Do you think they have much on Comey?

But, just like in the Old South, when you have a corrupt prosecutor (Bragg) who boasts he's out to get someone, and then has the help of a judge that will play fast and loose with the rules, the two can sway a jury--particularly one that doesn't like the defendant--to convict someone on bullshit charges or bend the law into a pretzel to get a conviction.

Comey clearly lied to Congress. There's plenty of evidence of that. He did so to run cover for the disaster Russiagate became. If he should be pointing a finger at anyone, it's the Hildabeast. After all, she was the one that set this up to happen. For her, that isn't new. She was fired from work on Watergate as a young lawyer for proposing dirty tricks be used to get Nixon.
If Comey "clearly lied" what was the lie? Quote the lie and the exchange the lie was told in.

I as, as always you are a liar and full of shit, but i challenge you to prove me wrong.
 
Just like the Epstein debacle - "We're going to release the Epstein files - wait, TRUMP'S IN THEM? Nevermind there are NO Epstein files!"
Be honest, you have absolutely no idea how Trump keeps bitch-slapping the Democrats, right? You are befuddled. Your confusion is complete and transparent.

The answer is that all leftists are as stupid as you are, and I mean absolutely clueless. You leftists don't know a hoax from a hamburger, a turnip from a tariff, you only know how to regurgitate the baseless fear and panic you've been told to preach.

The Democrats are going to get shellacked in the midterms; I know this because you are my barometer. One wouldn't ever imagine that a group of adults could possibly all be this stupid, yet here you are. Will there even be a Democrat party after the midterms or will they have to rebrand completely? Oh well, it doesn't matter. If the Libertarians are smart they'll snatch up all they can from the last Democrats fleeing the party.

You're not smart enough to break free, right?
 
In the trial, they can easily add additional charges, and evidence shows they are warranted.

-
No they cannot you simpleton.

If the Grand Jury refused to indict on a charge and the trial is going forward with other charges then the only way the Prosecution can "Add additional charges" is to go back to the Grand Jury and seek a "Superseding Indictment" on the same charges they refused to indict on the first time.

So no, it would not be easy to get that grand jury to indict on charges they already refused to.
 
Where is the tape of him saying he approved a leak?

At 2:30 ish he said he had his buddy leak the content of his memos to the press.

A 2019 report by the Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General (OIG) concluded that former FBI Director James Comey violated agency policies by leaking memos of conversations with President Trump


Where is your apology I gave you EXACTLY what you asked for.
Wow. You really shouldn't rely on AI for your "facts."

The IG report said nothing about authorizing leaks to the press while he was FBI director which is what Comey is indicted for lying about.
 
As Gutfeld said, the opinions of the left are no longer relevant and will no longer be considered.

The Republicans have the House, the Senate, and the White House and conservatives outnumber liberals on the Supreme Court.

There is no need to consider these far left loons.

Payback is a bitch.
 
Last edited:
Indictments would have not come down on Comey unless there was an airtight case, you fucking morons.
Just because you don't know how to do things right doesn't mean others don't. :rolleyes2:
 
Back
Top