Dershowitz: Targeting Trump's lawyer should worry us all

Nordberg said:
never unchecked. He has to get permission from Rosenstein. Rosenstein signed on to the raid because he saw it as legal and necessary/ The worst part was Trump saiyg a raid of this suckup lawyers offices was an attack on America.
Click to expand...
Trump should have fired Rosenstein months ago.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
noise said:
The OP is by Dershowitz
Click to expand...


Alan Dershowitz ? Geez- he's an agent for ' Israel '.
Whatever Dershowitz is up to- it ain't for the well-being of the United States of America.

You'd better have his motives examined. I smell AIPAC looking for more political leverage.


elephant.jpg
 
Last edited:
moon2012 said:
Alan Dershowitz ? Geez- he's an agent for ' Israel '.
Whatever Dershowitz is up to- it ain't for the well-being of the United States of America.

You'd better have his motives examined.
Click to expand...
oh jeeze.. it's not ALL about Israel all the time!

He's a Constitutional law professor.
he brought up the point a sitting POTUS isn't indicted -Mueller would refer to Impeach..he knows US law.
 
noise said:
why was Mueller there to begin with? Aside from the fact he just goes where he wants to unchecked.

the only reason for him to be there was exigent circumstances..he couldn't have gotten that
without fishing.
Probable cause isn't enough by itself to violate atty/client relationship. then he farms it out to manhattan south?
Click to expand...

Dershowitz is right about a couple of things.

The first one is obvious: liberals would be screaming bloody murder if a prosecutor raided Clinton’s lawyer’s office [omg, imagine the stuff they would find though. Must be someway to cheat the law and do it] And they can save their breath denying it.

The second thing is related to the first and I brought it up in my OP yesterday: where are the libertarians amongst the liberals? It used to be that for all of progressive’s many warts, they did at least have a strong libertarian bent.

But Mueller does an end-around the 4th amendment to get to Trump’s lawyer’s papers—-and not a peep out of them. What prosecutor wouldn’t want to raid a subject’s lawyer’s office? Mueller didn’t let a little thing like constitution get in the way, so he has another prosecutor do it for him.

That’s called skirting the law; the Swamp is famous for it [see: changing words to keep from indicting Hillary] and it’s a big reason us Normals and Deplorable’s loathe the DC establishment.

Thanks to Mueller’s witch hunt, from now on people will have less confidence in attorney/client privilege because the 6th amendment is just words on a piece of paper to a determined prosecutor.
 
Darth Omar said:
Dershowitz is right about a couple of things.

The first one is obvious: liberals would be screaming bloody murder if a prosecutor raided Clinton’s office. And they can save their breath denying it.

The second thing is related to the first and I brought it up in my OP yesterday: where are the libertarians amongst the liberals? It used to be that for all of progressive’s many warts, they did at least have a strong libertarian bent.

But Mueller does an end-around the 4th amendment to get to Trump’s lawyer’s papers—-and not a peep out of them. What prosecutor wouldn’t want to raid a subject’s lawyer’s office? Mueller didn’t let a little thing like constitution get in the way, so he has another prosecutor do it for him.

That’s called skirting the law; the Swamp is famous for it [see: changing words to keep from indicting Hillary] and it’s a big reason us Normals and Deplorable’s loathe the DC establishment.

Thanks to Mueller’s witch hunt, from now on people will have less confidence in attorney/client privilege because the 6th amendment are just words on a piece of paper to a determined prosecutor.
Click to expand...
libertarian Dems? Dems are a bunch of statists. anyways...

Something is rotten in Denmark. It looks like Mueller was looking at payments to Stormy...
why is Mueller looking at Stormy? It ain't because she has big boobs

Mueller is going to drag out anything that's a questionable Trump move one way or the other and pass a referral to Congress.
The Dem's will froth about it if they take the House.
Make a bunch of impeachment noise, we'll waste another year with this bullshit.
I can't see a soft landing to this witch hunt
 
noise said:
libertarian Dems? Dems are a bunch of statists. anyways...

