $125.9 billion on employee learning and development in 2009 alone. And you can bet in these financial hard times that private-sector employers are making sure every job-training penny is well spent.

As for your tax dollars, rest assured they are being squandered the same way public-sector job trainers have been squandering such funding for the past eight decades. Earlier this year, a General Accounting Office report found that no one in the bowels of the Beltway really knows how effective the feds' $18 billion a year spent on 47 separate job-training programs run by nine different agencies really is. That's because half of those programs haven't undergone a performance review since 2004, and only five have ever conducted research on whether job seekers in the program do better than those who weren't enrolled.

Among those five, the GAO wrote, the evaluators "generally found the effects of participation were not consistent across programs, with only some demonstrating positive impacts that tended to be small, inconclusive or restricted to short-term impacts."

read more here
 
This spendthrift needs to fricking GO!
____________________________________________


President Obama campaigned this week for "new and innovative approaches" to America's economic crisis. So naturally, the futurist-in-chief filched his fresh, bold ideas straight from...the 1930s. The grand new solution to the jobs deficit, according to the White House, is more FDR-style federal job-training spending.

Sounding every bit like the whiteboard eggheads who keep spinning around the Ivy League-Washington revolving door, Obama announced breathlessly: "If we could match up schools and businesses, we could create pipelines right from the classroom to the office or the factory floor. This would help workers find better jobs, and it would help companies find the highly educated and highly trained people that they need in order to prosper and to remain competitive."

In Obama World, private businesses are just too darned dumb to figure out how to connect the dots and create these pipelines for themselves.

In the real world, private businesses spend up to 12 times more on job-training programs and trainee salaries than state and federal governments combined, according to workforce analysts. The American Society for Training and Development reports that U.S. private entities spent an estimated $125.9 billion on employee learning and development in 2009 alone. And you can bet in these financial hard times that private-sector employers are making sure every job-training penny is well spent.

As for your tax dollars, rest assured they are being squandered the same way public-sector job trainers have been squandering such funding for the past eight decades. Earlier this year, a General Accounting Office report found that no one in the bowels of the Beltway really knows how effective the feds' $18 billion a year spent on 47 separate job-training programs run by nine different agencies really is. That's because half of those programs haven't undergone a performance review since 2004, and only five have ever conducted research on whether job seekers in the program do better than those who weren't enrolled.

Among those five, the GAO wrote, the evaluators "generally found the effects of participation were not consistent across programs, with only some demonstrating positive impacts that tended to be small, inconclusive or restricted to short-term impacts."

read more here

The moment I saw that this post was longer than a sentence or two and contained no fat jokes, I knew it must be the latest cut-n-paste job from Cathy cut-n-paste.

And LO and behold...follow the link and it takes you to an OPINION PIECE from none other than PARTISAN HACK Michelle Malkin.

Oh if only poor Cathy had the IQ to write up her OWN opinions and not just "appropriate" everyone else's opinions.
 
This spendthrift needs to fricking GO!
____________________________________________


President Obama campaigned this week for "new and innovative approaches" to America's economic crisis. So naturally, the futurist-in-chief filched his fresh, bold ideas straight from...the 1930s. The grand new solution to the jobs deficit, according to the White House, is more FDR-style federal job-training spending.

Sounding every bit like the whiteboard eggheads who keep spinning around the Ivy League-Washington revolving door, Obama announced breathlessly: "If we could match up schools and businesses, we could create pipelines right from the classroom to the office or the factory floor. This would help workers find better jobs, and it would help companies find the highly educated and highly trained people that they need in order to prosper and to remain competitive."

In Obama World, private businesses are just too darned dumb to figure out how to connect the dots and create these pipelines for themselves.

In the real world, private businesses spend up to 12 times more on job-training programs and trainee salaries than state and federal governments combined, according to workforce analysts. The American Society for Training and Development reports that U.S. private entities spent an estimated $125.9 billion on employee learning and development in 2009 alone. And you can bet in these financial hard times that private-sector employers are making sure every job-training penny is well spent.

