DNI disputes wth CIA regarding Russia hack assessment

NOVA said:
Reasonable question....what about the other agency's?....we've only heard from three, the CIA, ODNI and FBI...who seem to have disagreements on the degree of actual proof and motive of the 'suspected' party being accussed.

CTIIC is the newest of four multi-agency intelligence centers under the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). Cyber Threat Intelligence Integration Center and his assessment , reported by Reuters was that while the ODNI does not dispute the CIA’s general analysis on Russia hacking, the office is not convinced of the evidence that Moscow sought specifically to help Trump defeat Democratic opponent Clinton.

The FBI questions the accused party.
The ODNI questions the motive
The CIA has no solid proof of either.

Its still a guessing game with no consensus....

The voters heard the truth from Wikileaks...not even one DNC email was contested as not being factual, so the source of the truth is
irrelevant to me and probably is to most people....The message was more important than the messenger....
Click to expand...
thanks for that info..CTIIC huh? Yes it's a guessing game but the substantial "hacking the election to aid Trump" is meaningless
without WIKIleaks. It's a tempest in a teapot to stir up partisan stupidity and anti-Russian hysteria
 
WillReadmore said:
You're confused on a couple points here.

Comey made statements about Clinton's Sec State email - not the DNC.

One doesn't always know if one is hacked, so one can certainly think one is not being hacked and then find out later that there was hacking going on.


Finally, Russia hacking elements of our democracy is a national security issue and a direct assault on our democracy.

Pitching that as "sour grapes" is not just stupid - it is seriously anti-American.
Click to expand...

Well, it could be either but in IHA's case he is too stupid to realise how anti-American it is.
 
anatta said:
thanks for that info..CTIIC huh? Yes it's a guessing game but the substantial "hacking the election to aid Trump" is meaningless
without WIKIleaks. It's a tempest in a teapot to stir up partisan stupidity and anti-Russian hysteria
Click to expand...

No it isn't you apologist/minimalist.
It is an election hacked by Russia.
It should be your worst nightmare if Trump wasn't ball deep up your ass.
 
Rune said:
No it isn't you apologist/minimalist.
It is an election hacked by Russia.
It should be your worst nightmare if Trump wasn't ball deep up your ass.
Click to expand...
your ignorance is boundless -no one is saying "Russia hacked the election"
 
Death Watch said:
It is sour grapes. States hacking states is nothing new. Are you saying we don't do it?

Get off your high fucking horse.

Yeah the Russians wanted to learn about Podestas risotto. If they really wanted to hurt that cunt Hillary, Wiki would have released them during the primary. It highlights more how the democrat party screwed Bernie.

All along the lefties said the Podesta emails had no effect. But now that the cunt lost you are all of a sudden cold warriors.

Spare me your feigned indignation.
Click to expand...
Your disgusting language demonstrates you've got nothing.

You couldn't even manage to read my post!!
 
Yaya said:
If Trump stuff was hacked by Russia, dems would be singing the Russian national anthem.
Click to expand...

Ain't that the truth lol.

What would they hope to find that people didn't already know? That extra mistress Trump kept hid from the paparazzi?

Like that would budge the needle.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top