Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Please explain to me Wacko what is the difference between this and inheriting money from your wealthy parents?
Does Bill have dementia?
- Thread starter cawacko
- Start date
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Goldman Sachs probably don't give a shit about the content of her speeches, it is all about buying her patronage. You must know that!!
Sent from my LENOVO Lenovo K50-t5 Using Ez Forum for Android
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
I've written and published a lot of things over the years, none of which you should have any access to since you have no right to know my name. You have no right to be threatening to post anything here that would reveal my name. So you apparently were attempting to trick me into "consenting" to having myself outed. And you admitted to sending this information to two posters here who "hate me". This is all against the rules, let's see what the useless mods do about it. My guess is nothing. I guess that's why you keep pushing the envelope here, you know how useless the mods are now.
As for Christie, she blabbed to you and you keep repeating it on this board. She blabbed to ILA and he repeated that on this board. I don't hate her at all, I just think she's fucking dumb. I'm sorry if she hates me. Hate is no good for you.
it might be a secret sauce speech ( trade secrets)..oh wait she doesn't do private enterprise.. Maybe they really,really like her?
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Yes I know your name from way back on the Netscape boards. Christie thinks you are a psycho but then so does pretty much everybody on here apart from a few Darlaks. I wasn't threatening anything, I asked for your permission so how the fuck is that a threat??
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
You don't have any right to know my name, I never posted it, if you got it on Netscape you obtained it through nefarious means and nefarious posters. You have no right to this information, you have no right to be PM'ing it to people as you have admitted to doing, you have no right to be discussing it on this board. It is personal information that you have no right to. You do not have my consent to pass it on, discuss it on this board, or talk about it at all.
cawacko
Well-known member
What does inheriting money have to do with what's being discussed here?
cancel2 2022
Canceled
You have no right to call my wife a suckee fuckee, only racist cunts do that sort of thing!! As to being nefarious, I seem to recall that Rana told me. Might be wrong though, it was a long time ago. By the way, I heard that you like sex with dogs, so does that make you a fidophile?
Last edited:
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
You're confused Asperger boy. Calling your wife a whore is not against the rules, just like you abused those rules to write months of filthy sexual posts about me, and squealed like the hit weasel when you got it back. No wonder you love Trump...that's Trumpian.
However, posting, PM'ing, or threatening to post, or discussing personal info here is against the rules.
Yeah sure, Rana told you my real name. Do you think I'm going to believe that and get mad at Rana? You must think I'm as dumb as your friend!
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Believe what you like, you always have anyway. I don't love Trump but I detest him less than Hills. I want to give him a chance at least, if he fucks up then he won't get a second term. Maybe the Democrats will able to come up with a decent woman candidate in the meantime? As for calling my wife racist names, it truly exposes your hypocrisy to all and that gratifies me greatly. I know it not against the rules but I'm sure that any genuine feminist would be horrified at somebody like you that claims to be one using such racist language. If my wife was black would you call her a nigger crack whore?
Last edited:
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
Excuse me asperberger boy, I don't give a flying fuck about your fart like thoughts on Hillary, Trump, Christiefan, whatever. I care that you have admitted right here to passing my personal info to at least two other posters, that you attempted to trick me into giving "consent" (any surprise a rapist like you doesn't understand consent?) to having my personal identity posted on the board, are discussing my writings on this board, and now I have been informed you actually posted something on this board that could be used, easily, to find my identity. Apparently it was removed. And I want to know why you aren't banned.
That is all I care about.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
I haven't admitted to passing on anything, I said two others know that's not the same thing. I think you are a despicable cunt and so does most of the board. I just love how you go so fucking apeshit, it is truly a wonder to see. Why anybody gives you the time of day is a total mystery to me.
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
It's exactly the same thing. Maybe the whole board thinks I'm a despicable cunt, maybe all the mods think I'm a despicable cunt, but that doesn't change the fact that you are breaking the rules over and over in this thread. And whether or not something is done about it is going to speak volumes.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
All the mods do think you are a despicable cunt, apart from Rana of course, so good luck with that. I am off on my hols next week anyway, could do with a break from nasty cuntettes like you.
