Dems to lose Senate.

Mott the Hoople said:
How is she not qualified? She has, at this stage of her career, a stronger curriculum vitae than all three of her predecessors in the Presidency. Including her own husband when he ran in 92.
Click to expand...

Where do you come up with this unadulterated crap? More experience than Bill?? When was Hillary a Governor? She has only had limited experience as a Senator and a very short stint as Sec State which was less than successful.

George Bush had less experience? What a stupid claim. But then, making stupid false claims is your forte'.

The only Pearson she exceeds in experience with is Obama; and that is the poet bar ever set by a President thanks to Democrat low information voting fools.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
..nor is she an anti-intellectual reactionary bigot.

The real issue if she is nominated is can the GOP vet a candidate through the primary process in a manner that he/she doesn't go so far to the right that it would alienate the middle as they did in 2008 and 2012.

I haven't seen any strong indicators yet that the GOP has given up it's grasp on the Southern Strategy and any candidate the GOP nominates who runs in the GOP primaries based on the Southern strategy is unelectable at the national level.
Click to expand...

LMAO @ far right. Thats my favorite leftist meme.
 
maineman said:
as much as assholes like Nova and his brethren would love to keep Benghazi in the public eye.... it will be very old news come 2016 campaign season.... it will be seasoned, experienced Hillary against some GOP yahoo who will have had to go hard right and suck a mile of tea party cock to get the nomination and will be unable to shake the etch-a-sketch and hop back towards the middle where all those housewives will be chomping at the bit to vote for a fellow vagina owner for president. It's a done deal as far as I can tell.... as long as she decides to do it.
Click to expand...

LMAO @ seasoned experienced Hillary. Yes, when it comes to the inexperienced dunces the Democratic Party foists on the public, Hillary is seasoned. But her stint as Sec Defense has nothing that can be called an accomplishment except for the Benghazi fiasco she chose not to deal with.

I see your still stuck on that etch-a-sketch meme eh dimwit?

Romney was far right according to leftist dunces because....wait for it....it's coming...he wasn't Liberal!

You people really are too stupid for prime time.
 
given how out of touch some claim the democratic party is these days, it makes you scratch your head when you think about what party won the last two presidential elections, doesn't it?
 
maineman said:
given how out of touch some claim the democratic party is these days, it makes you scratch your head when you think about what party won the last two presidential elections, doesn't it?
Click to expand...

I guess you forgot what party won the two Presidential elections before that.

I'm amused when Liberals point to the Obama Presidency and declare they are winning when shortly thereafter they lost their total control of Congress. Or when Bill won, they lost the Congress to Republicans for the first time in over forty years.

Or the fact that a majority of Governors and State Houses are controlled by Republican majorities. And in those States, the financial conditions of their states are in far better standing than their Democratoc counterparts.

But yes, let's celebrate the fact that low information dunces elected the most inexperienced, inept, economically clueless, arrogant, partisan and divisive man in the history of the office.

You just can't make this crap up people.
 
maineman said:
given how out of touch some claim the democratic party is these days, it makes you scratch your head when you think about what party won the last two presidential elections, doesn't it?
Click to expand...


And how many Senators and Congressmen are Democrats.... Oh, and Governors.
 
maineman said:
I wonder what the JPP right wing "pundits" will be saying after Hillary's inauguration?
Click to expand...

Oh, just about the same shit they have said after both of Bill Clinton's elections and both of President Obama's elections.

They will resort to attacking the intelligence of the American people, call her a liar and basically work to undermine the legitimacy of her presidency.
 
Jarod said:
Oh, just about the same shit they have said after both of Bill Clinton's elections and both of President Obama's elections.

They will resort to attacking the intelligence of the American people, call her a liar and basically work to undermine the legitimacy of her presidency.
Click to expand...

Of course this is nothing like the leftists on JPP still assaulting GWB, Sarah Palin, Republicans and the Tea Party right Counselor?

How about all those baseless attacks on an experienced devout Republican like Romney? How dare he be white and rich....like Clinton or Gore!!

Got hypocrisy Counselor? Or perhaps it's a severe case of selective outrage?
 
Jarod said:
Oh, just about the same shit they have said after both of Bill Clinton's elections and both of President Obama's elections.

They will resort to attacking the intelligence of the American people, call her a liar and basically work to undermine the legitimacy of her presidency.
Click to expand...

Just like the democrats did with George w. Bush blah, blah, blah. Same partisan story. When my side does its ok when the other does its all about undermining the country.
 
cawacko said:
Just like the democrats did with George w. Bush blah, blah, blah. Same partisan story. When my side does its ok when the other does its all about undermining the country.
Click to expand...


The Democrats do the same shit, I agree. I was answering a question about what the Republicans were going to do.

Although I do think the Republicans will be more upset by President H. Clinton's election than they would be about say... Jerry Brown's election... even though Brown is MUCH more liberal. There just seems to be some special hatred for Secretary Clinton.
 
Jarod said:
Although I do think the Republicans will be more upset by President H. Clinton's election than they would be about say... Jerry Brown's election... even though Brown is MUCH more liberal. There just seems to be some special hatred for Secretary Clinton.
Click to expand...

I agree.... when Hillary gets elected, the righties will be so mad, I can envision them stomping themselves into the ground like Rumpelstiltskin. Their hatred for her is obsessive and irrational, imo.
 
Jarod said:
The Democrats do the same shit, I agree. I was answering a question about what the Republicans were going to do.

Although I do think the Republicans will be more upset by President H. Clinton's election than they would be about say... Jerry Brown's election... even though Brown is MUCH more liberal. There just seems to be some special hatred for Secretary Clinton.
Click to expand...

I don't know that Governor Brown is much more liberal. Look at him preventing democrats in congress from spending in California and questioning the legalization of pot and so on. Republicans hated Clinton as First Lady. Then she became a senator and started working well with republican senators and showed she had a hawkish side to her.

This idea that republicans are going to celebrate any democrat becoming President is a fantasy. And you can't tell me democrats would celebrate if a republican wins.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top