Dixie ignoring my illistrative analogy!

Dixie said:
Yes, it is true. Chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons are all designed and intended to produce mass destruction, either in the form of destroying human life or property. To argue otherwise, is sheer idiocy.
Click to expand...

I agree that was the intent... that does not make them WMD's.
 
WERE WMD FOUND IN IRAQ OR NOT? YOu give different answers on differnt days....
 
Jarod said:
You say so many different things I cant keep em stright...

WE did or did not find wmd in Iraq?


DIXIE... "There was no LIE told, we may or MAY NOT have had faulty intelligence, there are MANY explanations for why WMD's weren't found in Iraq TWO FUCKING YEARS after our CIA said they were there. In fact, most people who are knowledgeable about this, believe they went to Syria."
Click to expand...

Jarhead, you chortled something about me still believing Saddam had WMDs, and I posted a picture of some of the 80k liters the UNSCOM team tagged and documented in 1996. So the question as to whether he had WMDs has been answered, yes he did have them. You have offered nothing to refute this, and you really can't, it defies logic. You would have to contradict reams of UNSCOM reports on their inspections, and totally ignore the physical evidence right in front of your face. Of course, with your stupid ass, anything is possible I suppose.
 
Dixie said:
Yes it does, stupid! WMD stands for WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION! If a thing is a weapon and it's intent is mass destruction, how could it fucking be anything else?

What a goddamn moron!
Click to expand...

The intent when you make something does not make it so....

The maker may have intended to make a wmd, he might even have made a wmd, that does not make the thing he made a wmd 20 years later...
 
If Bush intended to create a good economy, does that mean we have a good economy?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top