When did I tell the grifter grandma to quit? Your beef is with the OP.
When did I say you said that? I'm speaking about the OP where she is told to "give up".
Obi Wan Says: "The Defensive is strong in this one."
When did I tell the grifter grandma to quit? Your beef is with the OP.
When did I say you said that? I'm speaking about the OP where she is told to "give up". Obi Wan Says: "The Defensive is strong in this one."
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/us...alins_historical_account/srvc=home&position=0
Yeah... I guess we should call her stupid real quickly because, although she was right about what she said, she only got the information from local historians while learning about the history of the revolution with her family... So, it can't be that she actually can absorb information, it must just be "luck".
Have you forgotten this thread already?
You'd lose. Get an adult to explain the big words in the linked article to you, Liability.
Your money - such as it is, is safe. I don't take money from mental defectives like you.
We've found a lot of brutal poll numbers for Sarah Palin so far in 2011: down in South Dakota, down in South Carolina, down in Arizona, only up by 1 point in Texas, only up by 1 point in Nebraska to name a few. But this has to be the worst- independent voters say they would support Charlie Sheen over Palin for President by a 41/36 margin. Seriously.
Despite her deficit with independents Palin does lead Sheen 49-29 overall. We also tested Barack Obama against Sheen and the President leads 57-24.
Sheen is one of the most unpopular figures we've ever polled on. 10% of Americans rate him favorably to 67% with a negative opinion of him. The only people we've ever found worse numbers for are Rod Blagojevich in Illinois (an 8/83 favorability spread), Jesse Jackson Jr. in Illinois (a 10/73 favorability), and Levi Johnston in Alaska (a 6/72 favorability). Sheen's -57 spread ties what we found for John Edwards in North Carolina the last time we polled him (15/72).
Sheen's unpopularity is pretty universal across party lines so it says something about the level of polarization in the country right now that Democrats would support him by a 44-24 margin for President over Palin and that Republicans would support him 37-28 over Obama. People may not have any respect for Sheen but they still think he'd be a better alternative than their opposing party's leading figure.
Obviously Charlie Sheen's not going to run for the White House but the Palin numbers are one of the more interesting benchmarks yet pointing to just how minuscule her chance at the Presidency would be even if she did decide to get into the race.
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2011/03/palin-trails-sheen-with-independents.html?loc=interstitialskip[/FONT]
And yet, here you are at the same hour.
Are you right, Liability?
I don't need to chase girls, Liability, but thanks for caring.
BTW, what's my age?
It's hard to "give up" when you haven't started. People are seriously insane when it comes to Sarah Palin, especially the left.
You'd lose. Get an adult to explain the big words in the linked article to you, Liability.
Your money - such as it is, is safe. I don't take money from mental defectives like you.
We've found a lot of brutal poll numbers for Sarah Palin so far in 2011: down in South Dakota, down in South Carolina, down in Arizona, only up by 1 point in Texas, only up by 1 point in Nebraska to name a few. But this has to be the worst- independent voters say they would support Charlie Sheen over Palin for President by a 41/36 margin. Seriously.
Despite her deficit with independents Palin does lead Sheen 49-29 overall. We also tested Barack Obama against Sheen and the President leads 57-24.
Sheen is one of the most unpopular figures we've ever polled on. 10% of Americans rate him favorably to 67% with a negative opinion of him. The only people we've ever found worse numbers for are Rod Blagojevich in Illinois (an 8/83 favorability spread), Jesse Jackson Jr. in Illinois (a 10/73 favorability), and Levi Johnston in Alaska (a 6/72 favorability). Sheen's -57 spread ties what we found for John Edwards in North Carolina the last time we polled him (15/72).
Sheen's unpopularity is pretty universal across party lines so it says something about the level of polarization in the country right now that Democrats would support him by a 44-24 margin for President over Palin and that Republicans would support him 37-28 over Obama. People may not have any respect for Sheen but they still think he'd be a better alternative than their opposing party's leading figure.
Obviously Charlie Sheen's not going to run for the White House but the Palin numbers are one of the more interesting benchmarks yet pointing to just how minuscule her chance at the Presidency would be even if she did decide to get into the race.
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2011/03/palin-trails-sheen-with-independents.html?loc=interstitialskip[/FONT]
And yet, here you are at the same hour.
Are you right, Liability?
I don't need to chase girls, Liability, but thanks for caring.
BTW, what's my age?
When did I say you said that? I'm speaking about the OP where she is told to "give up".
Obi Wan Says: "The Defensive is strong in this one."
You'd lose. Get an adult to explain the big words in the linked article to you, Liability.
Your money - such as it is, is safe. I don't take money from mental defectives like you.
We've found a lot of brutal poll numbers for Sarah Palin so far in 2011: down in South Dakota, down in South Carolina, down in Arizona, only up by 1 point in Texas, only up by 1 point in Nebraska to name a few. But this has to be the worst- independent voters say they would support Charlie Sheen over Palin for President by a 41/36 margin. Seriously.
Despite her deficit with independents Palin does lead Sheen 49-29 overall. We also tested Barack Obama against Sheen and the President leads 57-24.
Sheen is one of the most unpopular figures we've ever polled on. 10% of Americans rate him favorably to 67% with a negative opinion of him. The only people we've ever found worse numbers for are Rod Blagojevich in Illinois (an 8/83 favorability spread), Jesse Jackson Jr. in Illinois (a 10/73 favorability), and Levi Johnston in Alaska (a 6/72 favorability). Sheen's -57 spread ties what we found for John Edwards in North Carolina the last time we polled him (15/72).
Sheen's unpopularity is pretty universal across party lines so it says something about the level of polarization in the country right now that Democrats would support him by a 44-24 margin for President over Palin and that Republicans would support him 37-28 over Obama. People may not have any respect for Sheen but they still think he'd be a better alternative than their opposing party's leading figure.
Obviously Charlie Sheen's not going to run for the White House but the Palin numbers are one of the more interesting benchmarks yet pointing to just how minuscule her chance at the Presidency would be even if she did decide to get into the race.
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2011/03/palin-trails-sheen-with-independents.html?loc=interstitialskip[/FONT]
Why....because they think she's a joke.....which she is.
Well, I'm actually kind of surprised she hasn't officially entered the race yet. I think most consider it a given that she will eventually step into the ring. She is capable of winning the Republican primary, but I think polls like this may dissuade her from entering the race.
She isn't even running, yet we have threads upon threads about her and how she should "give up"... That's a bit nuts.
An equal insanity would be people telling John Stewart to drop out of the 2012 Presidential race before it is too late in as many threads as possible.