Do you think they have much on Comey?

BartenderElite said:
There is this thing called "proof."

All you guys have done for years is assumed. And no - I don't think Biden did anything behind the scenes. If you want to know why I believe that, look up what Ben Franklin had to say about people keeping a secret.
Click to expand...
Are you seriously going to say Biden didn't give the OK for the DOJ to go after Trump? Yes or No.
 
Jarod said:
Considering prosecutors resigned rather than producing this case, does anyone believe they have good evidence?
Click to expand...

It was solid enough for a grand jury to indict him. That's more than most of the charges brought against people associated with Trump who were charged with something got.
Jarod said:
What do you think are the chances of a conviction? We haven’t seen the evidence yet, but we will… any thoughts?
Click to expand...

I'd say based on federal win rates, Comey is going to prison.
Jarod said:
I’m wondering if the Defense will use Trumps stated desire to get his preceded “enemies” will be used as a part of Comey’s defense.
Click to expand...
They could try but the prosecution's counter is this went through the standard grand jury process with Trump out of the loop. I doubt the defense can come up with anything solid to counter that.
 
FastLane said:
Are you seriously going to say Biden didn't give the OK for the DOJ to go after Trump? Yes or No.
Click to expand...

I haven't seen anything to indicate Biden gave approval. But that's not even the point - there is NOTHING to indicate that he actually pressured the DOJ like we have seen Trump do publicly, and repeatedly.

There is no comparison. Anyone who wants proof can look at recent tweets, speeches or interviews from Trump. Nothing like that exists for Biden.
 
Nordberg said:
Daffy Donald owes his first presidency to Comey. Comey made a public announcement about finding new emails. It was not true. He made a mistake; they were already covered. Hillary was leading until then and she took a hit for it.
Comey's crime is not swearing allegiance to Trump instead of the Constitution. Mob boss Trump could not tolerate that.
Click to expand...
No Nuttyberg Hillary had classified information on her homebrew non government server . BY LAW she should have been prosecuted. And Comey should not have let her off the hook. The only reason Comey "investigated" her was because the NY FBI had her emails and were about to go public with the fact that they had them. Comey had no other choice but to announce that the FBI had them and would investigate Hillary. Comey's job was to investigate the AG's job is to decide to indict or not. Comey had ZERO authority to decide that Hillary should not be indicted. Hillary should have kissed Comey's feet for letting her get away with mishandling classified documents.
 
BartenderElite said:
I haven't seen anything to indicate Biden gave approval. But that's not even the point - there is NOTHING to indicate that he actually pressured the DOJ like we have seen Trump do publicly, and repeatedly.

There is no comparison. Anyone who wants proof can look at recent tweets, speeches or interviews from Trump. Nothing like that exists for Biden.
Click to expand...
Tell me if you think the DOJ went after a former President in over 240 years without the authorization from the POTUS. Stop spinning.
 
Cypress said:
That wasn't the question you were asked and answered.

You were specifically asked if you would support an innocent man being legally hounded into financial ruin.

Your disgusting answer to that question was "Yes".


You are just trying to backtrack and edit/modify the answer you gave.
Click to expand...
If the innocent man was Comey (I do not believe he is innocents) yes, prosecute and incarcerate him. No one has tried to murder him, as happened with Trump.

The far left loons can dish it out but they can not take it.

Poor babies, there is much more to come.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It was solid enough for a grand jury to indict him. That's more than most of the charges brought against people associated with Trump who were charged with something got.


I'd say based on federal win rates, Comey is going to prison.

They could try but the prosecution's counter is this went through the standard grand jury process with Trump out of the loop. I doubt the defense can come up with anything solid to counter that.
Click to expand...
You have to look at how many Democrats have been convicted in the Eastern district of Virginia where a whole bunch of government employees live.
 
QP! said:
Yes but i read the indictment core parts and the 'obstruction' charge is for 'lying to Congress' so it is two writings of a single action that must be adjudicated and decided by a jury of 'did the gov't prove beyond a reasonable doubt Comey lied'.

And lets put forth the worst case scenario and flip the IG findings to saying 'they thought Comey was the one misrepresenting but they could not conclude it was deliberate',... even under that most juries would not convict, as it is hard to be so sure, even if you think Comey did misrepresent, that he did not do so mistakenly.

As it is not against the law to make a mistake and be wrong and even if a jury does not think that is the case, the question that catches is the lack of proof. They do not generally convict on 'feels' for this.

I think this DOJ lawyer faces the real chance of the judge kicking this out with prejudice and referring the lawyer to the BAR disciplinary panel and being disbarred over this. I think what might save the lawyer is that the case is kicked even prior to the judge doing that, for this US Attorney not being legally appointed and thus the prosecution voided. Typically the DoJ could bring that back with a proper official (Todd Blanche started signing everything for Alina Habba in the same type ruling) but since Comey's case would be beyond the Statute of Limitations, it cannot be refiled.
Click to expand...
I think it's fitting that the last 2 people the trump thugs have gone after, Kimmel and Comey have exhibited more class and maturity. The contrast between them and the trump thug maniacs is telling!
 
I agree with the Israelis, you harm one of ours, we harm 10 of yours.

We have been promised more to come.

Good!

The far needs to suffer, huge legal fees and bankruptcy.

None of them have had near misses. One wonders how they would respond.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It was solid enough for a grand jury to indict him. That's more than most of the charges brought against people associated with Trump who were charged with something got.


I'd say based on federal win rates, Comey is going to prison.

They could try but the prosecution's counter is this went through the standard grand jury process with Trump out of the loop. I doubt the defense can come up with anything solid to counter that.
Click to expand...
You can indict a ham sandwich. Silly, Trump fired the prosecutors predecessor because he refused.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It was solid enough for a grand jury to indict him. That's more than most of the charges brought against people associated with Trump who were charged with something got.


I'd say based on federal win rates, Comey is going to prison.

They could try but the prosecution's counter is this went through the standard grand jury process with Trump out of the loop. I doubt the defense can come up with anything solid to counter that.
Click to expand...
The feds usually win, but prosecutors don’t usually get fired for refusing a case because it’s so weak.
 
Last edited:
Earl said:
I agree with the Israelis, you harm one of ours, we harm 10 of yours.

We have been promised more to come.

Good!

The far needs to suffer, huge legal fees and bankruptcy.

None of them have had near misses. One wonders how they would respond.
Click to expand...
Where is the video of Comey saying he authorized a leak?
 
FastLane said:
Tell me if you think the DOJ went after a former President in over 240 years without the authorization from the POTUS. Stop spinning.
Click to expand...

I get that evidence hasn't been important to MAGA since the 2020 election lie - but it's actually a thing.

I don't have to spin anything. I'm going by factual information, not assumption.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top