So? The majority are done with an AR. Both handguns and AR's need limits.
DId the Maine shooter have the right to bear an AR-15?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
So? The majority are done with an AR. Both handguns and AR's need limits.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
So YOU were caught just making shit up again.
Enforcement of existing laws already on the books would help. But you refuse to do that because it is mostly Blacks being killed and white libs want that.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
But you were dead wrong about that. It was sponsored by a Democrat and voted for by a Democrat House and bipartisan Senate, of which Joe Biden and Lawton Chiles were Democrats
in and both voted for it.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/97th-congress/house-bill/3982/all-actions?q={"action-by":"Senate"}
So YOU were caught just making shit up again.
Enforcement of existing laws already on the books would help. But you refuse to do that because it is mostly Blacks being killed and white libs want that.
Westforth Sports in Gary, Indiana remains the third largest FFL supplier of crime guns into Chicago from 2013-2016. Cabela's in Hammond, Indiana has moved up to the fourth largest source dealer for crime guns over the past four years, just ahead of Shore Galleries in northern Cook County.
https://www.chicago.gov/content/dam... Room/Press Releases/2017/October/GTR2017.pdf
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
NO, they do not need more limits. There are plenty of laws already on the books. But you keep ignoring that reality.
About 97% of firearm deaths are caused by handguns. But you don't care.
But you were dead wrong about that. It was sponsored by a Democrat and voted for by a Democrat House and bipartisan Senate, of which Joe Biden and Lawton Chiles were Democrats
in and both voted for it.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/97th-congress/house-bill/3982/all-actions?q={"action-by":"Senate"}
Deferent bill
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
We already label them with warnings and safety instructions.
What did we ban besides DDT? ... which was banned for environmental reasons.
Women can still buy rat poison and use it to kill their husbands.
They banned DDT, and now there's bedbugs in America again. Derp!
NO, they do not need more limits. There are plenty of laws already on the books. But you keep ignoring that reality.
About 97% of firearm deaths are caused by handguns. But you don't care.
I think we need to restrict handgun access.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
NOT a different (it's spelled "different") bill, fucktard.
https://www.aging.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/reports/rpt681.pdf
What bills say they are and what they do are often not the same thing.
Section 12, alleged lawyer boy with no reading comprehension or spelling skills.
https://www.congress.gov/search?q={"source":"legislation","search":"cite:PL97-35"}
Last edited:
Trumpet
Verified User
Speaking about getting a job, do you have any plans to get one?????????????????????
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
There is a right to bear arms. There is also a right to free speech. The question here is, Did his speech prior to this shooting reach a point where it was legally sufficient that his firearms could be confiscated on the basis of that speech? I'm sure that Maine had a process in place to determine and answer that question, but with our courts being the slow, ponderous, system they are it could, and likely would, have taken months for the courts to act allowing law enforcement to confiscate his firearms if found to be necessary.
So, no Rights aren't absolute. There are limits to them. The problem is figuring out where those limits lie in cases where there are 'shades of grey' rather than straightforward black and white.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
I think you need an airboat ride out into the Everglades, but that's just my opinion.
To be dropped off and given the choice to have a gun or not.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
Be specific. You mean ban law abiding Black Americans from owning firearms.
No, is that specific enough.
I think you need an airboat ride out into the Everglades, but that's just my opinion.
I enjoy that, but I haven't done it in a while. I should go again.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
2016? ... that's ancient history.
What are number 1 and 2 sources? stolen? Cartels?
Straw gun purchases are illegal. Why will you NOT advocate for enforcing the laws already on the books?
You are myopic, focusing only the guns used in 1% of firearm deaths. Why?
Last edited:
SmarterthanYou
rebel
with the trace of those guns, were the original buyers, who had to be Indiana citizens, charged?
TOP
Retired Teacher
You weren't specific at all...
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
No, it is deflection and a lie.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/w...ve-registered-their-newly-banned-guns-so-far/
According to Illinois State Police data, 2,415,481 gun owners call the Land o’ Lincoln home. Earlier this year, Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed the so-called Protect Illinois Communities Act into law which banned the most many of the most popular guns used for self-defense. Under the law, existing owners of these now verboten firearms must register their guns by January 1, 2024 or face felony charges.
Four weeks into the gun registration window, exactly 2430 of those FOID holders have registered their guns, accessories, or .50 caliber firearms. That works out to .1006%, or about one in a thousand.
What’s even more remarkable is the number of FOID holders choosing to comply has fallen with each passing week.
In other words, Illinois gun owners have declined to participate in the state’s gun ban.