Describe Hillary ???

anatta said:
sociopath isn't social skills -it's almost the complete absence of remorse. In Freudian psych it would be an absence of the Superego.
One does what one wants to advance oneself regardless of the consequences to others.
Click to expand...

This does describe the cunt.
 
NOVA said:
A sociopath is typically defined as someone who lies incessantly to get their way and does so with little concern for

others.

A sociopath is often goal-oriented (i.e., lying is focused—it is done to get one’s way). Sociopaths have little regard or respect for the rights and feelings of others.

Sociopaths are often charming and charismatic, but they use their talented social skills in manipulative and self-centered ways



THERE YOU GO......PERFECT !
Click to expand...
I was going to call you on this because of the "Sociopaths are often charming and charismatic, but they use their talented social skills in manipulative and self-centered ways", but then I read it again and caught the "often". Hillary is anything but "charming and charismatic"...so, you nailed it!
 
Not an agent of Moscow? Not a fascist? No hatred of America? No despising of their own kind? A true patriot? Not an enemy of the republic? Not an enemy of liberty and freedom?
 


620x434.jpg
 
Racists Aren't Human said:
Not an agent of Moscow? Not a fascist? No hatred of America? No despising of their own kind? A true patriot? Not an enemy of the republic? Not an enemy of liberty and freedom?
Click to expand...

No a racist anti Semitic Nazi whore who needs to be in prison, the Clinton campaign is run by Nazi pigs and anyone who supports them is a Nazi pig.
 
Thing1 said:
Man, your posts are really boring, CFM.

Predictable.
Click to expand...

I predicted the likes of you would continue to claim you're not partisan while doing that very thing in support of Hillary. The sad part is while doing it, you claim others do the same thing and are wrong for it.

I predicted you'd say all those speeches last night were good. You threw the so so remarks about Fauxkahontas Warren to try and appear you weren't following the Democrat line. I saw right through it.

What's boring is watching all you Hillary supports line up for a piece of the "V" while claiming her being female has nothing to do with it and rallying behind Bolshevik Bernie lying about how someone he said wasn't qualified for the job suddenly being the best one for the job.
 
CFM said:
I predicted the likes of you would continue to claim you're not partisan while doing that very thing in support of Hillary. The sad part is while doing it, you claim others do the same thing and are wrong for it.

I predicted you'd say all those speeches last night were good. You threw the so so remarks about Fauxkahontas Warren to try and appear you weren't following the Democrat line. I saw right through it.

What's boring is watching all you Hillary supports line up for a piece of the "V" while claiming her being female has nothing to do with it and rallying behind Bolshevik Bernie lying about how someone he said wasn't qualified for the job suddenly being the best one for the job.
Click to expand...

For starters, approximately zero people who are not right-wing hacks thought Michelle Obama gave a speech for the ages last night. And I've even heard praise from some right-wing hacks.

Same with Booker and Sanders, though to a somewhat lesser extent. But all 3 of those were excellent speeches, by any standard.

The "likes of you" just can't acknowledge anything good when it's not a right-wing thing. So, there's that.
 
Thing1 said:
For starters, approximately zero people who are not right-wing hacks thought Michelle Obama gave a speech for the ages last night. And I've even heard praise from some right-wing hacks.

Same with Booker and Sanders, though to a somewhat lesser extent. But all 3 of those were excellent speeches, by any standard.

The "likes of you" just can't acknowledge anything good when it's not a right-wing thing. So, there's that.
Click to expand...

The likes of you automatically say it's good simply because of who gave it.

I'll acknowledge good when I hear it. You believe what they said was good, therefore, you believe everyone should and when they don't, you throw the partisan nonsense excuse.

Pucker up to the "V". Bernie did despite saying Hillary wasn't qualified. There's no other viable reason based on what HE said recently about how she couldn't do the job.
 
CFM said:
The likes of you automatically say it's good simply because of who gave it.

I'll acknowledge good when I hear it. You believe what they said was good, therefore, you believe everyone should and when they don't, you throw the partisan nonsense excuse.

Pucker up to the "V". Bernie did despite saying Hillary wasn't qualified. There's no other viable reason based on what HE said recently about how she couldn't do the job.
Click to expand...

Did you think Michelle Obama's speech was good?
 
Thing1 said:
Did you think Michelle Obama's speech was good?
Click to expand...

The entire speech was of the whiny attitude. The first 3 minutes was patting herself and Barry on the back. The next few minutes was lying about how she thought Hillary was the best one for the job. I quit watching after getting tired of hearing her lie like a cheap rug.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top