Despicable Trump Pays Workers SLAVE WAGES

Nomad said:
She negotiates the final price she will pay which determines what the workers make.

If she had an ounce of decency, she would make it a condition of the contract that the workers get paid a decent wage.

How hard is that for you to comprehend?
Click to expand...

You have a very limited understanding of economics. You should refrain from posting on the topic. You look really stupid here. Ivanka is not responsible for the actions of another company. Fucking idiot
 
tinfoil said:
You have a very limited understanding of economics. You should refrain from posting on the topic. You look really stupid here. Ivanka is not responsible for the actions of another company. Fucking idiot
Click to expand...

She could refuse to do business with them unless they stipulate in the contract that the workers will be paid a certain amount.

It's done all the time.

And given who she is and who she's the daughter of, they'd likely jump through any hoops to get that business.

You have a very limited understanding of economics. You should refrain from posting on the topic. You look really stupid here.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Trump pays workers SO LITTLE...


Indonesian workers who make Ivanka Trump’s fashion line are too poor to live with their own children




Workers who make Ivanka Trump’s clothing line at a factory in Indonesia endure degrading conditions for “poverty wages” — or, in other words, typical circumstances in their part of the world.

More than a dozen workers at the fashion label’s factory in Subang complained about one of the lowest minimum wages in Asia, along with impossible production targets, intimidation and verbal abuse, reported The Guardian.

The workers are actually paid less there than at a factory in China where labor activists were arrested last week while investigating possible abuses.

PT Buma Apparel Industry, a Korean-owned company, operates the factory in Subang, West Java, that supplies G-III Apparel Group, the wholesale manufacturer for Trump’s clothing and other fashion brands.

“Sure I’m proud to make clothes for a well-known brand,” said one worker, identified as Fadli. “But because I see the price tags, I have to wonder, can’t they pay us a bit more?”

The mostly Muslim workers there are aware of who Trump is, and they aren’t fans of her father’s presidency.

“We don’t like Donald Trump’s policies,” said one worker, identified as Ahmad. “But we’re not in a position to make employment decisions based on our principles.”

Ahmad and his wife, Alia, live in two rooms at a boarding house they rent for $30 a month, hours away from their children, who live with their grandmother and visit their parents about one weekend a month.

Alia makes about $173 a month, the legal minimum wage in her province — which is the lowest rate in all of Indonesia and about 40 percent less than her Chinese counterparts.

Workers are expected to make between 58 and 92 garments every half hour, between 7 a.m. and 4 p.m. — although the company frequently underreports actual production by nearly half — and managers verbally abuse them as “animals, moron and monkey.”

About 200 of the more than 2,700 workers at the Buma factory are unionized, and non-union workers are often forced to work overtime to make up production shortfalls their managers say they missed during regular hours.

The company also has a pattern of firing employees ahead of Ramadan and rehiring them later to avoid paying a religious holiday bonus under Indonesian law, the newspaper reported.

Women who are permanent employees get three months of paid maternity leave, as well as mandatory federal health insurance and a $10.50 monthly bonus if they don’t take a day off for menstruation.

About three-quarters of Buma’s workers are women, and they devote almost all their income to children they can’t afford to live with.

Those conditions are fairly typical for Indonesia and Malaysia, according to labor experts.

Alia, who hopes to one day get out from under crushing debt and rejoin her children, burst out laughing when a reporter explained the basic premise of Ivanka Trump’s new book on working women.

Her idea of work-life balance, according to The Guardian, would be seeing her children more than once a month, assuming they can afford gasoline.

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/ind...are-too-poor-to-live-with-their-own-children/
Click to expand...

Slaves don't get paid, BOY.
 
TTQ64 said:
I'm arguing no such thing. That is what you spun out of my comment to get the focus off of racist white men.
Click to expand...

Lol, No. you are saying there have been no racist white liberal men in the past. That is what you are saying here.
 
TTQ64 said:
Again, what does this have to do with my post and him paying a decent wage?
Click to expand...

When someone offers $5/hour skills, $5/hour is a decent wage.

Why do you believe someone doing a job requiring skills that an 8 year old can do get paid more than a few bucks an hour?
 
Covfefe said:
It couldn't be written in the contract that the workers should receive a living wage?
Click to expand...

How about those demanding a living wage try EARNING it instead of expecting it be given to them? Are you opposed to people earning what they get?
 
Nomad said:
Minimum wage doesn't mean shit.

She could make a higher wage a condition of the contract.

Of course, she wouldn't.

Why worry about the starving people in third world countries who produce her crap when there is are big profits​ to be made?

Same attitude you'd have if you were ever actually in the position to make such a decision.
Click to expand...

When you have less than minimum wage skills, minimum wage should be looked at as a gift not a burden. After all these years, why haven't you learned that, BOY?
 
CFM said:
When someone offers $5/hour skills, $5/hour is a decent wage.

Why do you believe someone doing a job requiring skills that an 8 year old can do get paid more than a few bucks an hour?
Click to expand...

Assuming arguendo your sincerity, eyeroll, I must infer that you wish death upon every human lacking the skills exceeding an 8 year old. That would result in death to everyone ages 1-7 in the world, and everyone over that age who lack them.

Sorry to hear you support mass death for all children and the disabled or guileless or those lacking median intelligence. Can you also solve the ugly problem? What should be done with the aesthetically displeasing? Can we kill them too?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top