"Deplorables" Harvest 1,000 Acres of Neighbor's Crop After He Has Heart Attack

Cypress said:
Farmers are the biggest socialists in USA. Their business model depends on federal price support, government subsidized water, federal technical and research support, federal weather and climate forecasting, and federal soil conservation programs
Click to expand...

SLATE-1.jpg
 
PostmodernProphet said:
you can find stories like this every year.......got to participate once when I was in high school......it was awesome.......farmers brought in combines from all over, they did his entire farm in one afternoon......I think each farmer only got to do one round through the field there were so many.....
\
here's a picture of the one from North Dakota....
ecc104507dcc0635205c6f14293718e8.jpg
Click to expand...

YEP.....THAT'S "DEPLORABLES" FOR YOU.....
 
Cypress said:
Agricultural price supports have been around since the 1930s.

Government funded water supply dams and irrigation distribution systems have existed since at least the 1920s and 30s.

Government funded soil conservation programs have existed since the dust bowl of the 1930s.

Reasonably sure there were government funded weather and climate forecasting services in the 1950s.
Click to expand...

WE CAN SURVIVE WITHOUT YOU; WE CANNOT SURVIVE W/O FARMERS....
 
christiefan915 said:
Are you truly dumb enough to think only people in the midwest make good neighbors? The Amish do things like this all the time and they don't always vote.
Click to expand...

A LOT MORE COMMON IN THE HEARTLAND AND THE SOUTH...= WHY IT's CALLED "THE HEARTLAND".

DEMOCRATS LIVE OVERWHLMINGLY IN CITIES AND SUBURBS...CLUSTERED UP LIKE RATS.

LOOK AT THE COUNTY BY COUNTY ELECTORAL MAP FROM 2016.

THERE's A REASON WHY NO ONE HAS EVER HEARD OF "NORTHEASTERN HOSPITALITY"......

THE AMISH ARE SURE AS FUCK NOT TREASON-O-CRATS....GO TELL A NICE BURLY ONE THAT YOU WISH HE'D ABORT HIS CHILD....
 
Cypress said:
Agricultural price supports have been around since the 1930s.

Government funded water supply dams and irrigation distribution systems have existed since at least the 1920s and 30s.

Government funded soil conservation programs have existed since the dust bowl of the 1930s.

Reasonably sure there were government funded weather and climate forecasting services in the 1950s.
Click to expand...

Government wouldn't have harvested this man's crops.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
While the Democrats would give them shitty government run health care and double their taxes to pay for it.
Click to expand...

I know how the right wing loves to lie especially when it comes to Democrats, however, in light of the reality that your gawds, and masters, have no alternative (they have been lying about having a plan since 1994) would you mind explaining just how the Democrat plan is soooooo bad? And please try to use actual details not just your "opinion".
 
Another beyond childish Grokey fallacy. Grow up man, you're actually trying to politicize being human and part of a community, something that goes beyond your pissy man-child grievances. You're embarrassing yourself and others.
 
Old Trapper said:
I know how the right wing loves to lie especially when it comes to Democrats, however, in light of the reality that your gawds, and masters, have no alternative (they have been lying about having a plan since 1994) would you mind explaining just how the Democrat plan is soooooo bad? And please try to use actual details not just your "opinion".
Click to expand...

Strawman argument.

The Democrat plan(s) are same shit, different day. They all rely on increasing government in health insurance and government subsidizing that or even taking it over entirely. There's plenty of Democrats and their supporters who point to Europe and elsewhere as the model to do this. Such plans are ghastly expensive and usually don't deliver a high quality of service.

Right now it's "build on Obamacare" or "Medicaid for all." Those are just socialized medicine. Nothing new, nothing innovative, and very costly for poor ROI.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Strawman argument.

The Democrat plan(s) are same shit, different day. They all rely on increasing government in health insurance and government subsidizing that or even taking it over entirely. There's plenty of Democrats and their supporters who point to Europe and elsewhere as the model to do this. Such plans are ghastly expensive and usually don't deliver a high quality of service.
Click to expand...

I ask for facts, and get the usual right wing line of crap.

Democratic Socialism has been around since the Founding of the country even though the Founders called it "good government". Free health care for the poor (Ben Franklin), poor houses, and food banks (US Congress), preventing wealth inequality (Jefferson, Madison, etc.), limiting the influence of corporations, etc., are part of what made this country what it is. As de Togueville said (paraphrasing now) "As long as America remains good it will remain great", and America has lost its way. The Danish countries have adopted Democratic Socialism, and it is cheaper, and in many ways better then our system.

https://www.aetnainternational.com/...h-care-quality-in-europe-and-scandinavia.html

But you know that. You just can't accept it.

Right now it's "build on Obamacare" or "Medicaid for all." Those are just socialized medicine. Nothing new, nothing innovative, and very costly for poor ROI.
Click to expand...

It is funny that the Republican governors that refused to enlarge medicaid when Obama was in office are now being forced to do so by the people. But you know, if we went to a flat tax, and quit giving the countries wealth to the 1%, we could quite easily afford ACA, and much more.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrew...te-voters-are-passing-it-anyway/#3a607f474a17

"Instead of pursuing expansion through a legislative route, advocates for the program have in recent years sponsored ballot initiatives to take the issue straight to voters – all of which have been successful thus far despite difficult partisan terrain.

The Fairness Project, a non-profit that promotes economic and social justice, has successfully led referendums to expand Medicaid in four deep red states – Idaho, Utah, Nebraska and Oklahoma – and Maine, a purple state whose Republican former governor rejected expansion three times.

On Tuesday, the Fairness Project notched another win with the passage of Medicaid in Missouri, a state that voted for Trump by nearly 20 points in 2016 but which backed expansion by a margin of 6 points, according to the New York Times."
 
Last edited:
Old Trapper said:
I ask for facts, and get the usual right wing line of crap.

Democratic Socialism has been around since the Founding of the country even though the Founders called it "good government". Free health care for the poor (Ben Franklin), poor houses, and food banks (US Congress), preventing wealth inequality (Jefferson, Madison, etc.), limiting the influence of corporations, etc., are part of what made this country what it is. As de Togueville said (paraphrasing now) "As long as America remains good it will remain great", and America has lost its way. The Danish countries have adopted Democratic Socialism, and it is cheaper, and in many ways better then our system.

But you know that. You just can't accept it.



It is funny that the Republican governors that refused to enlarge medicaid when Obama was in office are now doing so. But you know, if we went to a flat tax, and quit giving the countries wealth to the 1%, we could quite easily afford ACA, and much more.
Click to expand...

Programs for the poor and regulations on commerce are not Democratic Socialism. Also, just wondering, how many "Danish" countries are there? I'm only aware of one.
 
Did they relieve his mortal coil of watches, spare cash and token family heirlooms from his body like an old western movie?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top