Something is rotten in Denmark. It looks like Mueller was looking at payments to Stormy...
why is Mueller looking at Stormy? It ain't because she has big boobs

Mueller is going to drag out anything that's a questionable Trump move one way or the other and pass a referral to Congress.
The Dem's will froth about it if they take the House.
Make a bunch of impeachment noise, we'll waste another year with this bullshit.
I can't see a soft landing to this witch hunt
Click to expand...

I can see political blowback from it and there’s clear historical precedent in republicans going after Bill Clinton.

At some point, Mueller needs to come up with something on Trump, that’s actually related to the election, or Trump won’t be the only one calling it a witch hunt.
 
noise said:
oh jeeze.. it's not ALL about Israel all the time!
Click to expand...

No, it's not. It's about ' Israel ' when it's about ' Israel '
If that seems too frequent then that's because it's frequently about ' Israel '
I see the motive. It's about AIPAC political leverage because it's Dershowitz . The man is tainted.
 
noise said:
oh jeeze.. it's not ALL about Israel all the time!

He's a Constitutional law professor.
he brought up the point a sitting POTUS isn't indicted -Mueller would refer to Impeach..he knows US law.
Click to expand...
It is for Moontwat, the Joos are everywhere!

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
moon2012 said:
No, it's not. It's about ' Israel ' when it's about ' Israel '
If that seems too frequent then that's because it's frequently about ' Israel '
I see the motive. It's about AIPAC political leverage because it's Dershowitz . The man is tainted.
Click to expand...
Of course you do, wouldn't expect anything else from a conspiracy theorist like you.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
Darth Omar said:
I can see political blowback from it and there’s clear historical precedent in republicans going after Bill Clinton.

At some point, Mueller needs to come up with something on Trump, that’s actually related to the election, or Trump won’t be the only one calling it a witch hunt.
Click to expand...
remeber the game here is to kill the Trump presidency.
That's been the goal from the start by Brennan and the FBI's 7th floor.
Rosenweasel's motives might be more plebeian - protect his butt from FISA examination...don't know
Or he could just be a dweeb pawn in this game..

Did you see any coverage on Xi's blinking on tariffs last night> I saw a blurb on Fox -doubtful if Fake News carried it. This after days of frenetic coverage of "trade war"

Keep making noise. distract. salacious coverage..degrade the message..the modus operandi
 
noise said:
remeber the game here is to kill the Trump presidency.
That's been the goal from the start by Brennan and the FBI's 7th floor.
Rosenweasel's motives might be more plebeian - protect his butt from FISA examination...don't know
Or he could just be a dweeb pawn in this game..

Did you see any coverage on Xi's blinking on tariffs last night> I saw a blurb on Fox -doubtful if Fake News carried it. This after days of frenetic coverage of "trade war"

Keep making noise. distract. salacious coverage..degrade the message..the modus operandi
Click to expand...

This is also a conspiracy theory.
 
noise said:
remeber the game here is to kill the Trump presidency.
That's been the goal from the start by Brennan and the FBI's 7th floor.
Rosenweasel's motives might be more plebeian - protect his butt from FISA examination...don't know
Or he could just be a dweeb pawn in this game..

Did you see any coverage on Xi's blinking on tariffs last night> I saw a blurb on Fox -doubtful if Fake News carried it. This after days of frenetic coverage of "trade war"

Keep making noise. distract. salacious coverage..degrade the message..the modus operandi
Click to expand...

Xi blinked because Trump holds all the cards—and they both know it. Trump is doing something any president could have done in the past 15-20 years but they feared taking a hit in the polls.

We finally have an effective president that ‘gets it’ and these idiots want to get rid of him at any cost.
 
noise said:
why was Mueller there to begin with? Aside from the fact he just goes where he wants to unchecked.

the only reason for him to be there was exigent circumstances..he couldn't have gotten that
without fishing.
Probable cause isn't enough by itself to violate atty/client relationship. then he farms it out to manhattan south?
Click to expand...

1506325735448.jpg


This is the face of the tough guys who walked into office talking tough guy shit and attacking the FBI, CIA, the Media and everybody else who didn't kiss Trump's ass.

Now they whine like babies as all the people and institutions they attacked rejoice at your downfall and celebrate your tears.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top