Do we NEED to find improper ballots or rigged machines to overturn election?

S

Stretch

New member
No.

Even if not one single vote was fraudulently presented, the bottom line is that certain states went against the US Constitution
rules that lawmakers take an oath to uphold. They lied in their oath and have now happily flaunted their disobedience.
The states which openly and purposefully took the job away from the state legislatures to direct the selection of electors have violated the law.
This can disqualify them. Very simple. Art. 2 Sec. 1 Clause 2.
 
Stretch said:
No.

Even if not one single vote was fraudulently presented, the bottom line is that certain states went against the US Constitution
rules that lawmakers take an oath to uphold. They lied in their oath and have now happily flaunted their disobedience.
The states which openly and purposefully took the job away from the state legislatures to direct the selection of electors have violated the law.
This can disqualify them. Very simple. Art. 2 Sec. 1 Clause 2.
Click to expand...

Its been over 2 months and you have yet to produce a single piece of evidence that will stand up in a court of law. I suppose you can document these lies that you speak of.
 
Stretch said:
No.

Even if not one single vote was fraudulently presented, the bottom line is that certain states went against the US Constitution
rules that lawmakers take an oath to uphold. They lied in their oath and have now happily flaunted their disobedience.
The states which openly and purposefully took the job away from the state legislatures to direct the selection of electors have violated the law.
This can disqualify them. Very simple. Art. 2 Sec. 1 Clause 2.
Click to expand...

60 judges have said fuck you
 
Stretch said:
No.

Even if not one single vote was fraudulently presented, the bottom line is that certain states went against the US Constitution
rules that lawmakers take an oath to uphold. They lied in their oath and have now happily flaunted their disobedience.
The states which openly and purposefully took the job away from the state legislatures to direct the selection of electors have violated the law.
This can disqualify them. Very simple. Art. 2 Sec. 1 Clause 2.
Click to expand...

Please show us some evidence that states violated Art. 2 Sec. 1 Clause 2?
 
Face it, you people just suck. The shittiest losers I've ever seen and all over someone that says things are against him because he's obviously mentally ill and doesn't have proper coping skills mentally. He said the election he won was rigged, he said debates were rigged, polls are rigged, the media is rigged against him somehow despite it giving him his rise up, questions are rigged. He's the person that loses the chess game and flips the board. I should feel bad for the poor saps that are conned but there's nothing I can give besides shaking my head and hoping you wake up. Right now you are like a wet dream for the boy who cried wolf. Trump cries wolf before the shepherd even has their sheep though. Maybe he thinks you're all sheep.:awesome:
 
Stretch said:
No.

Even if not one single vote was fraudulently presented, the bottom line is that certain states went against the US Constitution
rules that lawmakers take an oath to uphold. They lied in their oath and have now happily flaunted their disobedience.
The states which openly and purposefully took the job away from the state legislatures to direct the selection of electors have violated the law.
This can disqualify them. Very simple. Art. 2 Sec. 1 Clause 2.
Click to expand...

I'm sure you think nothing is needed to overturn an election.
 
Yes. DUH. Courts determine Constitutionality. You lost. EVERY SINGLE CASE. Because you are a loser.
 
And, there's always this in the good news from PA:cool:.........................


PENNSYLVANIA MEMBERS OF CONGRESS RELEASE STATEMENT REGARDING CERTIFICATION OF ELECTORS


WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Pennsylvania members of the U.S. House of Representatives including Congressman Dan Meuser (PA-9), Congressman Glenn ‘GT’ Thompson (PA-15), Congressman Mike Kelly (PA-16), Congressman Scott Perry (PA-10), Congressman Lloyd Smucker (PA-11), Congressman Guy Reschenthaler (PA-14), Congressman John Joyce (PA-13), and Congressman Fred Keller (PA-12) released the following joint statement:

“The United States Constitution is unambiguous in declaring that state legislatures are the entity with authority to set election procedure -

“Article 1, Section 4, Clause 1: The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof…

“Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2: Each state shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors…

“Unfortunately, the many unlawful actions undertaken by the Pennsylvania Governor's office, the Secretary of State, and what has been described as a rogue Pennsylvania Supreme Court exceeded and circumvented the state legislature's clear constitutional authority.

“The unlawful actions include, but are not limited to:

Accepting ballots past 8:00 pm on Election Day
Not properly requiring signatures to match those on mail-in ballots or requiring dates
Meanwhile, the matching of signatures was required at a polling site
Authorizing the curing of mail-in ballots with less than a 24-hour's notice
Only some counties were informed and adhered to this order leaving voters treated unequally from county to county
Authorizing the use of unsecure drop boxes, which is not permitted in statute
Prohibiting certified poll watchers overseeing the canvassing of ballots in Philadelphia

“These unlawful actions were taken without the authority or consent of the Pennsylvania state legislature. These are facts, and they are indisputable.

“Additionally, the Pennsylvania Attorney General did nothing with regard to these unlawful activities. Not one inquiry, no questioning, and certainly no investigations. Not to mention that hundreds, if not thousands, of affidavits outlining election complaints and potential fraud were documented, submitted, and ignored. The Pennsylvania election could be summed up as a free-for-all with no oversight and different standards applied throughout the Commonwealth. It is also very apparent that the unlawful actions described were concentrated in heavily populated, Democrat-led counties.

“By definition, such unlawful, unregulated, and inconsistent activities resulted in a highly questionable and inaccurate vote total. The scope of these inaccuracies cannot be known until the legal ballots are identified and counted, and the illegal ballots are disqualified. This has not been done.

“Therefore, the state's official certification of electors was based upon a flawed system and an inaccurate vote count. Thus, very possibly resulting in an erroneous certification.

“Until these unlawful practices are acknowledged and corrected, we cannot agree to support electors chosen based upon an inaccurate total vote count. The voters of Pennsylvania deserve integrity in the election process and equal protection under the law.

“This very unfortunate, volatile, and distressing situation is due to the lack of respect and regard for the law and the U.S. Constitution as well as the Pennsylvania State Constitution. Additionally, the failure of Pennsylvania's justice system to seek the truth, rather than stay silent, allowed these irregular, unlawful actions to create a high level of mistrust in the process as well as a potentially flawed outcome.

“If there is an American ideal that all citizens, regardless of party affiliation, can agree upon is that we must have election integrity. Election integrity is the only way to ensure trust in our elections and it is accomplished by adhering to our Constitution and the law.”

https://meuser.house.gov/media/pres...ess-release-statement-regarding-certification
 
floridafan said:
Its been over 2 months and you have yet to produce a single piece of evidence that will stand up in a court of law. I suppose you can document these lies that you speak of.
Click to expand...

The evidence exists. You can't wish it away. It does not require a court for it to exist.
 
Stretch said:
No.

Even if not one single vote was fraudulently presented, the bottom line is that certain states went against the US Constitution
rules that lawmakers take an oath to uphold. They lied in their oath and have now happily flaunted their disobedience.
The states which openly and purposefully took the job away from the state legislatures to direct the selection of electors have violated the law.
This can disqualify them. Very simple. Art. 2 Sec. 1 Clause 2.
Click to expand...

Article 2, Sec 1 says: "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct,"

No state changed the manner electors are appointed.

The changes were in the administration of the election which is covered under Article I, Section 4, Clause 1: The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top