Director of the FBI calls Rump out on lies!

Dick from the Internet said:
Who suggested they withheld evidence? Yes, if they failed to get a warrant then it was because the evidence was too "thin" or it could be they just failed to narrow it to a specific foreign target. But that does not mean there was no evidence.
Click to expand...

There is no evidence to support the asinine FAKE media narrative that Trumps campaign colluded with the Russians and that it was the Russians who helped to defeat Clinton.

But when you are a brain dead leftist asshole on steroids, anything is plausible EXCEPT the idea that the Obama administration was violating the rule of law by not only listening in to Trump servers, but leaking the resulting information in a moronic effort to diminish the USA and the office of the President.

Let's face it; the media temper tantrum over Trump is leading many Americans to tune them out for good because they no longer pretend to be objective or to care about being the nation's watchdog when Democrats are in charge.

Dunce.
 
Jarod said:
desperate attempt to change the subject.
Click to expand...

The desperation belongs to the left and their FAKE media allies trying to pretend that there is anything remotely honest about their attempts to diminish America and the office of the President.

But we get it; you lying leftist hypocrites were embarrassed by your moronic predictions of a Hillary landslide and now attempt to double down on your lunacy by making yourselves look even more stupid trying to engage in Cold War tactics and pretend this is Watergate in nature.

It's really stupid, pathetic, predictable and repugnant.
 
Althea said:
The case described, at first shows that trump has business dealings with Russian banks. Communications occurred on a daily basis, but the exact communications could not be discerned. Some say it was a glitch in a mass email system trump used to hawk his hotels. For whatever reason, Alpha bank was repeatedly trying to communicate with trump's email system.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...r-a-trump-russia-link/?utm_term=.c9ce43ae3a6e
Click to expand...

There is no case unless you're a willful idiot.
 
Althea said:
I don't believe any U.S banks are stupid enough to loan trump money. He has mortgages with numerous overseas banks. I'm sure Russia is one of them.
Click to expand...

Only in leftist dumbfuck land can one suggest that someone whose company is worth billions can't get a back loan.

No wonder you vote Democrat; you're an idiot on steroids. :rofl2:

1069287732.gif
 
Pocahontas said:
1) The Tweets are not simply counterproductive; they are fucking retarded.
2) What relationship would you like to see with a nation that feeds its reporters luminous poison, annexes sovereign lands, and bombs UN aid workers for thrills?
Click to expand...

what does realpolitik say about it?
(and I'd be careful about comparing Russia's and our wanton destruction of nations)

do you think adding more and more weaponry either deters Putin or makes Europe more stable?
Would it not be more productive to end NATO expansionism?
 
Thing1 said:
Yeah - that seemed like a pretty big leap.

We have some true artisans of spin on this board.
Click to expand...

Irony; liberal idiots who think there is something to the FAKE claims about Trump colluding with Russians but then lampoon the idea that the Obama Administration is playing politics.

No wonder your predictions are laughably stupid and never right. Dunce.
 
Jarod said:
The FBI is a division of the Justice Department. He wanted to give higher ups the chance to do the right thing, they did not. Now the ball is in his court, what will he do? I know in the last few weeks of hte campaign what he chose regarding HRC>
Click to expand...

:rofl2:
1069287732.gif
 
Jarod said:
Many possibilities here.

Maybe they found the evidence more recently than October...
Maybe they found the evidence in a different way than by using FISA wiretaps.
Maybe they did legitimately Tap the Campaign's phones.
Maybe they are not commenting because they don't comment on open investigations.
Maybe they have some evidence, but not enough to convict and are giving them rope.
Many more options.
Click to expand...

:rofl2:

1069287732.gif
 
Pocahontas said:
1) The Tweets are not simply counterproductive; they are fucking retarded.
Click to expand...

Yes that may be true; but it is fun watching the brain dead left's collective heads explode every time he sends one out.

Pocahontas said:
2) What relationship would you like to see with a nation that feeds its reporters luminous poison, annexes sovereign lands, and bombs UN aid workers for thrills?
Click to expand...

There you go with that shrill, yet stupid, anti-America bullshit again. You're quite full of it.
 
tsuke said:
"WIRETAPPED DATA USED IN INQUIRY OF TRUMP AIDES"

NYT headline on Jan 20 :P
Click to expand...

Irony for the leftist dumbasses:

More Fake News…
The front page of The New York Times way back on January 20, 2017…“Wiretapped Data Used in Inquiry of Trump Aides”

But Two months later they are trashing their own reports! Now the NY Times is reporting there is no evidence of a wiretap. No wonder nobody trusts them!
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...ine-wiretapped-data-used-inquiry-trump-aides/
 
Dick from the Internet said:
Again, it could be that the court rejected it for not being narrow enough not for lack of evidence. That's what the BBC, which at this point is the only credible source for the claim that the court was even approached, said was the reason the first requests were denied.
Click to expand...

So the NYT was lying to the American sheeple back in January?

Dunce.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top