Do we understand yet why it's hard for assault victims to go public?

Clinton - the guy who I have called a slime more than a few times on here?

So let's have it, USF: do you believe Trump's accusers, or not?

But weren't we talking about voters in general and now you want to take it down to the specific individual!!

Odd how the person you "have called a slime more than a few times on here", you failed to include in your original rant!!

Well, maybe not so odd; HUH!!
 
But weren't we talking about voters in general and now you want to take it down to the specific individual!!

Odd how the person you "have called a slime more than a few times on here", you failed to include in your original rant!!

Well, maybe not so odd; HUH!!

I definitely understand why you're unable to answer the question.
 
Far as I know none of these women are filing lawsuits against Trump. They're just united in exposing his piggishness.

well yeah. They waited till the statue of limitations were up. Seriously though it is just logical for you to think that if a billionaire did that to you and you had 10 corroborating witnesses you would file a lawsuit. Tort cases have gotten settlement on far far far less evidence. You wouldnt have had to pay a dime in legal fees too as lawyers would offer their services to you for a cut of the loot. I understand its not a tort case but it would have gotten a settlement nonetheless.
 
Because we're in the "current events" forum?

Your massive hypocrisy is noted, as always.

So the Trump accusers are accepted by the left; because their accusations are recent; but when Clinton's accusers were current during his Presidency, they weren't accepted by the left even though they were current at that time!!

Weren't there current comments. current?
 
I find it difficult to beleive without corroboration - really without seeing an atty or anything of record - that everyone just decided to come out
whereas none beforehand.

Not impossible,but not the gospel truth either,
 
well yeah. They waited till the statue of limitations were up. Seriously though it is just logical for you to think that if a billionaire did that to you and you had 10 corroborating witnesses you would file a lawsuit. Tort cases have gotten settlement on far far far less evidence. You wouldnt have had to pay a dime in legal fees too as lawyers would offer their services to you for a cut of the loot. I understand its not a tort case but it would have gotten a settlement nonetheless.

I suspect collusion.
 
I find it difficult to beleive without corroboration - really without seeing an atty or anything of record - that everyone just decided to come out
whereas none beforehand.

Not impossible,but not the gospel truth either,

HEY, maybe one of them has clothing with a "groping" evidence on it!! :dunno:

:lol:
 
I find it difficult to beleive without corroboration - really without seeing an atty or anything of record - that everyone just decided to come out
whereas none beforehand.

Not impossible,but not the gospel truth either,

What they're saying is what Trump said he did to women, on tape.

I don't find it difficult to believe them, at all. Most of the stories are what Trump admitted to, exactly.

How many times have we seen it where one accuser comes out, and it gives many more the courage to do so?
 
I find it difficult to beleive without corroboration - really without seeing an atty or anything of record - that everyone just decided to come out
whereas none beforehand.

Not impossible,but not the gospel truth either,

hating on victims of crime makes you evil
 
What they're saying is what Trump said he did to women, on tape.

I don't find it difficult to believe them, at all. Most of the stories are what Trump admitted to, exactly.

How many times have we seen it where one accuser comes out, and it gives many more the courage to do so?

Which they waited until a tape was released and so it's no wonder that what their saying matches what the tape said.

:palm:
 
Back
Top