Did Big Chief Warren screw over Mass voters?

Have you ever known someone to form an exploratory committed who isn't running? I have always laughed at the whole "exploratory committee" ruse that politicians play.

Fuck an exploratory committee, if Fauxcahontas wants to run let her run. I think she would be the candidate that would give Trump the hardest time. I sure hope the democrats don't nominate her.

Announcing an exploratory committee gets free media attention and it is a legal thing for campaign finance laws. If a candidate does it early they are hoping it may cause others not to announce.
 
I don't really care as long as it's not hrc. I'll just be watching the show as usual. I haven't voted for a winner since 1992. I'd be fine with Pocahontas I guess. I'd prefer Rand Paul but no chance there.

I usually vote 'Third Party'.
 
She just ran for re-election as a US Senator and now she announces she is running for President

Personally out of all the names thrown out there as potential candidates for the democrat party she is the one I could vote for.

I mean the way she swills a beer really spoke to me

BIG CHIEF WARREN 2020

I don't think so. She can always have a special election in the case she becomes president. A lot of people on both the left and right run for president while having another office. Also voters in her state may think that she will benefit them better as president than as Senator, and having her resign is too much of a risk in case she loses. I'm looking forward to hear more about her policy proposals.
 
If nothing else it will be entertaining. So far nobody has figured out how to counter Trump. I'm sure there are candidates burning the late night candle brainstorming how to beat him.

I think she'd stand up for herself much better than Hillary did. The sexists would still call her a shrew for doing so but Dems need to stop trying to please people they'll never reach anyway.
 
I usually vote 'Third Party'.

I voted for Johnson last go round. The moonbats on this board somehow can't distinguish the difference between "Trump" and "Johnson".

For their part, the Democrats appeal to voters with a three-pronged message:

PRONG ONE: The Democrats are the party of fairness, diversity and inclusion.

PRONG TWO: Anybody who disagrees with the Democrats about anything is Hitler.

PRONG THREE: But more racist.
 
The moonbats here don't believe I voted for Johnson. Don't be like them.

I believe you voted for Johnson

I don’t believe that Jack voted “third party”. He won’t name names. That tells me he is lying

Plus libtards like Jack think it is fashionable to say they vote “third party” or are “independent”. But he is a sheep like the rest of the leftists here. He tows the democrat party line verbatim never deviating from their talking points
 
I believe you voted for Johnson

I don’t believe that Jack voted “third party”. He won’t name names. That tells me he is lying

Plus libtards like Jack think it is fashionable to say they vote “third party” or are “independent”. But he is a sheep like the rest of the leftists here. He tows the democrat party line verbatim never deviating from their talking points
Dunno. I don't really follow him.
 
They stood Hillbag up against a traffic bollard. That was funny.

They claimed she was "the most qualified' too, didn't they?

zr3zm5ytaykx.gif
 
Back
Top