As for your tax dollars, rest assured they are being squandered the same way public-sector job trainers have been squandering such funding for the past eight decades. Earlier this year, a General Accounting Office report found that no one in the bowels of the Beltway really knows how effective the feds' $18 billion a year spent on 47 separate job-training programs run by nine different agencies really is. That's because half of those programs haven't undergone a performance review since 2004, and only five have ever conducted research on whether job seekers in the program do better than those who weren't enrolled.

Among those five, the GAO wrote, the evaluators "generally found the effects of participation were not consistent across programs, with only some demonstrating positive impacts that tended to be small, inconclusive or restricted to short-term impacts."

read more here

Woah...Geez!

I read the thread title and thought to myself that Ice Dancer must have FINALLY found herself a new "boyfriend"...

Well I guess even I can be wrong...
 
The moment I saw that this post was longer than a sentence or two and contained no fat jokes, I knew it must be the latest cut-n-paste job from Cathy cut-n-paste.

And LO and behold...follow the link and it takes you to an OPINION PIECE from none other than PARTISAN HACK Michelle Malkin.

Oh if only poor Cathy had the IQ to write up her OWN opinions and not just "appropriate" everyone else's opinions.

When's the last time YOU posted an original thought? You know, one that hasn't been parroted by HuffPo, MoveOn, or MediaMatters? When is the last time you posted something of your OWN opinion, which wasn't previously articulated by some other pinhead you read somewhere? Seems to me, you are quite the hypocrite here, calling someone out for cut-n-paste.
 
When's the last time YOU posted an original thought? You know, one that hasn't been parroted by HuffPo, MoveOn, or MediaMatters? When is the last time you posted something of your OWN opinion, which wasn't previously articulated by some other pinhead you read somewhere? Seems to me, you are quite the hypocrite here, calling someone out for cut-n-paste.

OH NO-not another poster who calls out fatzap on his hypocritical hyperbole :rofl:

Anyway, cut-n-pastes are appropriate to begin a conversation where one can then defend their opinion, which in this case is obviously shared by myself and Miss Malkin.
 
The moment I saw that this post was longer than a sentence or two and contained no fat jokes, I knew it must be the latest cut-n-paste job from Cathy cut-n-paste.

And LO and behold...follow the link and it takes you to an OPINION PIECE from none other than PARTISAN HACK Michelle Malkin.

Oh if only poor Cathy had the IQ to write up her OWN opinions and not just "appropriate" everyone else's opinions.

Wow, that's weak. Can't refute the opinion, pretend that she didn't provide a link? I don't know what you are reaching for here, I just know that you didn't get your mitts on it yet.
 
When's the last time YOU posted an original thought? You know, one that hasn't been parroted by HuffPo, MoveOn, or MediaMatters? When is the last time you posted something of your OWN opinion, which wasn't previously articulated by some other pinhead you read somewhere? Seems to me, you are quite the hypocrite here, calling someone out for cut-n-paste.

Of course I wouldn't expect you to acknowledge it here because it only proves how full of it you are...but you DO remember the discussion we had about Rep Weiner and whether he should resign or not?

Remember hou tried to paint me as "immoral" because you incorrectly believed that I had not called for Weiner's resignation. (Gotta read the WHOLE thread if you're going to make allegations like that) I then pointed you to the PAGE ONE POST BY ME calling for his resignation, you ran away like a little girl before you could admit you'd screwed up.
 
Woah...Geez!

I read the thread title and thought to myself that Ice Dancer must have FINALLY found herself a new "boyfriend"...

Well I guess even I can be wrong...

Now there's some serious debate, directly in the current vein of "civil discourse" that we've heard so much about from the left. I'm proud of you.

Let me refute this awesome point on the actual subject of the thread, and I will do it in the same manner and with the true civility you've shown to everybody here.

Zappa are a poopie-head!
 
Now there's some serious debate, directly in the current vein of "civil discourse" that we've heard so much about from the left. I'm proud of you.

Let me refute this awesome point on the actual subject of the thread, and I will do it in the same manner and with the true civility you've shown to everybody here.

