Is this the 'Apple and Oranges' game.....???Didn't Romney have an undocumented housekeeper, or gardener that he had to fire in order to run for POTUS?
Is this the 'Apple and Oranges' game.....???Didn't Romney have an undocumented housekeeper, or gardener that he had to fire in order to run for POTUS?
Probably? So you're guessing?
Cause I'm not.
probably not, but don't let that stop you from posting it.......
oh gosh, the liberals believe he lied because they assume the people who worked for his landscape service were undocumented.......Yes he did.
![]()
![]()
"I don't think I've ever hired an illegal in my life."
— Mitt Romney on Tuesday, October 18th, 2011 in a Republican presidential primary debate
When Romney said he "did not" have illegal immigrants working for him, we rated his statement Mostly False, given the credible evidence that undocumented lawn care laborers from Guatemala worked at his home for years, and his careful statements about his knowledge of their status.
When Romney said he "did not" have illegal immigrants working for him, we rated his statement Mostly False, given the credible evidence that undocumented lawn care laborers from Guatemala worked at his home for years, and his careful statements about his knowledge of their status.
Of course it's relevant. The story is about undocumented workers, and the fact that the Right only cares about the issue when they can ignore their own support of same.
Yes he did.
![]()
![]()
"I don't think I've ever hired an illegal in my life."
— Mitt Romney on Tuesday, October 18th, 2011 in a Republican presidential primary debate
When Romney said he "did not" have illegal immigrants working for him, we rated his statement Mostly False, given the credible evidence that undocumented lawn care laborers from Guatemala worked at his home for years, and his careful statements about his knowledge of their status.
When Romney said he "did not" have illegal immigrants working for him, we rated his statement Mostly False, given the credible evidence that undocumented lawn care laborers from Guatemala worked at his home for years, and his careful statements about his knowledge of their status.
oh gosh, the liberals believe he lied because they assume the people who worked for his landscape service were undocumented.......
I like you, but stop letting them play the deflection game
Care to respond with facts, Moot, or just more of your liberal parrot points?
My prediction- more of the same from you, or you simply run away and pretend that you were never challenged.
Was this sub contracted work?
http://toprightnews.com/dnc-just-broke-federal-law-at-convention-parades-illegal-aliens-onstage/
It seems the law doesn't apply to the democrats, they are pining to be the new monarchy!
But it doesn't matter here
but she remains in the country perfectly legally.
ah, of course....another "what difference does it make"........
as I recall the Dream Act didn't pass.....therefore she is not here legally.....
"In the case of Francisca Sanchez, the rhetoric states that she lives in the United States illegally and that the DNC defied federal law in order to bring her on stage. However, it's not immediately clear whether she is in the process of appealing the order (which would, legally, grant her a stay until a decision has been made one way or another) or if she has other extenuating circumstances. But it doesn't matter here, because the DNC did not provably harbor or transport her, and they certainly did not shield her — in fact, by putting her on a stage at a televised event with an international audience and using her real name, the Democratic National Convention did the exact opposite of "shield" her. It's also worth noting that the codes relating to "improper entry by alien" classify it as a civil violation with civil penalties, not a criminal one.
The case of Astrid Silva, the second speaker, is far simpler: she came to the United States when she was four years old, making her what is popularly called a DREAMer: those who grew up in the U.S. but were born elsewhere. She then sought relief under the DACA program. DREAMers are named after the DREAM Act (Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors, which is intended to offer relief to those who came to the United States as children.) The DREAM Act has repeatedly failed to pass, but the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) has offered opportunities, albeit temporarily, for those who were born in one country but grew up in the United States and are completely culturally American. (DAPA is part of an expansion of DACA.)
In other words, Silva may have come to the United States without papers, but she remains in the country perfectly legally.
http://www.snopes.com/2016/07/27/dnc-breaks-federal-laws/
"She then sought relief under the DACA program. ...the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) has offered opportunities, albeit temporarily, for those who were born in one country but grew up in the United States and are completely culturally American. (DAPA is part of an expansion of DACA.)"
Using snopes does not help your cause. Facts are, they are here illegally are in violation of immigration laws and should be deported, in fact Sanchez had received deportation papers.
Snopes just collects the info and links to the facts behind the statements.
Snopes just collects the info and links to the facts behind the statements. I don't suppose you've ever clicked on the embedded links or you wouldn't have made this comment.
http://toprightnews.com/dnc-just-broke-federal-law-at-convention-parades-illegal-aliens-onstage/
It seems the law doesn't apply to the democrats, they are pining to be the new monarchy!