Niche Political Commentor
Wear a mask
Tom isn't banned because he didn't break the rules/do enough to warrant a ban in the mod teams view
1) Your name was not attached to the article when he posted it. He actually purposefully left it out. We also felt that there was no intention to dox you by going through a convoluted series of assumptions that people might A) google the article, B) find a name attached to the article, C) automatically conclude it was you that wrote it. We felt it was far more likely he was just trying to expose your hypocrisy. Nevertheless, we took the path of least resistance and deleted the thread and warned tom to not post it again, just to be on the safe side. Giving people warnings is not a rarity around these parts. We even give them for rule 12b stuff. If things are a grey area but we don't feel someone has gone explicitly over the line, they may get a warning. Tom got a warning, the matter was addressed.
2) You keep claiming tom has "admitted" that he has passed the info around to at least two other people.. however you have not once presented us with any evidence of this. What he has said is that two other people know about it. This could refer to rana and myself, the two mods that initially handled the post in question. It could also refer to someone that sent the article to HIM and someone else, which he really wouldn't be at fault for. He could also be talking about 1 person that sent it to him...and myself the mod, as he knows 100% that I saw it given I pm'd him about it. Fourth, it could be that two other people know about it independently.
3) You have remarked that he has been trying to "trick you into consent" into allowing him to post the article. This is also, not against the rules. We have people all the time ask if they can post a pm someone sent them. The whole point is he is asking for permission. You have said no and Tom has respected that. It's not against the rules for him to ask though.
4) You talk about tom referencing the article in its vague form. The board merely knowing of the existence of an article does not break our rules. Nothing can be gleaned from the information that "one time darla wrote an article about hillary clinton." It's not like that really narrowed down the field.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
One of the people was indeed you.
For the record. I cut off all contact with Darla more than two years ago because of the lies, accusations and ugliness she wrote to and about me here and in email. I haven't responded to her posts or her comments despite all the baiting from several people here. Anybody who takes the time to research this on JPP will know it's true.
I don't talk about Darla on this forum, in PM, phone, or in email. I was DONE with Darla years ago and have zero interest in anything she says or does. I could not care less about Darla's life, the people in it, or anything about it. Darla was pissed off at me for years because she couldn't get me to turn against a friend and that's a fact. Darla needs to think she's living rent-free in my head because that's the way big egos operate.
Let's get something else straight. I barely knew Darla eight years ago on Netscape, let alone that she had articles published. So whatever this latest accusation, I was not the person who sent any article to any person, in fact to my knowledge I've never even read an article by Darla on any other site.
At one time I thought Darla was a trustworthy person. I was fooled and I was wrong. Shame on me for being so gullible. When I finally understood that fact I cut off contact for good. DONE.
When I logged on a few minutes ago I saw there was a PM from Canceled.2016.11. That PM is now somewhere in cyberspace, deleted and unread. Because that's how little interest I have in anything Darla has to say.
DONE.
I don't talk about Darla on this forum, in PM, phone, or in email. I was DONE with Darla years ago and have zero interest in anything she says or does. I could not care less about Darla's life, the people in it, or anything about it. Darla was pissed off at me for years because she couldn't get me to turn against a friend and that's a fact. Darla needs to think she's living rent-free in my head because that's the way big egos operate.
Let's get something else straight. I barely knew Darla eight years ago on Netscape, let alone that she had articles published. So whatever this latest accusation, I was not the person who sent any article to any person, in fact to my knowledge I've never even read an article by Darla on any other site.
At one time I thought Darla was a trustworthy person. I was fooled and I was wrong. Shame on me for being so gullible. When I finally understood that fact I cut off contact for good. DONE.
When I logged on a few minutes ago I saw there was a PM from Canceled.2016.11. That PM is now somewhere in cyberspace, deleted and unread. Because that's how little interest I have in anything Darla has to say.
DONE.
He is absolutely lying, I have, nor will I ever, on here or on Netscape given anyone's personal information out. I am greatly disappointed that Tom would make this accusation against me. It shows his real character these days. I thank you for not believing him. It is tragic what has become of him.
Airstrip One
Completely Effed
You people are entertaining.