Zappa are a poopie-head!

Of course, no one will find ol even-handed Damo addressing the civility of the thread title, which sets the tone for discussion even before the thread is opened...I was merely responding in kind to Ice Dancer's oh so civil thread title.

But of course Damo just ignores that little fact...

Who here thinks ol Damo is sweet on ID? One certainly doesn't have to look far to find Damo with his lips pressed firmly against her cellulite mottled backside.
 
Now there's some serious debate, directly in the current vein of "civil discourse" that we've heard so much about from the left. I'm proud of you.

Let me refute this awesome point on the actual subject of the thread, and I will do it in the same manner and with the true civility you've shown to everybody here.

Zappa are a poopie-head!

Dealing with the fact that Obama's great new plan is to spend even more money on an idea that has no hope of success isn't something zap can debate. My ability to have boyfriends is much more interesting to him-of course given his obsession with my personal life, it's totally understandable ;)
 
The moment I saw that this post was longer than a sentence or two and contained no fat jokes, I knew it must be the latest cut-n-paste job from Cathy cut-n-paste.

And LO and behold...follow the link and it takes you to an OPINION PIECE from none other than PARTISAN HACK Michelle Malkin.

Oh if only poor Cathy had the IQ to write up her OWN opinions and not just "appropriate" everyone else's opinions.

another example of "civility" from the lying hypocrite zappygetard who demands others be civil but cannot be civil himself

what a tool
 
another example of "civility" from the lying hypocrite zappygetard who demands others be civil but cannot be civil himself

what a tool

Great to see you calling out ID for the thread title.

LOL - do you ever get tired of pwning yourself?
 
Now there's some serious debate, directly in the current vein of "civil discourse" that we've heard so much about from the left. I'm proud of you.

Let me refute this awesome point on the actual subject of the thread, and I will do it in the same manner and with the true civility you've shown to everybody here.

Zappa are a poopie-head!

with zappa, it is a step further, as he has run around the board WHINING that others are not civil and that we should have civil discourse, yet, he is incapable of engaging in any himself

the hypocrisy is so blatent it is hilarious
 
The title is apropos` to the idiocy the dildohead is proposing-would you feel better if yurt called me out on an appropriate title...or how about you address the dildo heads spending plan?

onceler is just a little liar hack who demands the right call out each other for whatever he dreams up on a given day, yet, you will notice he NEVER, EVER calls the left out for the same thing

80% of his posts are nothing but lies and trolls
 
Of course, no one will find ol even-handed Damo addressing the civility of the thread title, which sets the tone for discussion even before the thread is opened...I was merely responding in kind to Ice Dancer's oh so civil thread title.

But of course Damo just ignores that little fact...

Who here thinks ol Damo is sweet on ID? One certainly doesn't have to look far to find Damo with his lips pressed firmly against her cellulite mottled backside.

Let me get this straight. You are still not addressing the actual point of the thread and are still trying to claim some moral high ground? Nothing like a huge dose of hypocrite to get you going in the morning.

Now, had I opened up thread after thread lecturing others on "civility" you might have a point. But I really haven't.

However, I will address you actual point here: Zappa are still a poopie-head! Neener, neener foo-foo, Zappa smells like poo-poo!
 
onceler is just a little liar hack who demands the right call out each other for whatever he dreams up on a given day, yet, you will notice he NEVER, EVER calls the left out for the same thing

80% of his posts are nothing but lies and trolls


I want you to call me out all the time yurt so we can help duncler feel better :D
 
Anyway, he's a lawyer ID, not an economist, and he surrounds himself with people who imperfectly understand only Keynesian theories. They are incapable of remembering that all that money they borrowed to waste on foolishness should have been spent on infrastructure if they were truly following Keynes' theories.
 
onceler is just a little liar hack who demands the right call out each other for whatever he dreams up on a given day, yet, you will notice he NEVER, EVER calls the left out for the same thing

80% of his posts are nothing but lies and trolls

It's hilarious reading this kind of response. Some of your posts - like this one - are 100% pure, unadulterated projection...
 
Back
Top