Do you think they have much on Comey?

Jarod said:
Considering prosecutors resigned rather than producing this case, does anyone believe they have good evidence?

What do you think are the chances of a conviction? We haven’t seen the evidence yet, but we will… any thoughts?

I’m wondering if the Defense will use Trumps stated desire to get his preceded “enemies” will be used as a part of Comey’s defense.
Click to expand...
Yeah, they have him on video, a no-brainer, not up for debate. That said, we get to have a trial and hear from lots of losers. We get to watch them turn on each other too. Will McCabe take the rap or confirm his previous testimony about Comey? Who will fold for immunity? Fun stuff, I know you'll all enjoy the show.
 
zymurgy said:
you wanted to bet that the indictment would not happen - and I reminded you at that point that you are a fucking liar and loser - and nobody trusts you

so admit how fucking wrong you were and we can go on
Click to expand...
An indictment is one thing, but a conviction is a complete other matter.
 
Tobytone said:
Yeah, they have him on video, a no-brainer, not up for debate. That said, we get to have a trial and hear from lots of losers. We get to watch them turn on each other too. Will McCabe take the rap or confirm his previous testimony about Comey? Who will fold for immunity? Fun stuff, I know you'll all enjoy the show.
Click to expand...
This post is a total no brainer.
 
Tobytone said:
Yeah, they have him on video, a no-brainer, not up for debate. That said, we get to have a trial and hear from lots of losers. We get to watch them turn on each other too. Will McCabe take the rap or confirm his previous testimony about Comey? Who will fold for immunity? Fun stuff, I know you'll all enjoy the show.
Click to expand...
I know he said he did not leak information, but is there evidence that is not true?

I have asked for a link about this but it seems nobody can produce.
I can't find any evidence of it on the internet.

Also, I understand there is some question if Comey was talking about the formal process of authorizing a leak, because he did not do that. I understand there is some evidence he gave the leaked information to a friend (he himself leaked it) but I do not see how that is authorizing a leak.
 
Jarod said:
But after he got away with not releasing the Epstein files, I do not see much that will get people to turn on him.
Click to expand...
Oooh! I don't think the "book is closed" on us getting a peak at some of the Epstein co-conpirators. Even some Repugnicans are pressuring Johnson to bring a vote to the floor on it.

"tick, tick"
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Team Trump says no one is above the law yet his supporters continue to believe the Orange Jesus is, indeed, above the law.

“No one is above the law. Today’s indictment reflects this Department of Justice’s commitment to holding those who abuse positions of power accountable for misleading the American people. We will follow the facts in this case,” Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on X in a post that did not name Comey but appeared to reference the charges.
Click to expand...
Yet they shut down the investigation on Homan and his $50,000 bag of cash.
 
domer76 said:
Yet they shut down the investigation on Homan and his $50,000 bag of cash.
Click to expand...
Because they are corrupt and will do anything the Orange Jesus asks of them. Sad.

a7a2zt.jpg
 
domer76 said:
I think it’s very possible when they really start looking at how weak their case is. So weak that the REAL prosecutors wouldn’t proceed.
Click to expand...
In any other administration, I'd agree, but this is Trump's administration and he dictates to both the DOJ and FBI. They'll do whatever he wants. If they don't, he'll fire them and find someone else who is willing to push this all the way to court.

Again, IMO, this is JAED. Maybe once the files are released, this might stop.
 
Jarod said:
I hope you are correct.
Click to expand...
www.independent.co.uk

MTG threatens to ‘say every damn name’ on House floor over Jeffrey Epstein clients

MAGA firebrand Marjorie Taylor Greene has joined forces with Democrats to pressure the Trump administration to release the entirety of the Epstein files
www.independent.co.uk www.independent.co.uk

"Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said the CIA, FBI and the Justice Department “holds the truth” on Jeffrey Epstein as she vowed to reveal “every damn name” of the purported high-powered clients of the late financier’s underage sex trafficking operation.

The Georgia representative, a Trump loyalist, dialed up the pressure on her own party by speaking at a news conference on Capitol Hill Wednesday, hosted by fellow rogue GOP Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California.

Greene has backed Massie’s “Epstein Files Transparency Bill,” along with fellow GOP congress members Lauren Boebert and Nancy Mace. They were joined by as many as 100 survivors of Epstein’s abuse at the event."
 
domer76 said:
I think it’s very possible when they really start looking at how weak their case is. So weak that the REAL prosecutors wouldn’t proceed.
Click to expand...
Trump would rage and fire them, I believe they were specifically hired because they said they would do it.
 
LurchAddams said:
www.independent.co.uk

MTG threatens to ‘say every damn name’ on House floor over Jeffrey Epstein clients

MAGA firebrand Marjorie Taylor Greene has joined forces with Democrats to pressure the Trump administration to release the entirety of the Epstein files
www.independent.co.uk www.independent.co.uk

"Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said the CIA, FBI and the Justice Department “holds the truth” on Jeffrey Epstein as she vowed to reveal “every damn name” of the purported high-powered clients of the late financier’s underage sex trafficking operation.

The Georgia representative, a Trump loyalist, dialed up the pressure on her own party by speaking at a news conference on Capitol Hill Wednesday, hosted by fellow rogue GOP Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California.

Greene has backed Massie’s “Epstein Files Transparency Bill,” along with fellow GOP congress members Lauren Boebert and Nancy Mace. They were joined by as many as 100 survivors of Epstein’s abuse at the event."
Click to expand...
Well, if I needed proof that Trump's name on the list being something that was incriminating was not true, MTG calling for its release does the trick.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
In any other administration, I'd agree, but this is Trump's administration and he dictates to both the DOJ and FBI. They'll do whatever he wants. If they don't, he'll fire them and find someone else who is willing to push this all the way to court.

Again, IMO, this is JAED. Maybe once the files are released, this might stop.
Click to expand...
Comey made him president in his first term. His announcement about finding hidden emails hurt Clinton badly. There were no hidden emails. His announcement was incorrect. But the damage was done. Trump was not grateful. Comey refused to swear allegiance to Trump instead of the Constitution. Trump would never allow that.
 
Damocles said:
Well, if I needed proof that Trump's name on the list being something that was incriminating was not true, MTG calling for its release does the trick.
Click to expand...
I think I agree, if I understood your meaning... If Trump is on the list in an incriminating way, MTG would not be callin for the release.

However, what if she does not know, has not seen it, and assumes that of course Trump is innocent. . .
 
LurchAddams said:
Your sentence is weird.
Click to expand...
Yah... convoluted.

MTG is HUGE Trump supporter. That she doesn't suddenly care about the release of the names tells me that Trump's name, if it is there, does not incriminate him. If I needed proof that Trump will not be incriminated by this release, MTG's wish to have the names out does the trick.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top