derp derp 'terror' derp derp

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think we should all start a movement to have as many people google these two things and see what they do when huge numbers of people all do it at once.


That would show them who they work for
 
I think we should all start a movement to have as many people google these two things and see what they do when huge numbers of people all do it at once.


That would show them who they work for

We already have that movement. Its called PRISM.
 
Michele Catalano was looking for information online about pressure cookers. Her husband, in the same time frame, was Googling backpacks. Wednesday morning, six men from a joint terrorism task force showed up at their house to see if they were terrorists. Which prompts the question: How'd the government know what they were Googling?

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/nati...knocking-doors-because-google-searches/67864/

This smells like total BS:


One hundred times a week, groups of six armed men drive to houses in three black SUVs, conducting consented-if-casual searches of the property perhaps in part because of things people looked up online.


If a hundred people a week (for how many weeks now?) have been harassed for looking up things online we'd sure as hell have heard more than one blogger talking about it.

And then there's this:


But after reading the questions Catalano says investigators asked her husband, it’s clear that they could come from information that is not Catalano’s search history — say, an anonymous tip from a jumpy neighbor. (Maybe someone who noted this Facebook picture.) And there’s little to suggest Catalano is on a watch-list or that any terrorism investigators were involved, at all. A spokeswoman for the FBI’s New York field office, out of which the New York and Long Island JTTTs are based, said the investigation was led by the Nassau County Police Department with assistance from the Suffolk County Police Department, and the FBI was not involved.


1044489_10153008673760061_866061683_n.jpg



Google ‘pressure cooker,’ get a police visit? Maybe not.
 
Usually when a blogger who freelances for The Blaze comes up with a story like this one would want to think about it for a second...

Especially when she writes an article like this:

http://trueslant.com/michelecatalan...l-how-one-tweet-turned-a-man-into-a-criminal/

Twitter jokes on trial: how one tweet turned a man into a criminal
By MICHELE CATALANO
“Crap! Robin Hood Airport is closed. You’ve got a week and a bit to get your shit together otherwise I’m blowing the airport sky high!“

And with that tweet, the life of Paul Chambers took a very wrong turn.

Chambers was referring to the fact that the airport was closed due to a snowstorm. He was flying out the next week from Doncaster, England to visit his girlfriend in Ireland and was anxious his flight would be canceled. He did what is a very common thing in the age of social media – he put his thoughts out there for people to read. He assumed what he said would be seen only by his followers, sort of like talking in a room full of friends. But days later, the tweet was found by airport manager Shaun Duffield who told the court yesterday that the threat was not considered to be credible and no effect on airport operations.

Even though higher authorities were taking charge on the perceived threat, one would think the saga would end there, where it was deemed non credible. They’d realize it was a joke, slap Chambers on the wrist while telling him not to do anything like that again, and move on. But that’s not what happened at all. Instead, the case was handed over to the Crown Prosecution Service.

Chambers was arrested, questioned for seven hours (where he had to explain Twitter to the people doing the questioning), suspended from his job and banned for life from Robin Hood airport. Yesterday, almost five months after what he thought was an innocuous – albeit hyperbolic - joke tweet, Paul Chambers was found guilty of sending a menacing message over a public telecommunications network. He was fined £385 plus £600 costs (which British actor/writer Stephen Fry has offered to pay) and now has a criminal record that will keep him from becoming an accountant.


Seeing as how even her contemporaries have accused her of faking this story I'd say she's full of shit.
 
a legitimate media source of 'theatlanticwire', denials by the feds and no comments from the locals, and an apparent attack piece from a admin mouthpiece news source means I'm the one that got owned? you liberals are a real piece of work, defending and supporting this war on terror crap that you gave Bush/Cheney all kinds of crap for. you idiots are the real hypocrites
 
What are you talking about, howey? I googled Paul Chambers and found numerous articles including one from BBC. Do tell us your source. You never seem to cite anything useful. You claim she made up the story and even say her peers doubt her credibilty. You need to cite your sources or it is you who appears to be full of shit
 
a legitimate media source of 'theatlanticwire', denials by the feds and no comments from the locals, and an apparent attack piece from a admin mouthpiece news source means I'm the one that got owned? you liberals are a real piece of work, defending and supporting this war on terror crap that you gave Bush/Cheney all kinds of crap for. you idiots are the real hypocrites

She's supposed to be a "journalist". A "journalist" documents everything. She has nothing...no proof, no nothing. Couldn't take a pic of them driving up on her cell phone? Nah...

She's a attention whore seeking publicity.

What are you talking about, howey? I googled Paul Chambers and found numerous articles including one from BBC. Do tell us your source. You never seem to cite anything useful. You claim she made up the story and even say her peers doubt her credibilty. You need to cite your sources or it is you who appears to be full of shit

Who the fuck is Paul Chambers?
 
I think we should all start a movement to have as many people google these two things and see what they do when huge numbers of people all do it at once.


That would show them who they work for
They work for your favorite president. This is the intelligence and counter terror unit of Barrack Obama. How do you like him now?
 
What are you talking about, howey? I googled Paul Chambers and found numerous articles including one from BBC. Do tell us your source. You never seem to cite anything useful. You claim she made up the story and even say her peers doubt her credibilty. You need to cite your sources or it is you who appears to be full of shit

Oh. I get it now. I'm not saying she fabricated the Chambers story, dumbfuck. I'm saying she fabricated her story about the google search.

Gawd, you're dense.
 
Yup, the story is total BS:


But the Suffolk County Police Department, which visited Catalano, now says in a statement that they visited Catalano's home yesterday because of an old-fashioned tip. A computer company discovered that one of their employees—presumably either Catalano's husband or son—had been conducting suspicious searches on their work computer, and contacted the police.

The statement reads:


Suffolk County Criminal Intelligence Detectives received a tip from a Bay Shore based computer company regarding suspicious computer searches conducted by a recently released employee. The former employee’s computer searches took place on this employee’s workplace computer. On that computer, the employee searched the terms “pressure cooker bombs” and “backpacks.”​


Police interviewed the man and investigated the incident and found nothing. Thus, our dystopian privacy nightmare hellscape is slightly less nightmarish.


How A Paranoid Blogger Made Everyone Scared to Google Pressure Cookers


I wish people would use a little bit of common sense before spreading ridiculous stories like this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top