$62.00 didn't give any coverage at all. To even consider that a policy, is disingenuous. For $180./mo, the coverage is 3x better.
Shouldn't that decision be made by the individual concerned?
$62.00 didn't give any coverage at all. To even consider that a policy, is disingenuous. For $180./mo, the coverage is 3x better.
http://articles.latimes.com/1986-10-...onal-committee
In an Aug. 13 memo the court made public Friday, Kris Wolfe, the Republican National Committee Midwest political director, wrote Lanny Griffith, the committee's Southern political director, and said of the Louisiana campaigning:
"I know this race is really important to you. I would guess that this program will eliminate at least 60-80,000 POolks from the rolls. . . . If it's a close race . . . which I'm assuming it is, this could keep the black vote down considerably."
Unseals Document
She said in the memorandum that the program had been approved by Gregory Graves, deputy political director of the National Republican Senatorial Committee.The document, called Exhibit 13, was unsealed by U.S. District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise when lawyers for the Democratic National Committee said it was needed to question Wolfe
right from the top of the party
this proves its the republicans who are the shit bags
A retarded coward? Unusual but I do understand how intimidating my intellect can be to an ignorant conservatard such as yourself.Who needs an IQ test to see what a complete utter moronic dullard you are? All we have to do is read your incredibly stupid posts and see who is thanking you.
Are you really this stupid, or do you have to work at it. I’m going with the former; now run along you lying asshat; your dullard attempts to spam this thread with your typical clueless off topic nonsense are those of an idiot; and they say one should never argue with idiots, they just try to drag you down to their low level, then beat you with experience.
Do yourself a favor and put me on ignore as you falsely claimed earlier and stop trying to remove all doubt about what a dullard asshat you really are. Have a toke in your double wide with your redneck dipshit roomate Dupe. Thinking is not your forte’.
"page not found". Another epic failure by the forums prolific leftist asshat and liar.
Yup teabagger is right, my premium is going up 6 dollars a month on 15,000 a year. Not sure they would understand percentage increase
the White House and the US Department of Health and Human Services announced that the cost for health insurance that uninsured individuals are required to buy under the Affordable Healthcare Act would average 16 percent less than before here in Pennsylvania.
That comparison, however, was made against what the Congressional Budget Office calculated rates might look like in 2016, not against the actual plans available prior to Oct.1 when enrollment began.
A rough comparison between those earlier 2013 plans and the ACA rates, made by the Manhattan Institute using the HHS data, yielded a different result with statewide premium rates for a 27-year-old male at a 279-percent increase in Nebraska. In this analysis, the average increase in Pennsylvania is 63 percent.
Pennsylvania is divided into nine Rating Areas. Pittsburgh is in Area 4.
Using the HHS rate calculator at http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/reports/2013/MarketplacePremiums/datasheet_home.cfm, one can see that in Zone 4, there are four providers offering a total of 41 plans: five Catastrophic, eight Bronze, 13 Silver, 14 Gold and one Platinum. You can plug in your age and find the monthly premium costs for least expensive policy in all categories.
For instance, a 27-year-old will pay monthly premiums of $103.69 for the cheapest Catastrophic plan, $119.19 for Bronze, $133.83 for Silver and $169 for Gold.
For a 40-year-old the costs range from $126.45 for Catastrophic, $145.35 for Bronze, $163.20 for Silver, and $206.09 for Gold.
For a 64-year-old, the monthly cost of the cheapest Catastrophic policy is $296.82, Bronze is $341.19, Silver is $383.10, and Gold is $483.78. If you lived in Area 8, that same Gold policy would cost $715.83 per month.
These policies also have deductibles and co-pays, which generally vary inversely with the level of coverage.
http://www.newpittsburghcourieronline.com/index.php/featured-news/metro/17948-here-s-what-obamacare-will-cost-you
Okay, I got a pay stub for comparison purposes. I have $248.93 out of every paycheck, $497.86/mo. Your chart for Pittsburgh doesn't say so I'm guessing their numbers are monthly, feel free to correct. Pretty clear I'll do better under Obamacare.
Depends.
Women may do better than men, especially old women.
Not as if you have a choice, though, is it?
If your current plan isn't 'creditable' according to Obamacare, you lose it, don't you?
I ran the numbers using every age ending in zero. The higher the age, the higher the premium. The chart didn't ask for gender.
A retarded coward? Unusual but I do understand how intimidating my intellect can be to an ignorant conservatard such as yourself.
If you think what you have is intellect, then you truly are a dullard of epic proportions. Now run along and try to impress some third grader with your schoolyard nonsense.
If you think what you have is intellect, then you truly are a dullard of epic proportions. Now run along and try to impress some third grader with your schoolyard nonsense.