Do Democrats Really Hate the Working Class? Of Course They Do, They Always Have, Now They're Saying it Loud and Proud. I've Got the Receipts.

[Nomad]

Pivot. You are EVADING the question ... out of obvious cowardice.

Utter nonsense.

Of course I answered his question.

Like all of taco's pansy brigade, you lowlife sleaze buckets spew invective everytime you open your bloviating, gas bag mouths.

But when you get a taste of your own medicine, you boo-hoo like toddlers.

Diapers soiled and crying for your rattles.

Anyone with a brain can understand the question works best the other way...

Why should WE support YOU assholes?

I am not suggesting this. I am expressly stating this.

And as with everything else you expressly state, the smell of bullshit permeates the atmosphere thousands of feet vertically and for a radius of a thousand miles.

You are quibbling over minutia, and you are incorrect to boot. GTFOH, loser.

So you are trying to say that if taco's EO is still not carried out by the time he leaves office, as might be the case, it's just minutiae?

Sounds to me like you were just looking for an excuse to employ the word "minutiae" thinking it makes you sound more erudite than you actually are.

Which is not very much.

Nope. Trump is the expert, not your Marxist partisan HATERS of humanity.

Now you're not even trying to appear serious.

You just shot any lame excuse for an argument you might have been cobbling together, right in the foot.

You've turned your argument from lame to permanently crippled.

 

[IBDaMann]

[EVASION omitted]

Your king is tipped. Get back to me when something changes and you can answer gfm7175's question.

 

[Nomad]

Your king is tipped. Get back to me when something changes and you can answer gfm7175's question.

Your filthy, pathetic, chicken taco lies are obvious and exposed for all to see.

Get back to me when you advance to a more post adolescent phase.

 

[IBDaMann]

Your filthy, pathetic, chicken taco lies are obvious and exposed for all to see.

You didn't say a thing here. You already forfeited; you don't need to throw up any more smokescreens.

Get back to me when you advance to a more post adolescent phase.

What constitutes more post-adolescent than standard post-adolescence?

 

[Nomad]

You didn't say a thing here. You already forfeited; you don't need to throw up any more smokescreens.

Oh look, the old right-wing blowhard fake victory proclamation.

Didn't see that coming ...

What constitutes more post-adolescent than standard post-adolescence?

Maybe if you ever attain it someday, you'll understand.

Keep trying.

 

[IBDaMann]

Maybe if you ever attain it someday, you'll understand.

So you once again used a term you don't understand. I figured this was the case.

 

[Nomad]

So you once again used a term I don't understand. I figured this was the case.

Get yourself a vocabulary book and study it.

Maybe it will help you look like less of a dumbass.

Probably not, but it's worth a try.

 

[EdwinA]

A reminder that the Democrats implemented the 'Super Delegate Rule' precisely to disenfranchise those uppity proles. The Watergate Babies also got rid of Wright Patman and several others, for their 'evil populist positions'.

 

[IBDaMann]

Get yourself a vocabulary book and study it.

So, you still don't know, but now you are trying to blame me for your inability to look it up. Great.

 

[Nomad]

So, you still don't know, but now you are trying to blame me for your inability to look it up. Great.

No, I blame you for being a self aggrandizing, thinly veiled word game playing little punk, who tries to come across as being a lot smarter than he is, and as such, runs his big, fat obnoxious mouth a lot while never actually saying anything of value or worth.

I know that was a complex set of concepts for a dullard like you to digest, but take your time and read it over again several times until maybe you'll eventually digest it all.

Best of luck with that.

 

[IBDaMann]

No, I blame you for being a [petty name-calling commensurate with his maturity level omitted]

OK. Great. You are going to blame me. Exactly how am I an injury to you?

Best of luck with that.

I'm not the one who needs any luck. I'm not trying to blame anyone for being an injury to me.

 

[Nomad]

OK. Great. You are going to blame me.

You are only to blame for what you are and how you conduct yourself on a public forum.

Exactly how am I an injury to you?

You aren't. You're only injuring your own credibility, if you ever even had any.

I'm not the one who needs any luck. I'm not trying to blame anyone for being an injury to me.

Go play your childish little word games with someone else, junior.

You aren't going to bamboozle me or anyone else with your juvenile nonsense.

You are nowhere near that clever.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Nope.

Nope. A treaty is an agreement between two nations. A tariff requires no such agreement.

However, tariffs may be agreed between two nations through a treaty, which affects tariffs in both directions.

a tariff is an impelemation detail of such an agreement.

don't be daft, man.

 

[Into the Night]

Didn't even read one word of that shit salad.

You obviously did, liar.

 

[Into the Night]

Oh look, the old right-wing blowhard fake victory proclamation.

Fallacy fallacy. You are continuing to evade. Why are you working so hard at evading?

 

[Into the Night]

Get yourself a vocabulary book and study it.

His vocabulary is fine. You just have trouble with English.

 

[Into the Night]

a tariff is an impelemation detail of such an agreement.

don't be daft, man.

Nope. A tariff is not a treaty. Redefinition fallacy.
A tariff is a tax.

 

[Nordberg]

A reminder that the Democrats implemented the 'Super Delegate Rule' precisely to disenfranchise those uppity proles. The Watergate Babies also got rid of Wright Patman and several others, for their 'evil populist positions'.

That is party politics. Itt has been changed because of blowback from other Dems.

 

[Nordberg]

I don’t just claim, I know they do, and I served up a prime example from one of your fellow lefty drones. Your problem? You think holding back cash from the world’s most wasteful, corrupt, inefficient institution means robbing the needy, when really it’s just stopping the enrichment of the wrong people. Taxes transfer wealth, siphoning money from those who earn it to wherever the government feels like blowing it.

Tax cuts? They let hardworking people keep more of their own money to spend as they choose. You’re the clueless one. You equate any slowdown in spending growth with yanking critical aid, never bothering to ask how much we’re spending or where the hell it’s going. How about some specifics, exactly who is losing what? Not what your Hivemaster tell you could happen, but what exactly are people losing. Show the receipts, you won't because that takes a little work and you'd rather just parrot bullshit.

To you and your ilk, the price tag’s irrelevant as long as you can vilify those “greedy rich” to foot the bill and think you've done something about the problem but bitching about it. Meanwhile, you ignore the fraud, waste, and outright theft that fattens the wallets of the con artists who’ve got you parroting their talking points like a loyal little soldier. Wake up and smell the scam, dumbass.

The workers earn the money. The owners get rich off labor. The arrogant, wealthy make nothing if workers walk off the job.

 

[Tobytone]

The workers earn the money. The owners get rich off labor. The arrogant, wealthy make nothing if workers walk off the job.

The workers make the wages they agreed to. If the owner is lucky and the consumers like their product and agree to buy it for enough money to pay the wages, the expenses plus a profit, and everything works well enough to repeat over and over without disaster, the owner might get rich.

If the workers walk off, the nice person that decided to create jobs for those that don't have the desire, or the ambition, or brains to do the same, decides to just invest in the market because it's too much of a pain in the ass dealing with dumbass ignorant losers like you, and they still get rich, but the workers don't have a job to walk off again.

That's reality. Your dumbass comment is from a failed ideological fantasy written by a disgusting, soap-dodging, lazy, wife beating loser that lived off his wife's inheritance and then borrowed money from his family he never paid back, and his gullible 'buddy' Engels, all to write a recipe for fools that killed at least a hundred million innocent people, of course, mostly the ones he proposed to help. Here we are, still to this day, morons like you saying the same completely ignorant absurd statements like you just did. Surprising? LOL Not at all, it's just what libtard drones do.