cancel2 2022
Canceled
Intriguing this, is this true?
http://checkyourfact.com/2019/01/03...mocrats-2013-bill-46-billion-border-security/
http://checkyourfact.com/2019/01/03...mocrats-2013-bill-46-billion-border-security/
: DID ‘EVERY SENATE DEMOCRAT’ VOTE IN 2013 FOR $46 BILLION IN BORDER SECURITY FUNDING
- Thread starter cancel2 2022
- Start date
Centerleftfl
Verified User
Just what part of BORDER SECURITY versus a WALL do you no understand?
Centerleftfl
Verified User
“We do not stand by those assertions that the Russian government makes,” Nauert said, acknowledging that the
interrogation of U.S. officials “would be a grave concern to our former colleagues here.”
interrogation of U.S. officials “would be a grave concern to our former colleagues here.”
Outrage erupts over Trump-Putin ‘conversation’ about letting Russia interrogate ex-U.S. diplomat Michael McFaul
By Samantha Schmidt
July 19, 2018
Follow Thursday’s updates here: White House: Trump opposes Putin’s request to interview current and former American officials
At this week’s summit in Helsinki, Russian President Vladimir Putin proposed what President Trump described as an “incredible offer” — the Kremlin would give special counsel Robert S. Mueller III access to interviews with Russians who were indicted after they allegedly hacked Democrats in 2016. In return, Russia would be allowed to question certain U.S. officials it suspects of interfering in Russian affairs.
One of those U.S. officials is a former U.S. ambassador to Moscow, Michael McFaul, a nemesis of the Kremlin because of his criticisms of Russia’s human rights record.
On Wednesday, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders declined to rule out the Kremlin’s request to question McFaul and other Americans. Asked during the daily press briefing whether Trump is open to the idea of having McFaul questioned by Russia, Sanders said President Trump is “going to meet with his team” to discuss the offer...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-outrage-astonishment/?utm_term=.f5eaeff04dac
Getin the ring
Verified User
that's a question for you nut-bags
suppose you lay out for us in detail what you think border security "without the wall" looks
like
so we can laugh at you
(((crickets)))
It looks like approximately 12 million illegal residents infesting blue states. Illegals get counted in the Census, swelling the population of border states like California.
DEMOCRATS benefit politically through increased shares in federal spending, additional representation in the House, and additional electoral votes. They also likely garner millions of illegal votes by non-citizens eager to secure benefits for themselves, their relatives who are planning to sneak in, and their spawn.
That's why DEMOCRATS won't support a border security plan that actually secures the border. They know a partial fence is easy to walk around or scale.
Obama actually spoke in favor.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4589456/obama-sobre-secure-fence-act-2006
Getin the ring
Verified User
what happened to centerleft?
(((crickets))))
I thought he was going to explain to us what border security without a wall would look like.
Anybody? (((crickets)))
that's why we don't listen to you nut-bags, you have no solutions
(((crickets))))
I thought he was going to explain to us what border security without a wall would look like.
Anybody? (((crickets)))
that's why we don't listen to you nut-bags, you have no solutions
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
there is already a path to citizenship for everyone here legally.......
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Partisan prick on steroids.
Border security and a wall or two different things. Border security is necessary a wall is moronic. this is been explained to you before so you don't need to keep being stupid.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Get stuffed, senile old git!!
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
Explain it to us in detail.
How would Democrats secure the border so that not one illegal immigrant gets across?